Case law

Milstein v. Werner

57 F.R.D. 515 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 13, 1972

See Air Lines Stewards & Stewardesses Ass’n Local 550 v. American Airlines, 455 F.2d 101 , 108 (6th Cir. 1972); Miller v. Steinbach, 268 F.Supp. 255, 283 (S.D.N.Y.1967); Marcus v. … Zerkle v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, 52 F.R.D. 151, 159 (S.D.N.Y.1971); Glicken v. Bradford, 35 F.R.D. 144, 151 (S.D. N.Y.1964).

Michael v. Slattery

852 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1994

See INS v. Stevie, 467 U.S. 407 , 104 S.Ct. 2489 , 81 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984). … See Board Decision, supra, at 4. The Supreme Court clearly rejected this standard in Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 449-50 , 107 S.Ct. at 1222 . See also Rasool v.

Musselman v. Guttman Institute

674 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1987

See *1039 Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 605 F.2d 35, 38 (2d Cir.1978); see generally Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure: Jurisdiction § 4226 at 341, 343-44 (1978). … See Browning Debenture, 605 F.2d at 39 . Plaintiff could have asserted in this Court the state law claims that it currently pursues in state court because the two cases arise from the same facts.

System Federation No. 152, Railway Employees' Department v. Pennsylvania Railroad

289 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 6, 1968

The plaintiff, an AFL-CIO union, moves for partial summary judgment under Rule 56(a), F.R.Civ.P., On an Award made on June 12, 1961 by the Railroad Adjustment Board, Second Division (“Board” hereafter). … Union v. Union Pacific Railroad, 385 U.S. 157 , 87 S.Ct. 369 , 17 L.Ed.2d 264 (1966).

Aegis Corp. v. Goldman

523 F. Supp. 1273 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 12, 1981

V. … Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426, 431 , 84 S.Ct. 1555, 1559 , 12 L.Ed.2d 423 (1964). Accord, Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375, 381 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 620 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970). S.Rep.

Oblin Homes, Inc. v. Village of Dobbs Ferry

935 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1996

Oblin Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of the Village of Dobbs Ferry, Index No. 7962-94, August 8, 1994. Oblin promptly appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department. … Oblin Homes, Inc., v. Planning Board of the Village of Dobbs Ferry, — A.D.2d —, 635 N.Y.S.2d 279 (2d Dept.1995).

Davis v. Rondina

741 F. Supp. 1115 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1990

V. … See Street v.

Lowey v. Howmet Corp.

424 F. Supp. 461 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1977

Blau v. Lehman, 368 U.S. 408 , 408-10, 82 S.Ct. 461 , 7 L.Ed.2d 403 (1962); accord, Feder v. Martin Marietta Corp., 406 F.2d 260, 263 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1036 , 90 S.Ct. 678 , 24 L.Ed.2d 681 (1970). … In Feder v.

In re Spinnella

3 F.2d 196 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 31, 1924

S. v. Colorado Anthracite Coal, 225 U. S. 219, 223 , 32 S. Ct. 617 , 56 L. Ed. 1063 . … His testimony before the board of special inquiry convinced the board that he was a nonquota immigrant.

Perales v. United States

598 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 14, 1984

Thus, in Hettleman v. … See also Bell v.

General Electric Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.

563 F. Supp. 970 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1983

First, Bucyrus terms inadequate GEC’s “allegations [in the Amended Complaint] relating to the absence of a demand on Ruston’s Board.” … See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. United States; 370 U.S. 294, 328 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1525 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v.

In re Stark

96 F. 88 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 18, 1899

BROWN, District Judge. … It is not necessary to consider here ■whether the words “in contemplation of bankruptcy” in section 14, cl. 2, of the act of 1898, are broader in their signification than under prior acts (Buckingham v.

Pena v. DOVREFJELL

176 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 17, 1959

Porello v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 94 F.Supp. 952 cited with approval, A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Commercial Steve. … Co. v. Nacirema Co., 1958, 355 U.S. 563, 567 , 78 S.Ct. 438 , 2 L.Ed.26 491. 4 . Ignatyuk v. Tramp Chartering Corp., 2 Cir., 1957, 250 E.2d 198, 201.

Caloumeno v. McGowan

668 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 4, 1987

See International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. … Caloumeno was on notice that the Board’s tapes would not be available to him and chose not to make his own tape or transcript. Therefore, his reliance on the Second Circuit’s decisions in Rosario v.

Perth Amboy National Bank v. Brodsky

207 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 6, 1962

Thus, in Brown v. … Brown v. Schleier, supra; Wingert v. First National Bank of Hagerstown, Md., 175 F. 739 (4th Cir., 1909), app. dismissed 223 U.S. 670 , 32 S.Ct. 391 , 56 L.Ed. 605 (1912). Hence, in Brown v.

Joseph v. Community Action Commission to Help the Economy, Inc.

503 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1980

Powe v. Miles, 407 F.2d 73, 81 (2d Cir. 1968). … See Graseck v. Mauceri, 582 F.2d 203 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied sub nom. Graseck v. Middlemiss, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1048 , 59 L.Ed.2d 91 (1979).”

Duke v. United States

396 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 1975

United States v. Brown, 470 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1972). … See, United States v. Virga, 426 F.2d 1320 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Holder, 412 F.2d 212 (2d Cir. 1969). In the present case, the Court’s practice clearly complied with Brown, Virga and Holder, supra.

United States ex rel. Grau v. Uhl

262 F. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 8, 1919

Minnesota v. Brundage, 180 U. S. 499 [21 Sup. Ct. 455, 45 L. Ed. 639 ]; Baker v. Grice, 169 U. S. 284 [18 Sup. Ct. 323, 42 L. … Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U. S. 228, 235 [16 Sup. Ct. 977, 41 L. Ed. 140 ].

Coastwise S. S. Co. v. Ætna Ins. Co.

161 F. 871 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1908

The cases mentioned under the second point were the Western Transit Co. v. Brown (D. C.) 152 Fed. 476 ; The Niobe, 7 Asp. M. C. N. S. 89. … In Western Transit Co. v. Brown, the libellant, the owner of the steamer Troy, sought to recover the damages paid in consequence of a decision adjudging her partly in fault. Minnesota S. S. Co. v.

De Loraine v. MEBA Pension Trust

355 F. Supp. 89 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 21, 1973

After reciting these facts, plaintiff alleges that although the 1970 regulation changes were “technically promulgated by the board of trustees” of MEBA, eight of the board members were union representatives, one of whom, … the union president, was and is the chairman of the board.