Case law

The John Tucker

13 F. Cas. 900 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1871

This probable condition of things was called to the attention of those on board of the ship, while they were mooring her, by those on board of the steamboat, but, notwithstanding that, she was moored so as to have her jib-boom … Union Steamship Co. v. New York & V. Steamship Co., 24 How. [65 U. S] 307; The Morning Light, 2 Wall. [69 U. S] 550; The Louisiana, 3 Wall. [70 U. S] 164; Vantine v.

Gilliard v. New York Public Library System

597 F. Supp. 1069 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 6, 1984

Chardon v. Fernandez, supra, 454 U.S. 6 , 102 S.Ct. 28 , 70 L.Ed.2d 6 ; Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University of New York, supra, 654 F.2d 856 . … Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, Int’l Ass’n of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, 376 F.2d 337, 339-40 (6th Cir.1967), aff'd, 390 U.S. 557 , 88 S.Ct. 1235 , 20 L.Ed.2d 126 (1968). See also Brown v.

Diatel v. Gleason

22 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 1, 1937

Co. v. Marvin, 6 Cir., 59 F. 91 , Cornell Co. v. Ward, 2 Cir., 168 F. 51 , Dodge v. North Hudson, 177 F. 986 , C.C.N.Y., Mattison v. Boston & Maine R. R., 205 F. 821 , D.C.N.Y., Brown v. Boston & Maine R. … Wilson v. Tootle, 55 F. 211 , C.C.Mo.; McCarty v. New York, L. E. & W. R. Co., 62 F. 437 , C.C.N.Y.; Pearson v. Norfolk & W. R. Co., 286 F. 429 , D.C.Va.; Brown v. Chicago & N. W. R.

The Titanic

206 F. 500 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 3, 1913

Judge Blatchford, in Bischoffscheim v. Baltzer (C. … For this the supposed warrant lies in some language of Judge Brown in United States v. Fifty Boxes and Packages of Face (D. C.) 92 Fed. 601 .

Avon Products, Inc. v. Chartwell Associates L.P.

738 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1990

The judicial decision which most directly sparked the legislature’s concern, and prompted the amendment of Section 505(a)(2), was Bank of New York Co., Inc. v. … Avon cites GAF Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp., 624 F.Supp. 1016, 1035 (S.D.N.Y.1985), for the proposition that "nothing in New York law requires even-handed treatment of bidders.” I find this case inapposite.

Visayan Refining Co. v. Standard Transp. Co.

17 F.2d 642 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 10, 1927

Co. v. McFadden, 180 U. S. 533 , 21 S. Ct. 488 , 45 L. Ed. 656 ; Venner v. New York Central R. R. Co. (C. C. A.) 293 F. 373 . … Roberts v. Ely, 113 N. Y. 128 , 20 N. E. 606 .

Crichton v. United States

56 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 25, 1944

On June 29, 1938, fhe Joint Board recommended denial of the application. … Co. of Hartford v.

United States v. American Trading Co.

56 F.2d 252 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 17, 1932

C. 1548, 1549, 1550; Hurlbut v. Turnure (D. C.) 76 F. 587, 588 ; Id., 81 F. 208 (C. C. A. 2). … Motion granted on authority of United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U. S. 1, 20 , 47 S. Ct. 1 , 71 L. Ed. 131 ; and United *257 States v. Worley, 281 U. S. 339, 344 , 50 S. Ct. 291 , 74 L. Ed. 887 .

In re Gourary

148 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1957

Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 . . Cf. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 , 68 S.Ct. 1 , 92 L.Ed. 10 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. … V.

McBride v. Roland

248 F. Supp. 459 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1965

Warren v. Arzt, D.C., 18 F.R.D. 11 ). … Parker v. Lester, 9 Cir., 227 F.2d 708 , United States v. Gray, 9 Cir., 207 F.2d 237 .

