Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.46s
Touchtunes Music Corp. v. Rowe International Corp.
676 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 2009
See Robbins v. H.H. Brown Shoe Co., No. 08 Civ. 6885(WHP), 2009 WL 2170174 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2009). … Prejudice to TouchTunes Although the Examiner issued a final rejection of the four Arachnid patents under reexamination, Arachnid is entitled to, and is pursuing, an appeal from that rejection before the Board of Patent Appeals
Cited 23 timesPublishedUnited States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
842 F. Supp. 1550 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 2, 1994
United States v. IBT, 803 F.Supp. at 769 . . … See United States v. IBT, 803 F.Supp. at 768 ; Consent Decree § G. .
Cited 13 timesPublishedBrowne-Vintners Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.
151 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1957
H. v. … H. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWorld Trade Center Properties LLC v. American Airlines, Inc.
905 F. Supp. 2d 547 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 21, 2012
At 5:43 a.m., they received their Flight 5930 boarding passes at the U.S. … Alfaro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 210 F.3d 111, 114 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Strauss v. Belle Realty Co., 65 N.Y.2d 399 , 402, 492 N.Y.S.2d 555 , 482 N.E.2d 34 (1985); Palsgraf v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedApplied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
425 F. Supp. 1145 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 3, 1977
Milgo’s Board did not respond directly to ADDS’ communication. … In Marshel v. AFW Fabric Corp. 43 and Green v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedMorrison v. Eminence Capital, LLC
238 F. Supp. 3d 542 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 1, 2017
In Gollust v. … In Un-termeyer v.
Cited 1 timesPublished327 F. Supp. 1318 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 21, 1971
Perez v. Follette, 58 Misc.2d 319, 321 , 295 N.Y.S.2d 231, 233 (Sup.Ct., Dutchess County, 1968); aff’d People ex rel. Perez v. … Defendants rely heavily on Rigney v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States v. International Business Machines Corp.
71 F.R.D. 88 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 6, 1976
Brueck was served with the IBM subpoena, the MRI Board of Directors adopted the following resolution: *91 RESOLVED that, it having been brought to the attention of the Board of Directors that Robert L. … C. v. Blaine, 308 F.Supp. 932 (N.D.Ga.1970), it is unlikely that a mere declaration like that of the MRI Board could retroactively relieve Mr. Brueck of his obligation under the subpoena.
Cited 14 timesPublishedUnited States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
165 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 29, 1958
See United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 340 U.S. 76, 88-89 , 71 S.Ct. 160 , 95 L.Ed. 89 ; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U.S. 392, 400-401 , 68 S.Ct. 12 , 92 L.Ed. 20 . See also United States v. W. … Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 ; Perlman v. Feldmann, 2 Cir., 219 F.2d 173 , 50 A.L.R.2d 1134 . certiorari denied, 349 U.S. 952 , 75 S.Ct. 880 , 99 L.Ed. 1277 .
Cited 5 timesPublished852 F. Supp. 211 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1994
See INS v. Stevie, 467 U.S. 407 , 104 S.Ct. 2489 , 81 L.Ed.2d 321 (1984). … See Board Decision, supra, at 4. The Supreme Court clearly rejected this standard in Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. at 449-50 , 107 S.Ct. at 1222 . See also Rasool v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Deutsches Kal-Isyndikat Gesellschaft
31 F.2d 199 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 5, 1929
See affidavit of Rodriguez Barteault; Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. U. S. Sugar Equalization Board (D. C.) 268 F. 575 ; Sloan Shipyards Corporation v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U. S. 549 , 42 S. … See United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 275 U. S. 415, 426 , 48 S. Ct. 198 , 72 L. Ed. 345 ; U. S. Shipping Board E. F. Corp. v. Wood (C. C. A.) 274 F. 893, 902 .
Cited 24 timesPublished969 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 16, 1997
Jesse Blumenthal, a New York State Workers’ Compensation Board physician, examined Trumps on April 16. … As the Second Circuit observed in F.D.I.C. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedAbu Dhabi Commercial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
921 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 2013
Moor v. … Government Accounting Standards Board, Summary of Statement No. 14 at 1, http://www.gasb.org/sV summary/gstsml 4.html. See also Treadstone Capital Mgmt, L.P. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n
246 F. Supp. 849 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 10, 1964
Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 , 80 S.Ct. 1502 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1959); Cf. Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1 , 58 S.Ct. 773 , 82 L.Ed. 1129 (1950). … United States v. United Steelworkers of America, 271 F.2d 676 at 681-682 (3d Cir. 1959), aff’d. United Steelworkers of America v. United States, supra.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWells Fargo Securities, LLC v. LJM Investment Fund, L.P.
District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 26, 2023
MAYER | BROWN Mayer Brown LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas … Id.; see also SST Global Technology, LLC v. Chapman, 270 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWirtz v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees Union, Local 6
265 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1967
Wirtz v. Local Unions No. 406, etc., 254 F. Supp. 962, 965 (E.D.La.1966); Wirtz v. Local 30, etc., 242 F.Supp. 631 (S.D.N.Y. 1965), remanded on other grounds, 366 F.2d 438 (2d Cir. 1966); Goldberg v. … Wirtz v. Local Unions 545, etc., 366 F.2d 435 , 436 (2d Cir. 1966).
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Thomas v. Deegan
282 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 3, 1968
Coffey v. Fay, 344 F.2d 625, 629-31 (2d Cir. 1965). . Gemmel v. Buchkoe, 358 F.2d 338 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 962 , 87 S.Ct. 402 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 (1966); Trujillo v. … Jenkins v. Follette, 257 F.Supp. 533 (S.D.N.Y.1965); United States ex rel. Reina v. New York State Division of Parole, 238 F.Supp. 263, 265 (S.D.N.Y.1965). . Shuttlesworth v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFederal Maritime Commission v. Caragher
243 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 15, 1965
to exercise the power of subpoena * * * antecedent to the filing of any complaint on the board’s own motion. * * * At present, the statute does not clearly authorize the board to exercise its power of subpoena in advance … Lee v. Federal Maritime Board .upon which the petitioner relies does not require a different result.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Union Carbide Corporation Gas Plant Disaster
634 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1986
(Brown Aff. at 3-4). 16 Mr. … Dowling v.
Cited 52 timesPublished927 F. Supp. 718 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 1996
The members of the Advisory Board would be eligible to participate in an Advisory Board Stock Purchase Plan, which set aside two million shares of common stock for purchase by them at prices to be fixed by the board of directors … See Zissu v. Bear, Steams & Co., 627 F.Supp. 687, 692 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd in part, 805 F.2d 75 (2d Cir.1986); Barnebey v. E.F. Hutton Co., 715 F.Supp. 1512, 1522-23 (M.D.Fla.1989); cf. Weinberg v.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna