Case law

United States v. Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, Chauffeurs

896 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 18, 1995

Scott, Earl V. Brown, Jr., of counsel), for defendant International Broth. of Teamsters. … In the second phase of the Consent Decree, the Independent Administrator was replaced by a three-member Independent Review Board ("the IRB").

Hanig v. Yorktown Central School District

384 F. Supp. 2d 710 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 2, 2005

At the May 20, 2003 board meeting, the Board of Education accepted plaintiffs resignation and her employment with the School Dictrict terminated at the conclusion of the 2002-03 school year. (Id. ¶¶ 18, 19.) … Law provides that “[e]ach such central school district shall be managed by a board of education,” and that such board members are to be locally elected, not appointed.

Leonard v. Decker

22 F. 741 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 20, 1884

Brown, J. … Co. v. Philadelphia & Havre de Grace Steam Tow-boat Co. 23 How. 209 ; Packet Co. v. Atlee, 2 Dill. 479 ; Atlee v. Packet Co. 21 Wall. 389 .

Snyder v. Home Ins.

133 F. 848 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1904

I think that the admitted breach of the warranty that the canal boat should at all times have a competent watchman on board bars a recovery. The cases of Lewis v. Ætna Ins. Co. (D. C.) 123 Fed. 157 , and Lewis v. … In this case there was an express warranty that the boat should at all times have a competent watchman on board.

Strougo v. Bassini

112 F. Supp. 2d 355 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 8, 2000

Strougo v. … In Kaplan v.

Shenk ex rel. Sirius XM Radio Inc. v. Karmazin

867 F. Supp. 2d 379 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 2011

coming from a shareholder,” Richelson v. … Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Cantor, 724 A.2d 571, 585 (Del.Ch.1998). A board’s decision on compensation is “entitled to great deference,” Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Integrated Health Servs. v.

Rutherford v. Katonah-Lewisboro School District

670 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 3, 2009

Corp. v. … Okin v.

Sub-Contractors Register, Inc. v. McGovern's Contractors & Builders Manual, Inc.

69 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 1946

Mawman v. Tegg, 2 Russ. 393; Spiers v. Brown, 31 Law T. 16; Lawrence v. Dana, 2 Amer.Law T. (N.S.) 402. “The complainant relies upon this criterion here. … Justice Brown quoted what Lord Eldon said in Mawman v.

D'AMICO v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

191 F. Supp. 160 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 1961

Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R., 1950, 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Pitney, 1946, 326 U.S. 561 , 66 S.Ct. 322 , 90 L.Ed. 318 . 3 . Cf. Union Pacific R. R. v. … Butler v. Thompson, 8 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 831 ; Broady v. Illinois Cent. R. R., 7 Cir., 191 F.2d 73 , certiorari denied 1951. 342 U.S. 897 , 72 S.Ct. 231 , 96 L. Ed. 672 ; Brooks v. Chicago, R. I. and P. R.

Sudarsky v. City of New York

779 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 1991

Brady v. Town of Colchester, 863 F.2d 205, 211-12 (2d Cir.1988) (citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-09 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

United States v. Orr

343 F. Supp. 178 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 11, 1972

the Board. 7 The record indicates there was ample basis in fact for the Board’s determination. … by all three Board members who interviewed him.

In Re International Business MacHines Corp. Securities Litigation

954 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 1997

See, e.g., Burton v. Exxon Corp., 583 F.Supp. 405, 415 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (“A decision to declare a dividend is a matter ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the board of directors.”). … See also Kennedy v.

In re Dowie

202 F. 816 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1912

It has been held that a judgment to recover damages for slander is not dischargeable (National Surety Co. v. Medlock, 19 Am. Bankr. Rep. 654, 2 Ga. App. 665 , 58 S. E. 1131 ; McDonald v. Brown, 10 Am. Bankr.

Comolite Corp. v. Davidowitz

30 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 27, 1939

First, as to the Brown patent. … See Colgate v. Western Union Tel. Co., C. C., 19 F. 828 ; Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. Cowles Co., C. C., 64 F. 125 ; Lowell Mfg. Co. v. Hogg, C. C., 70 F. 787 .

United States ex rel. Lee Kum Hoy v. Shaughnessy

123 F. Supp. 674 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 31, 1954

Co. v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250 , 11 S.Ct. 1000 , 35 L.Ed. 734 , Camden & Suburban Railway v. Stetson, 177 U.S. 172 , 20 S.Ct. 617 , supra, Howland v. Beck, 10 Cir., 56 F.2d 35 and Taylor v. … Co. v.

United States v. Muyet

985 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 9, 1998

Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 77 (2d Cir.1997) (Newman, J.). The defendant, of course, has the authority-in the first instance to accept or reject court-appointed representation. … Teague, 953 F.2d 1525, 1531 (11th Cir.1992), cited with approval by Judge Newman in Brown v.

United States v. Riley

88 F. 480 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 5, 1898

In the case of Brown v. … In the case of Brown v.

First Interregional Equity Corp. v. Haughton

805 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 1992

Doherty, in turn, sent the letter to Alex Brown, First Interregional’s clearing broker. … This apparently never happened, and Alex Brown notified First Interregional that OTRA bought-in 700,000 shares of Merlin Baines at $0.50 per share. First Interre-gional paid Alex Brown $350,000 to satisfy the buy-in.

United States v. Seeger

216 F. Supp. 516 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 24, 1963

Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947)) nor has any compulsive religious service been supported (cf. Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 , 82 S.Ct. 1261 , 8 L.Ed.2d 601 (1962)). … Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15, 16 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947); People of State of Ill., ex rel. McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203, 210, 211 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948).

United States v. Meyer

362 F. Supp. 1131 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 12, 1973

United States v. Holby, supra, at 653 . See also United States v. Glover, 286 F.2d 84 (8th Cir. 1961). … “The question of jurisdiction of the local board is reached only if there is no basis in fact for the classification which it gave the registrant.” Estep v.