Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

1.11s

  • United States v. Shapiro

    396 F. Supp. 1058 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 25, 1975

    , a conviction based on the board’s 1-A classification must be reversed, [citations omitted]” United States v. … I find that Shapiro’s local board gave no statement whatever of its reasons for denial of his application. Thus the indictment must be dismissed. Lenhard v. United States, supra; Joseph v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martha Graham School & Dance Foundation, Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc.

    153 F. Supp. 2d 512 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 2001

    Although the Martha Graham School and the Martha Graham Center ostensibly maintained separate boards and separate accounting books, membership on the two *516 boards was frequently identical; board meetings for the Boards … On June 22, 2000, the Board voted to remove Protas from the Board of Directors.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen

    754 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 27, 1990

    United States v. … See United States v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Calhoon

    360 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 1973

    These doubts were substantially resolved in Smith v. … See O’Rourke v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • White v. ABCO Engineering Corp.

    992 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 26, 1998

    As the Court held in Robinson v. … Plaintiff points to Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Culbro Corp.

    436 F. Supp. 746 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 1977

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 322 n.38, 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … At the outset of the litigation, Culbro withdrew its nomination of Edgar Cullman, President and Chairman of the Board of Culbro. 10 Subsequently, it agreed to forego nominating any Culbro director to either Board, leaving

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. DUTCHESS CTY. DEPT. OF HEALTH

    105 F. Supp. 2d 258 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 11, 2000

    See generally Justiana v. … Dist. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Strougo Ex Rel. the Brazil Fund, Inc. v. Padegs

    27 F. Supp. 2d 442 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 18, 1998

    In Kaplan v. … See Stein v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • United States v. Goodfellow

    320 F. Supp. 812 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 28, 1970

    substitute for board action. … In a very similar case, Helden v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.

    310 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 2004

    Auth. v. … Datron, Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Witt v. Village of Mamaroneck

    992 F. Supp. 2d 350 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2014

    Corp. v. … Millar v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n of Basketball Referees v. Middleton

    688 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 18, 1988

    Lewis v. International Broth. of Teamsters, 826 F.2d 1310, 1313 (3rd Cir.1987). See also Kinney v. International Broth. of Electrical Workers, 669 F.2d 1222 (9th Cir.1987); Grasty v. … International Union v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Crosland v. City of New York

    140 F. Supp. 2d 300 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 16, 2001

    Finnegan v. Board of Educ., 30 F.3d 273 , 274 (2d Cir.1994); see also Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. … Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983)); Riedinger v. D'Amicantino, 974 F.Supp. 322, 326 (S.D.NY.1997) (same).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Meyerson v. Contracting Plumbers Ass'n of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.

    606 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1985

    Board. … The Plumbing Industry Board has standing in this action. See Nedd v. United Mine Workers, 556 F.2d 190, 197 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 757 (1978); Livolsi v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen v. Gallante

    912 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 30, 1996

    See Marshall v. Snyder, 572 F.2d 894, 901 (2d Cir.1978); Gilliam v. Edwards, 492 F.Supp. 1255, 1266-67 (D.N.J.1980). … No. 1 MEBA/NMU v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Robert W. Stark, Jr., Inc. v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

    346 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 20, 1972

    Charge V accuses Mr. … Matter of Lamborn v. New York Cotton Exchange, 203 App.Div. 565 , 197 N.Y.S. 57 ; Stein v. Marks, 44 Misc. 140 , 89 N.Y.S. 921 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Midway Airlines, Inc. v. County of Westchester

    584 F. Supp. 436 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 19, 1984

    V 1981). 4 . 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976 & Supp. V 1981). 5 . 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (1976). 6 . U.S. Const, art. VI, cl. 2. 7 . See 49 U.S.C. § 2210 (West Supp.1983); 14 C.F.R. § 152 App. … United States v. State of New York, 708 F.2d 92, 93 (2d Cir.1983) (quoting Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H.P.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • R. G. Packard Co. v. Commissioners of the Palisades Interstate Park

    240 F. 543 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 14, 1916

    Under the act, a board of commissioners was created a body politic, with power to sue and be sued. Sections 2 and 5 provide, among other things, as follows: “See. 2. … Co., Ltd., v. Regents of the University of Idaho (D. C.) 199 Fed. 509 , makes unnecessary further citations or references.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • ETF Enterprises, Inc. v. Nina Ricci

    523 F. Supp. 1147 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 30, 1981

    Wilson Jones Co. v. Gilbert & Bennett Mfg. Co., 332 F.2d 216, 218 (2d Cir. 1964). Accord Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. … According to plaintiff, unlike Morgan v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Petrol Corporation v. Groupement D'Achat Des Car.

    84 F. Supp. 446 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 2, 1949

    Such behavior is highly improper when the award is to be made by a board of arbitrators which is to act as a unit in hearing and deciding the case. Noffsinger v. Thompson, 1936, 98 Colo. 154 , 54 P.2d 683 . … Seldner Corporation v. W. R. Grace & Co., D.C.Md., 1938, 22 F.Supp. 388 . The federal arbitration statute, however, does not prescribe the composition of an arbitration board or the form of its proceedings.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.