Robert W. Stark, Jr., Inc. v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

346 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1972

Charge V accuses Mr. … Matter of Lamborn v. New York Cotton Exchange, 203 App.Div. 565 , 197 N.Y.S. 57 ; Stein v. Marks, 44 Misc. 140 , 89 N.Y.S. 921 .

Lewis v. Valley

476 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1979

if interested Board members were disqualified from voting on this question. … Nor does the mere involvement of Board members in the transaction or transactions attacked mean that demand need not be made. See Brooks v. American Export Industries, Inc., 68 F.R.D. 506 (S.D.N.Y.1975).

Patterson v. Anderson

20 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 30, 1937

Zellerbach Paper Co. v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 172 , 55 S.Ct. 127 , 75 L.Ed. 264 ; Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441 , 56 S.Ct. 767 , 80 L.Ed. 1268 , 105 A.L.R. 756 . … Commercial Union v. Anglo-South American Bank, 10 F.(2d) 937 (C.C.A.2).

Perez v. Costa Armartori, S.P.A.

465 F. Supp. 1211 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 26, 1979

See generally Czaplicki v. The Hoegh Silvercloud (1956) 351 U.S. 525 , 76 S.Ct. 946 , 100 L.Ed. 1387 ; Potomac Electric Power Company v. Wynn (1965), 120 U.S.App.D.C. 13 , 343 F.2d 295 ; Johnson v. … For example, in Toomey v.

Continental Bank & Trust Co. of Salt Lake City v. Garfinkle

292 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 29, 1968

Defendants’ only serious argument is disposed of by our Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 405 F.2d 200 (2d Cir. May 29, 1968). … Defendants contend that because the whole board of directors of International knew the facts of the sale on which plaintiff here relies, no fraud occurred because the corporation is bound by the knowledge of its board of

DGM Investments, Inc. v. New York Futures Exchange, Inc.

288 F. Supp. 2d 519 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 23, 2003

For instance, in Korwek v. … Korwek v. Hunt, 646 F.Supp. at 972 (quoting ACLI Int’l Commodity Servs., Inc. v. Banque Populaire Suisse, 550 F.Supp. 144 (S.D.N.Y.1982)). 3 See also Michelson v.

Suthers v. Amgen Inc.

441 F. Supp. 2d 478 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 19, 2006

Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., 947 F.2d 595, 599 (2d Cir.1991) (citing Mandelblatt v. Devon Stores, Inc., 132 A.D.2d 162, 168 , 521 N.Y.S.2d 672 (1st Dep’t 1987)). … Under the' “common rule”, the investigator is answerable to his or her “institutional review board”. 45 C.F.R. § 46.109 .

American Cyanamid Co. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.

331 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 1971

Bondy v. Harvey, 62 F.2d 521, 524 (2 Cir.), cert. den. sub. nom. Harvey v. Bondy, 289 U. S. 740 , 53 S.Ct. 659 , 77 L.Ed. 1487 (1933); Borg-Warner Corp. v. … Society of Canton, Ltd. v.

McGuire v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

247 F. Supp. 113 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 1965

See, e. g., National Labor Relations Board v. Aluminum Tubular Corp., 2 Cir., 299 F.2d 595, 598-600 ; National Labor Relations Board v. McFarland, 10 Cir., 306 F.2d 219 ; Cruse Motors Inc., 105 N.L.R.B. 242 , 247. … The Board of Arbitrators, after distinguisk-ing, inter alia, Glendale, supra, and differentiating between grievance adjustment and collective bargaining (citing Hughes Tool Co. v.

In re Letters of Rogatory Issued by the Director of Inspection of the Government of India

272 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 17, 1967

Two of the institutions he and the corporation did business with are Brown Brothers, Harriman & Co. and The Chase Manhattan Bank. … Gadgil v. Lal & Co., 53 I.T.R. 231 (1964), indicating that income-tax assessment enquiries are not this type of judicial proceeding and hence not the “proceeding” contemplated by Section 1782.