Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kallir, Philips, Ross, Inc.

420 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1976

Mastro Plastics Corp., 354 F.2d 170 , 178-79 (2d Cir. 1965); NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir. 1963). 13 . EEOC v. Steamfitters Local 638, supra n. 7, 542 F.2d at 579-592; Satty v. … See Sparks v. Griffin, 460 F.2d 433, 443 (5th Cir. 1972); Hegler v. Board of Educ., 447 F.2d 1078, 1081 (8th Cir. 1971); cf. Inda v.

Allied Irish Banks v. Bank of America

240 F.R.D. 96 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 25, 2007

board on the adequacy and scope of the review and its findings.” … United States v. Adlman, 134 F.3d 1194, 1196 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting Hickman v.

Motorola Credit Corp. v. Uzan

739 F. Supp. 2d 636 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 27, 2010

Similarly, on Sep *638 tember 28, 2009, Brown Rudnick informed the Court by letter that Brown Rudnick had no authorization to appear on behalf of defendants. See Letter from May Orenstein, Esq., dated Sept. 28, 2009. … See Superior Transcribing Serv., LLC v. Paul, 72 A.D.3d 675 , 898 N.Y.S.2d 234, 236 (2d Dep’t 2010); see also Eckhaus v. Blauner, No. 94 Civ. 5635(CSH), 1997 WL 362166 , at *6-7, 1997 U.S. Dist.

Boudin v. Thomas

533 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 1982

Brown v. Neagle, 486 F.Supp. 364, 366 (S.D. W.Va.1979). The Brown case is analogous to the instant case in many respects. Ms. … Wolfish v. Levi, 573 F.2d 118, 128-29 (2d Cir. 1978), rev’d, Wolfish, supra; Brown, supra, at 367. Dr. Frank Rundle, a psychiatrist with expertise in prison psychiatry, attests to the fact that “The conditions of Ms.

PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Massimo Razionale; New York City Environmental Control Board; New York City Parking Violations Bureau; New York City Transit Adjudication Bureau

District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 2026

See, e.g., Nationstare Mortgage LLC v. Atanas, 285 F. Supp. 3d 618, 622–623 (W.D.N.Y. 2018) (evaluating compliance with RPAPL notice requirements in a mortgage foreclosure default judgment action); Brown v. … Windward Bora, LLC v. Sotomayor, No. 21 Civ. 7161, 2023 WL 2575582, at *5 (S.D.N.Y.

Berg v. Watson

417 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1976

McGoldrick, who is a member of the Executive Board, neither sat on the Board for the hearing nor participated in the deliberations, as he had personally submitted the charges. … Bender, also a Board member, likewise neither sat on the Board nor participated in the deliberations as he was a witness to the events involved. 4 .

Saltz v. FIRST FRONTIER, LP

782 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 23, 2010

“A claim for deficient management or administration of a fund is ‘a paradigmatic derivative claim.’ ” Albert v. Brown Mgmt. … Id.; see also Albert v. Alex Brown Mgmt.

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United Railroad Workers Division of Transport Workers Union of America

176 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 19, 1959

If such efforts to resolve a minor dispute fail the Mediation Board may remit the parties to the appropriate Adjustment Board for determination. See Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana R. R. … Co. v. Burley, supra.

Lewis v. Roosevelt Island Operating Corp.

246 F. Supp. 3d 979 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2017

Wang v. Office of Prof'l Med. Conduct, N.Y., 354 Fed.Appx. 459 , 460 (2d Cir. 2009) (§ 1981); Feingold v. New York, 366 F.3d 138, 149 (2d Cir. 2004) (§ 1983); Bland v. … Additionally, the Court’s own. research has returned decisions in which claims for negligent hiring and supervision were allowed to proceed against individual board members. See, e.g., Dooley v. Metro.

The Flash

9 F. Cas. 252 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1847

rest, and also detains on board and refuses to deliver, according to the contract of affreightment, the portion taken on board. … Waring v. Clarke, 5 How. [46 U. S.] 441. And it is understood, that in so far as the jurisdiction in rem of the admiralty courts is concerned, that court also held, in the case of New Jersey Steam Nav. Co. v.

Ringgold v. Crocker

20 F. Cas. 813 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 1848

The sendee of the ship is by no means limited to acts done for the benefit of the ship, or in the actual performance of seaman’s duty on board. Reed v. … The George [Case No. 5,329]; Lamson v. Wescott [Id. 8,035]. And the responsibility of the owners personally is co-ordinate with that of the ship. 3 Kent. Comm. (5th Ed.) 133, note; Abb. Shipp. 158, 172. 78b. *815 .

Leigh v. Gerber

86 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1949

Since one who innocently copies from an infringing copy is liable as an infringer to the owner whose unpublished work was infringed, Acosta v. Brown, D.C. S.D.N.Y. 1943, 50 F.Supp. 615 , affirmed De Acosta v. … Champney v. Haag, C.C.E.D. Pa. 1903, 121 F. 944 . Compare dissenting opinion in De Acosta v. Brown, supra, 146 F.2d at page 413 .

Commercial Union Ins. v. M v. Bremen Express

16 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 17, 1998

See Exhibit 8 to Browne Aff. … See Exh. 11 to Browne Aff.

McLeod v. Local 459, International Union of Electrical Workers

338 F. Supp. 1051 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 29, 1972

Petitioner in this case, the Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called “the Board”) seeks an injunction pursuant to Section 10 (Z) of the National Labor Relations Act … B. v. Local 282, International Bro. of Teamsters, 345 F.2d 142 , 145 (2d Cir. 1965); Vincent for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v. Local 25, National Asso. of Broadcast Employees, 321 F.Supp. 1250 (W.D.N.Y.1971). .

Weiss v. Willow Tree Civic Ass'n

467 F. Supp. 803 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 8, 1979

Board. … No. 212 v. Scottsdale Educ. Ass'n, 17 Ariz.App. 504 , 498 P.2d 578 (1972) (right of public employees to petition school board); Farmer v.

Poplardo v. Adelberg

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2023

Hearing Officer Brown (“Brown”) began Plaintiff’s 3020-a hearing (the “Brown Hearing”) in August 2020, and it continued until October 2021. (Id.) … Finley v. Giacobbe, 79 F.3d 1285, 1296 (2d Cir. 1996) (alteration and quotation marks omitted) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)).

Bleecker Associates v. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

544 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 11, 1982

As held by the Court in Ray v. … Worthen Co. v. Kavanaugh, 295 U.S. 56, 60 , 55 S.Ct. 555, 556 , 79 L.Ed. 1298 (1935); Home Building and Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398 , 54 S.Ct. 231 , 78 L.Ed. 413 (1934); Block v.

McLeod v. Chefs, Cooks, Pastry Cooks & Assistants, Local 89, Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union

181 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 9, 1960

It has been held that the requirement placed upon the Board is met by a showing of sufficient evidence to demonstrate that there was basis for the Board’s finding. Douds v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Local 50, Bakery & Confectionery Workers, 2 Cir., 1957, 245 F.2d 542 .

Matthew v. United States

452 F. Supp. 2d 433 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 2006

Brown, 348 U.S. at 110-11 , 75 S.Ct. 141 . The Supreme Court noted that Feres did not overrule Brooks v. … Brown v. United States, No. 04-5171, 2006 WL 2571119 (6th Cir. Sept.8, 2006).

Rivoli Trucking Corp. v. New York Shipping Ass'n

167 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 25, 1956

Primary proceedings charging a defendant, who is subject to the Shipping Act, with a violation of the Shipping Act must be brought before the Federal Maritime Board. United States Navigation Co. v. … American Union Transport, Inc. v. River Plate & Brazil Conferences, supra.