Case law

Levin v. National Basketball Association

385 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1974

Action by the Board on a transfer of membership requires the affirmative vote of three-quarters of the members of the Board. … Radovich v. National Football League, 352 U.S. 445 , 77 S.Ct. 390 , 1 L.Ed.2d 456 (1957). 3 . Denver Rockets v. All-Pro Management, Inc., 325 F.Supp. 1049 (C.D.Cal.1971). 4 . Ace Beer Distributors, Inc. v.

Petrol Corporation v. Groupement D'Achat Des Car.

84 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 2, 1949

Such behavior is highly improper when the award is to be made by a board of arbitrators which is to act as a unit in hearing and deciding the case. Noffsinger v. Thompson, 1936, 98 Colo. 154 , 54 P.2d 683 . … Seldner Corporation v. W. R. Grace & Co., D.C.Md., 1938, 22 F.Supp. 388 . The federal arbitration statute, however, does not prescribe the composition of an arbitration board or the form of its proceedings.

United States v. Degraffenreid

344 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 1972

United States v. Sandbank, 403 F.2d 38, 40 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied 394 U.S. 961 , 89 S.Ct. 1301 , 22 L.Ed.2d 562 (1969); United States v. … United States, 396 U.S. 295 , 90 S.Ct. 506 , 24 L.Ed.2d 532 (1970) and Breen v. Selective Service Local Board, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970) as well as Local Board Memoranda Nos. 101 (Govt.

R. G. Packard Co. v. Commissioners of the Palisades Interstate Park

240 F. 543 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 1916

Under the act, a board of commissioners was created a body politic, with power to sue and be sued. Sections 2 and 5 provide, among other things, as follows: “See. 2. … Co., Ltd., v. Regents of the University of Idaho (D. C.) 199 Fed. 509 , makes unnecessary further citations or references.

Board of Trustees of the AGMA Health Fund v. AETNA Life Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 2024

United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995). … Supp. 3d at 706; Encyclopedia Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Off., Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).

White v. ABCO Engineering Corp.

992 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 26, 1998

As the Court held in Robinson v. … Plaintiff points to Brown v.

Nye v. A/S D/S Svendborg

358 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 1973

Under maritime law the owner of a ship owes a duty of reasonable care to all who are on board and boarding for purposes not inimical to the shipowner’s legitimate interests. Kermarec v. … And a failure to ask for better conditions in boarding and descending can be contributory negligence. Davis v.

Korzenik v. Marrow

401 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 1975

This complex method for selecting the non-partisan candidate for Mayor, members of the Village and Town Boards, and Police Justice, has remained in effect, with minor changes, until the present. … Brown v. O’Brien, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 157 , 469 F.2d 563 , 572, judg. vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 1 , 93 S.Ct. 67 , 34 L.Ed.2d 72 (1972).

Mahoney v. Hankin

593 F. Supp. 1171 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 20, 1984

Further, Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982), held that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … East Hartford Educational Association v. Board of Education, 562 F.2d 838, 843 , vacated on rehearing en banc, 562 F.2d 856 (2d Cir.1977).

Meyerson v. Contracting Plumbers Ass'n of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.

606 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1985

Board. … The Plumbing Industry Board has standing in this action. See Nedd v. United Mine Workers, 556 F.2d 190, 197 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 757 (1978); Livolsi v.

In re Knickerbocker Steamboat Co.

136 F. 956 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 7, 1905

Seventh: When last had there been a fire drill with the apparatus and hose on board; .had all the men employed on board on June 15th, 1904, been engaged in the drill and if not all, which ones had been? … As it was only done here by counsel and not by the corporation itself or by any person who might be incriminated as an aider or abetter of the corporation — See United States v. Van Schaick (C.

Rothstein v. Manuti

235 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 6, 1963

The National Labor Relations Board has long taken the position, see Electric Auto-Lite Co., 92 N.L.R.B. 1073 (1950), aff’d, National Labor Relations Board v. … (See Cutler v. American Fed. of Musicians, D.C., 34 F.R.D. 253 (Oct. 24, 1963). C.

Tishman & Lipp, Inc. v. Delta Airlines

275 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 25, 1967

It is beyond dispute that the Board could properly accept tariffs containing exculpatory rules such as are here involved. Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, supra. … Citing Magnin v.

Allred v. Walker

District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 9, 2021

On November 25, 2019, Brown filed a nearly identical shareholder derivative action on behalf of Aclaris alleging substantially similar facts and making substantially similar claims to those made by Allred, see Brown v. … The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to close member case 19-cv-10876, Brown v. Walker et al. SO ORDERED.

Sanluis Developments, L.L.C. v. CCP Sanluis, L.L.C.

556 F. Supp. 2d 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 2008

.”); GE v. Anson Stamping Co., 426 F.Supp.2d 579, 591 (W.D.Ky.2006) (“Anson’s motion to dismiss GE’s motion to vacate is in all respects the practical equivalent of a motion to confirm....”). See also Brown v. … (citing Brown v. Bridgeport Rolling Mitts Co., 245 F.Supp. 41 , 46 n. 8 (D.Conn.1965))).

Stapp v. Resor

314 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 12, 1970

In Kennedy v. … Kennedy v. Secretary of the Navy, su/pra at 992. Thus, even assuming the veracity of the allegations, under the authority of Harmon v.

Chendrimada v. Air-India

802 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 5, 1992

The Supreme Court, in Air France v. … In Margrave v.

Fischler v. McCarthy

117 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1954

] or in case of the contumacy of any witness appearing before the Labor Board, the Board may invoke the aid of any United States District Court’ ”. … In effect all that Robertson v.

United States v. International Business Machines Corp.

83 F.R.D. 97 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 1979

See, e. g., Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134, 143 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 (1928); Austin Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. … In a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals, stating, “[a]s we read the order of the District Court, it duly enforced the Board’s right to call for.documents relevant to the issues of the Board

Schonfeld v. Penza

360 F. Supp. 1228 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 7, 1972

In Mamula v. … This in itself is persuasive evidence that the Trial Board was not impartial. Falcone v. Dantinne, 420 F.2d 1157 (3rd Cir. 1969).