Case law

Nurnberg v. Froehlke

355 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 1973

In Crotty v. … Evaluation of the Decision of the Conscientious Objector Review Board In Lovallo v.

Birmingham v. Sogen-Swiss International Corp. Retirement Plan

529 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 21, 1981

Given that the acknowledged purpose of this section is the protection of employees, see McClintock-Trunkey Co. v. C.I.R., 217 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1954); U. S. v. … Central States Southeast v. Hitchings Trucking, 492 F.Supp. 906, 909 (E.D.Mich.1980); cf. Fase v.

Ross v. Allen

515 F. Supp. 972 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 6, 1981

See generally Snepp v. United States, 444 U.S. 507 , 100 S.Ct. 763 , 62 L.Ed.2d 704 (1980); Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Pickering v. … Ross also relies on Caulfield v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 583 F.2d 605 (2d Cir. 1978). Caulfield does not support her.

Paganucci v. City of New York

785 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 1992

Barhold v. Rodriguez, supra, 863 F.2d at 236 (quoting Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, supra, 476 U.S. at 286 , 106 S.Ct. at 1853 ). … Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, supra, 476 U.S. at 292 , 106 S.Ct. at 1856 (O’Con-nor, J., concurring); Johnson v.

Scottish Air International, Inc. v. British Caledonian Group, PLC.

152 F.R.D. 18 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 6, 1993

In 1985, Vidockler was removed from BCG’s board of directors, and advised that no further representatives of SAI would be nominated to sit on the board. … on the BCG board.

Piccolo

District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 3, 2025

wn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order dated October 31, 2025, the Board’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 3, 2025 TAMMI M.

Diakoff v. American Re-Insurance Co.

492 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1980

Purchasing Assoc, v. Weitz, 13 N.Y.2d 267, 272 , 246 N.Y.S.2d 600, 604 , 196 N.E.2d 245 (1963); see Millet v. Slocum, 5 N.Y.2d 734 , 177 N.Y.S.2d 716 , 152 N.E.2d 672 ; Lynch v. … However, the most recent discussion of restrictive covenants, Post v.

Continental Copper & Steel Industries, Inc. v. Johnson

491 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 22, 1980

This case thus differs from Spring v. … Similarly, in National Industries, Inc. v.

United States v. Reyes

934 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 17, 1996

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 487-88 , 83 S.Ct. 407, 417-18 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). In Brown v. … United States v. Webster, 750 F.2d 307, 324 (5th Cir. 1984) (citing Brown, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261-62 ; Dunaway v.

United States ex rel. Cavanaugh v. Howe

235 F. 990 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 9, 1916

Erick v. Lewis, 195 Fed. 696 , 115 C. C. A. 493 . In Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U. S. 9 , 36 Sup. Ct. 3, 60 L. … Chin Tow v. U. S., 208 U. S. 8 [28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369 ], See, further, Zaknaite v. Wolf, 226 U. S. 272 [33 Sup. Ct. 31, 57 L. Ed. 218 ]; Lewis v. Frick, 233 U. S. 291, 297 [34 Sup. Ct. 488, 58 L. Ed. 967 ].”

In Re the Complaint of Delphinus Maritima, S.A.

523 F. Supp. 583 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 1981

on board. … There was no lookout on board the vessel who had no other duties. See Tug Ocean Prince, Inc. v. United States, supra, 584 F.2d at 1155, 1156, 1159 ; Cerro Sales Corp. v.

Bradstreet v. Heran

3 F. Cas. 1180 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 1848

See the case of Goodrich v. … Dealers in cotton are accustomed to call damage received by cotton while it is yet in the country where it is grown, as contradistinguish-ed from such as is received on board ship, country damage. See Davis v.

United States v. Kahan

203 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1962

Beaston by the Railroad Retirement Board and that additional benefits might be paid. “4. After $633.50 in additional benefits had been paid to Edwin Beaston, the case of Edwin Beaston v. … Lewis et al. v. Railroad Retirement Board, 256 Ala. 430 (1951), 54 So.2d 777 , cert. denied, 343 U.S. 919 , 72 S.Ct. 677 , 96 L.Ed. 1333 (1952). .

Skeete v. IVF America, Inc.

972 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 25, 1997

See Holmes, 914 F.Supp. at 1042-43 (collecting cases); Smith, 877 F.Supp. at 172 ; see also Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 1724 n. 1, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … See Sousa v. National Labor Relations Board, 817 F.2d 10, 11 (2d Cir.1987). Skeete states that she only received the Right To Sue Letter on August 24, 1996. (Skeete Aff. at ¶ 3(a)).

Chavin v. McKelvey

25 F. Supp. 2d 231 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 29, 1998

August 31, 1995), aff'd, 101 F.3d 109 (2d Cir.1996)(reliance on oral representations that Board of Directors would definitely approve vesting of employee’s options unreasonable where contract gave Board the discretion to … v.

United States v. Perlmutter

656 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 19, 1987

In United States v. … Present at the closing were Perlmutter, Washington, Jerry Brown, the Title Guarantee Company representative, and a man identified by Jerry Brown as a "relative” of Perlmutter’s. 7 .

Piccolo

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 2025

Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428, 434 (1992) (quoting Anderson v. … Schulz v.

Berkshire Fashions, Inc. v. Sara Lee Corp.

725 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 4, 1989

We are, of course, obligated to give to the findings of the TTAB great weight, in light of the Board’s specialized expertise in resolving trademark disputes. Murphy Door Bed Co. Inc., v. … The Board’s findings of fact are not to be disturbed unless “the contrary is established by testimony which in character and amount carries thorough conviction.” Wilson Jones Co. v. Gilbert & Bennett Mfg.

Duka v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

103 F. Supp. 3d 382 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 2015

See Bond v. … the President of "the ability to oversee the Board.”

Table Talk Pies of Westchester v. Strauss

237 F. Supp. 514 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 1964

NLRB v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601 , 59 S.Ct. 668 , 83 L.Ed. 1014 (1939); NLRB v. … Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 601 (1957); Amalgamated Meat Cutters, etc. v.