Case law

Browne-Vintners Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.

151 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1957

H. v. … H. v.

In Re Alcon Shareholder Litigation

719 F. Supp. 2d 280 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 2010

Co. v. Amerford Int’l Corp., 22 F.3d 458, 462 (2d Cir.1994) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962)). … Foman, 371 U.S. at 182 , 83 S.Ct. 227 ; see also Richardson Greenshields Sec., Inc. v.

Child v. Beame

412 F. Supp. 593 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 20, 1976

Id. 29-30 , 93 S.Ct. 1295 , quoting Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 29 . Id. 411 U.S. 36 , 93 S.Ct. 1298 . 30 . … Chance v. Board of Examiners, 458 F.2d 1167, 1175 (2d Cir. 1972). 71 . Id. 1177 . 72 .

Singleton v. Abramson

336 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 11, 1971

Mahoney v. Fisher, 277 F.2d 5, 6 (2d Cir. 1960). As was stated in Barrett v. … The Rules and Regulations of the Fund state in Article V, section 3, that the Chairman of the Fund shall "with the approval of a majority of the Board of Trustees, appoint and remove, employ and discharge, and fix compensation

Weingarten v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.

680 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 22, 2010

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., All U.S. 242, 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); White v. ABCO Eng’g Corp., 221 F.3d 293 , 300 (2d Cir.2000); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). 22 . Celotex Corp. v. … Airways Ltd. v. British Airways PLC, 257 F.3d 256, 273 (2d Cir.2001). 23 . See, e.g., Nora Beverages, Inc. v. Perrier Group of Am., Inc., 269 F.3d 114 , 123-24 (2d Cir.2001); Raskin v.

Touchtunes Music Corp. v. Rowe International Corp.

676 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 2009

See Robbins v. H.H. Brown Shoe Co., No. 08 Civ. 6885(WHP), 2009 WL 2170174 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2009). … Prejudice to TouchTunes Although the Examiner issued a final rejection of the four Arachnid patents under reexamination, Arachnid is entitled to, and is pursuing, an appeal from that rejection before the Board of Patent Appeals

United States v. Gano Moore Co.

28 F.2d 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 1927

The proof of this is that another Shipping Board boat, viz. the West Cajoot, was placed “on orders” at 10 a m. of August 6, and did not receive her fuel for 18 days thereafter. … This might be true, if the Shipping Board had then been in a position to supply the Effna, and the vessels ahead of her, with the oil needed for the voyage. United States v. Bowring & Co. (D. C.) 26 F (2d) 91.

Farber v. Zenith Laboratories, Inc.

777 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1991

See also Getter v. … v.

In Re Union Carbide Corporation Gas Plant Disaster

634 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1986

(Brown Aff. at 3-4). 16 Mr. … Dowling v.

St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical Center v. Division of Human Rights of the Executive Department

553 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1982

In Browning Debenture Holders’ Com. v. … United Mine Workers v.

Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exchange

561 F. Supp. 379 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 1983

Daniel v. Board of Trade, 164 F.2d 815, 819-20 (7th Cir.1947); P.J. Taggares Co. v. New York Mercantile Exchange, supra, 476 F.Supp. at 76 . … Board of Trade, supra, 164 F.2d at 818, 820. In Smith v.

McWilliams v. The Vim

12 F. 906 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 20, 1882

Brown, D. J. The weight of testimony is that the Spartel made no change in her course except the usual change in the vicinity of Sand’s point from W. S. W. to S. W. ⅛ S. … Schofield, the pilot, who was on board the Spartel, says the collision “was to the west of Sand’s point, about half a mile from it.”

United States ex rel. Thomas v. Deegan

282 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 1968

Coffey v. Fay, 344 F.2d 625, 629-31 (2d Cir. 1965). . Gemmel v. Buchkoe, 358 F.2d 338 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 962 , 87 S.Ct. 402 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966); Trujillo v. … Jenkins v. Follette, 257 F.Supp. 533 (S.D.N.Y.1965); United States ex rel. Reina v. New York State Division of Parole, 238 F.Supp. 263, 265 (S.D.N.Y.1965). . Shuttlesworth v.

Unigard Security Insurance v. North River Insurance

762 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 23, 1991

Accordingly, all such information was deemed proprietary and confidential by the Board of Directors. … On October 19, 1984, Brown wrote on behalf of Unigard to John F.

United States v. Clare

108 F. Supp. 307 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1952

Beekman, 155 F.2d 580, 584 ; United States v. … United States of America v.

The Romp

20 F. Cas. 1144 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1845

McLaughlin, 2 Wend. 596 , and Gardner v. Adams, 12 Wend. 297 ; 2 Kent, Comm. 513-532. … New York & Jersey Steamboat Ferry Co. v. Jersey Co., Hopk. Ch. 460; Van *1148 Rensselaer v. Stafford, Id. 569; Gouverneur v. Lynch, 2 Paige, 300 .

Malony v. City of Milwaukee

1 F. 611 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 1880

The point arose, and was expressly ruled in favor of the jurisdiction by Judge Emmons, in the case of The Avon, 1 Brown’s Adm. Rep. 170. … Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1 ; The Montello, 11 Wall. 411 ; The Lottawanna, 21 Wall. 558 . 2.

United States v. Arnold Bernstein S. S. Line

44 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 20, 1941

In United States v. J. H. … Ltd., v. Stranahan, 214 U.S. 320 , 29 S.Ct. 671 , 53 L.Ed. 1013 ; United States v. New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co. 269 U.S. 304 , 46 S.Ct. 114 , 70 L.Ed. 281 ; Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v.

The Niel Maersk

18 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 13, 1936

The lower layer of boards was about two feet apart and in the upper there were spaces between the boards of two to four inches. … Co. v. Wilbur (C.C.A.) 9 F.(2d) 622 ; Bank Line v. Porter (The Poleric), 25 F.(2d) 843 (C.C.A. 4).

Greenidge v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

263 F. Supp. 2d 696 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 2003

See, e.g., Brown v. United States, No. 01 Civ. 9864, 2002 WL 1836752 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2002); Cruz v. United States Dep’t. of Justice, No. 00 Civ. 0919, 2002 WL 986861 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y. … May 14, 2002); Madera-Lora v. McElroy, No. 02 Civ. 0309, 2002 WL 1766450 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2002); see also Gomes v.