Case law

The Titanic

206 F. 500 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 3, 1913

Judge Blatchford, in Bischoffscheim v. Baltzer (C. … For this the supposed warrant lies in some language of Judge Brown in United States v. Fifty Boxes and Packages of Face (D. C.) 92 Fed. 601 .

Crichton v. United States

56 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 25, 1944

On June 29, 1938, fhe Joint Board recommended denial of the application. … Co. of Hartford v.

Murphy v. 253 Garth Tenants Corp.

579 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 1983

New York City Board of Education v. Batista, 54 N.Y.2d 379 , 446 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 3 n., 430 N.E.2d 877 (Ct.App. 1981) (quoting Pace College v. … V, § 3, transfer of the shares.

United States v. American Trading Co.

56 F.2d 252 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 17, 1932

C. 1548, 1549, 1550; Hurlbut v. Turnure (D. C.) 76 F. 587, 588 ; Id., 81 F. 208 (C. C. A. 2). … Motion granted on authority of United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U. S. 1, 20 , 47 S. Ct. 1 , 71 L. Ed. 131 ; and United *257 States v. Worley, 281 U. S. 339, 344 , 50 S. Ct. 291 , 74 L. Ed. 887 .

In re Gourary

148 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1957

Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 . . Cf. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 , 68 S.Ct. 1 , 92 L.Ed. 10 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. … V.

Ferro v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

183 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 1960

Co. v. Day, 1959, 360 U.S. 548 , 79 S.Ct. 1322 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1422 ; Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 1950, 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L. Ed. 795 ; cf. Felter v. … Edwards v. Capital Airlines, Inc., 84 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 176 F.2d 755 , certio *421 rari denied, 1949, 338 U.S. 885 , 70 S.Ct. 186 , 94 L.Ed. 543 (review on merits granted where court found system board biased).

Jacobs v. District Director of Internal Revenue

217 F. Supp. 104 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 1963

United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Brown, 207 F.Supp. 139 (E.D.La.1962); Roseberry v. Fredell, 174 F.Supp. 937 (E.D.Ky.1959); Browne v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 168 F.Supp. 796 (N.D.Ill.1959). … Hofheimer v. McIntee, 179 F.2d 789 (7 Cir.), cert. denied Johnston v. McIntee, 340 U.S. 817 , 71 S.Ct. 47 , 95 L.Ed. 600 , rehearing denied 340 U.S. 885 , 71 S.Ct. 192 , 95 L.Ed. 642 (1950); Lesnik v.

United States Ex Rel. Hunter v. Follette

307 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1969

Although since Griffin v. … Washington State Board of Prison, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Draper v.

Ex parte Gilroy

257 F. 110 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 28, 1919

De Lacey v. United States, 249 Fed. 625 , 161 C. C. A. 535 , L. R. A. 1918E, 1011; Ex parte Graber (D. C.) 247 Fed. 882 ; Minotto v. Bradley (D. C.) 252 Fed. 600 ; Ex parte Fronklin (D. C.) 253 Fed. 984 . … —Reasons for and Effect of Glassification. * * *—The effect of classification in class V is to grant exemption or discharge from draft.” “Section 79.—Class V.—Miscellaneous. * * * “Rule XII.

McBride v. Roland

248 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1965

Warren v. Arzt, D.C., 18 F.R.D. 11 ). … Parker v. Lester, 9 Cir., 227 F.2d 708 , United States v. Gray, 9 Cir., 207 F.2d 237 .

Robert W. Stark, Jr., Inc. v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

346 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1972

Charge V accuses Mr. … Matter of Lamborn v. New York Cotton Exchange, 203 App.Div. 565 , 197 N.Y.S. 57 ; Stein v. Marks, 44 Misc. 140 , 89 N.Y.S. 921 .

Lewis v. Valley

476 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1979

if interested Board members were disqualified from voting on this question. … Nor does the mere involvement of Board members in the transaction or transactions attacked mean that demand need not be made. See Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 (S.D.N.Y.1975).

Patterson v. Anderson

20 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 30, 1937

Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 172 , 55 S.Ct. 127 , 75 L.Ed. 264 ; Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441 , 56 S.Ct. 767 , 80 L.Ed. 1268 , 105 A.L.R. 756 . … Commercial Union v. Anglo-South American Bank, 10 F.(2d) 937 (C.C.A.2).

Suthers v. Amgen Inc.

441 F. Supp. 2d 478 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 19, 2006

Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., 947 F.2d 595, 599 (2d Cir.1991) (citing Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc., 132 A.D.2d 162, 168 , 521 N.Y.S.2d 672 (1st Dep’t 1987)). … Under the' “common rule”, the investigator is answerable to his or her “institutional review board”. 45 C.F.R. § 46.109 .

McGuire v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

247 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 1965

See, e. g., National Labor Relations Board v. Aluminum Tubular Corp., 2 Cir., 299 F.2d 595, 598-600 ; National Labor Relations Board v. McFarland, 10 Cir., 306 F.2d 219 ; Cruse Motors Inc., 105 N.L.R.B. 242 , 247. … The Board of Arbitrators, after distinguisk-ing, inter alia, Glendale, supra, and differentiating between grievance adjustment and collective bargaining (citing Hughes Tool Co. v.

In re Letters of Rogatory Issued by the Director of Inspection of the Government of India

272 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 17, 1967

Two of the institutions he and the corporation did business with are Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co. and The Chase Manhattan Bank. … Gadgil v. Lal & Co., 53 I.T.R. 231 (1964), indicating that income-tax assessment enquiries are not this type of judicial proceeding and hence not the “proceeding” contemplated by Section 1782.

United States v. Colon

111 F. Supp. 2d 439 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 6, 2000

Brown Aff., Ex. C (transcript of dispatch) 1. 10 . Id. 11 . Def. Mem. in Support of his Motion to Dismiss ("Def.Mem.”) 3. 12 . See, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); United States v. … Brown Aff., Ex. A, 5. 25 . See Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. at-, 120 S.Ct. at 1377 ("So far as the record reveals, there is no audio recording of the tip, and nothing is known about the informant.”). 26 . See Illinois v.

Irving Bank Corp. v. Bank of New York Co., Inc.

692 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 2, 1988

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia circuit affirmed the Board’s order. Irving Bank Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 845 F.2d 1035 (D.C.Cir.1988). … In Copperweld Corp. v.

United States ex rel. D'Amato v. Williams

193 F. 228 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 12, 1909

He has been denied any hearing before the board of special inquiry, and at least he *231 was entitled to a determination upon that issue. … Under Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U. S. 8 , 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369 , it seems to me that, once 1 have taken jurisdiction, I must dispose of the question as to the alien’s freedom.

Continental Bank & Trust Co. of Salt Lake City v. Garfinkle

292 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 29, 1968

Defendants’ only serious argument is disposed of by our Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 405 F.2d 200 (2d Cir. May 29, 1968). … Defendants contend that because the whole board of directors of International knew the facts of the sale on which plaintiff here relies, no fraud occurred because the corporation is bound by the knowledge of its board of