Case law

Murphy v. 253 Garth Tenants Corp.

579 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 1983

New York City Board of Education v. Batista, 54 N.Y.2d 379 , 446 N.Y.S.2d 1 , 3 n., 430 N.E.2d 877 (Ct.App. 1981) (quoting Pace College v. … V, § 3, transfer of the shares.

Braadt v. City of New York

260 F. Supp. 826 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 23, 1966

Through three courts, plaintiff argued that his waiver was not voluntary, and that since he was a seaman, the Board’s jurisdiction was unconstitutional. He lost each time. Braadt v. … We feel that Hoffman v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 74 F.2d 227, 230 (2 Cir. 1934) (dictum), still controls in this circuit as to the res judicata effect of a decision of a workmen’s compensation board.

Smith v. Stevens

957 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 2013

Danielewicz v. … Ass’n v.

Monsanto v. United States

143 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 2001

Accord Lanier, 220 F.3d at 838-39 ; United States v. Brown, 202 F.3d 691, 699 (4th Cir.2000); United States v. … His position finds support in United States v. Brown, 202 F.3d 691 (4th Cir.2000).

Martha Graham School & Dance Foundation, Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc.

153 F. Supp. 2d 512 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 2001

Although the Martha Graham School and the Martha Graham Center ostensibly maintained separate boards and separate accounting books, membership on the two *516 boards was frequently identical; board meetings for the Boards … On June 22, 2000, the Board voted to remove Protas from the Board of Directors.

Goodrich v. Norris

10 F. Cas. 609 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1848

lading containing an exaggerated statement of the quantity of goods received; and that such evidence will defeat an action for the recovery of an alleged deficiency in the delivery made, is well settled by the case of Bates v. … The case of Berkely v. Watling, 7 Adol. & E. 29, is somewhat broader.

United States v. Mannino

487 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 1980

In Chambers v. … When he removed the book from the white plastic bag, he saw the brown paper bag inside. Because of the weight and the shape of the items in the brown bag, he became aware that it contained guns.

United States ex rel. Dare Bok Fun v. Director of Immigration & Naturalization

32 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1939

Fong Lung Sing v. … Tisi v. Tod, 264 U.S. 131 , 44 S.Ct. 260 , 68 L.Ed. 590 .” Mr. Justice Hughes in Tang Tun v.

United States v. Goodfellow

320 F. Supp. 812 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1970

substitute for board action. … In a very similar case, Helden v.

House of York, Ltd. v. Ring

322 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 1970

State Board of Equalization of State of California v. Young’s Market Co., 299 U.S. 59 , 57 S.Ct. 77 , 81 L.Ed. 38 (1936); Mahoney v. … In following the ratio decidendi of Brown v.

United States Ex Rel. Hunter v. Follette

307 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 27, 1969

Although since Griffin v. … Washington State Board of Prison, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Draper v.

Medalha v. Shaughnessy

102 F. Supp. 950 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 1951

On May 15, 1951, petitioner appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals. … Trinler v.

Persico v. Daley

239 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1965

The statute was so construed in Penuelas v. Moreno, 198 F. Supp. 441 (S.D.Cal.1961). … Penuelas v. Moreno, supra, supports defendants’ contention. The law in this circuit, however, appears to be to the contrary. Holdeman v. Sheldon, 204 F.Supp. 890 (S.D.N.Y. 1962), aff’d, 311 F.2d 2 (2d Cir. 1962).

Globus, Inc. v. Jaroff

271 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 7, 1967

Texas Gulf Sulphur Corp., 258 F.Supp. 262 (S.D.N.Y.1966); Simon v. New Haven Board & Carton Co., 250 F.Supp. 297 (D.Conn.1966); Dembitzer v. … Ruckle v. Roto American, supra; Simon v. New Haven Board & Carton Co., supra.

Austin v. Calhoon

360 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 1973

These doubts were substantially resolved in Smith v. … See O’Rourke v.

Garland v. United States

450 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1978

McBride, 560 F.2d 7 (1st Cir. 1977); Andrino v. United States Board of Parole, 550 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1977). … . § 4208 (a)(2) in order to increase the Board’s discretion, not to limit it. See Richards v.

Nahodil v. Rodman

432 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1977

U.S.A. v. Brookhaven, 134 F.2d 442 (C.C.A. 5th 1943); Belt v. Holton, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 197 F.2d 579 (1952); Askins v. Overholser, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 170 F.2d 815 (1948); Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. … In Treasure Imports v.

Dorchester Financial Holdings Corp. v. Banco BRJ S.A.

304 F.R.D. 178 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 2014

See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); see also Kiobel v. … See, e.g., Aliki Foods, LLC v.

Rubio v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.

254 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2003

See Madden v. … Co. v.

In re Filer

125 F. 261 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. I have carefully examined the authorities cited in opposition to the claim of Kohn & Co., in the seventh paragraph, and do not think them applicable. … Bayley v. Wilkins, 7 C. B. 886; Westropp v. Solomon, 8 C. B. 345; Smith v. Ludio, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 587; Brittian v. Lloyd, 14 M. & W. 762; Perin v. Parker, 126 Ill. 201 , 18 N. E. 747 , 2 L. R. A. 336, 9 Am. St.