Case law

Marco v. Bank of New York

272 F. Supp. 636 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 1967

When Marco v. … Sachs alleged — as an excuse for plaintiff’s failure to make demand on the board of directors of Blue Ridge before commencing Marco v.

United States ex rel. Donham v. Resor

318 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1970

Cf., e.g., United States v. Messinger, 413 F.2d 927, 930, 932 (2d Cir. 1969) , cert. denied, 399 U.S. 927 , 90 S. Ct. 2230 , 26 L.Ed.2d 792 (1970); Paszel v. Laird, 426 F.2d 1169, 1175 (2d Cir. 1970); Salamy v. … United States v. Bornemann, 424 F.2d 1343, 1348-1349 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Messinger, 413 F.2d 927, 930-931 (2d Cir. 1969).

Coastwise S. S. Co. v. Ætna Ins. Co.

161 F. 871 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1908

The cases mentioned under the second point were the Western Transit Co. v. Brown (D. C.) 152 Fed. 476 ; The Niobe, 7 Asp. M. C. N. S. 89. … In Western Transit Co. v. Brown, the libellant, the owner of the steamer Troy, sought to recover the damages paid in consequence of a decision adjudging her partly in fault. Minnesota S. S. Co. v.

Paganucci v. City of New York

785 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 1992

Barhold v. Rodriguez, supra, 863 F.2d at 236 (quoting Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, supra, 476 U.S. at 286 , 106 S.Ct. at 1853 ). … Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, supra, 476 U.S. at 292 , 106 S.Ct. at 1856 (O’Con-nor, J., concurring); Johnson v.

Sipperley v. Federal Security Adm'r

77 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 1948

The findings of the Board as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive, * * The present exercise of the Court’s responsibility is the subject of instruction in the following cases: Walker v. … Altmeyer, 2 Cir., 137 F.2d 531 ; United States v. Lalone, 9 Cir., 152 F.2d 43 .

Voss v. American Federation of Musicians

507 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 17, 1980

See Fogarty v. … Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N.Y.2d 475 , 176 N.Y.S.2d 318 , 151 N.E.2d 874 (1958); Accord, Kopolowitz v. Deepdene Hotel & Tennis Club, 464 F.Supp. 677 (1979).

Hindle v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.

18 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 9, 1955

Defendant says that it is entitled to the waivers and cites orders made by Judge Learned Hand and Judge Edelstein in Jankevics v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., Civ. 50-717, and Continental Grain Co. v. S.S. … It is noteworthy that, in Gimenes v. New York & Porto Rico S.S.

Windsurfing International, Inc. v. Fred Ostermann GmbH

613 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 24, 1985

Bradfield, see Kalman v. … Coca-Cola Co. v.

Manna v. Greenburgh 11 School District

2 F. Supp. 2d 461 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 9, 1998

See Greenburgh No. 11 Federation of Teachers, et al. v. Board of Educ. of Greenburgh No. 11 Sch. Dist., et al., No. 95-2938. … See In re Board of Educ. v. New York State Pub.

Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. Common Council of City of Peekskill

202 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 14, 2002

Peter Pan Games of Bayside, Ltd. v. Board of Estimate of City of New York, 67 A.D.2d 925, 925-26 , 413 N.Y.S.2d 164, 166 (2d Dep’t 1979). … Planning Board of Lloyd, 79 N.Y.2d 373, 383 , 583 N.Y.S.2d 170, 175 , 592 N.E.2d 778 (1992)); see also Townley v.

Nation v. Esperdy

239 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 19, 1965

Holding that such a child is a stepchild, e. g., Larsen v. Harris Structural Steel Co., 230 App.Div. 280 , 243 N.Y.S. pp. 654 (3d Dep’t 1930); Hernandez v. … Union v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co., 312 F.2d 181, 190 (2d Cir. 1962); Local 33, Int’l Hod Carriers v.

Bishop v. Commodity Exchange, Inc.

562 F. Supp. 516 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1983

Prior decisions of this Court relating to these events, Minpeco, S.A. v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 332 , and Gordon v. … (Comex); eight individuals who were serving as board members of the Comex Board of Governors on January 19, 1980 (“the governors”); and the corporations by whom the individual board members were employed (“the corporate defendants

Cummins v. SUNTRUST CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.

649 F. Supp. 2d 224 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 20, 2009

See Brown v. Swett & Crawford of Texas, Inc., 178 S.W.3d 373, 383 (Tex.Ct.App.2005) (“[T]he plaintiff must prove that the statements contained false, defamatory facts rather than opinions or characterizations. … See Ritzmann v.

United States ex rel. Grau v. Uhl

262 F. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 8, 1919

Minnesota v. Brundage, 180 U. S. 499 [21 Sup. Ct. 455, 45 L. Ed. 639 ]; Baker v. Grice, 169 U. S. 284 [18 Sup. Ct. 323, 42 L. … Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U. S. 228, 235 [16 Sup. Ct. 977, 41 L. Ed. 140 ].

Fay v. Douds

79 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1948

Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 1946, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 , 162 A.L.R. 1445 ; Stark v. Wickard, 1944, 321 U.S. 288 , 64 S.Ct. 559 , 88 L.Ed. 733 ; Federal Communications Commission v. … That question does not thrust itself into the Board’s consciousness sua sponte.

United States v. Russian Volunteer Fleet

22 F.2d 187 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 1927

This is not a time charter case, such as Brown v. Turner (1912) App. … In United States v.

News Projection Corp. v. Western Union Tel. Co.

38 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 14, 1941

That court, on May 3, 1939, Dirkes v. … The observation in United States v.

Bruzzone v. Hampton

433 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1977

In Melvin v. … See Van Teslaar v.

T & A'S, INC. v. Town Bd. of Town of Ramapo

109 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 2000

Planning Board Discretion Article XI of the Code sets forth the procedure for obtaining conditional use approval from the Ramapo Planning Board. … Shuttlesworth v.

Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-Maatschappij

15 F.R.D. 32 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1953

Kaufman has held, in Campbell v. General Motors Corp., D.C.S. … Van Der Vorm is chairman of the board of directors or commissaris of Holland-America.