Case law

Di Salvo Bros. v. Ybarra Y Compania

5 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 21, 1933

C.) 89 F. 374 ; Brown v. Standard, etc., Co., 159 C. C. A. 397 , 247 F. 303 .” … Co. v.

Hudson & Manhattan R. v. Hardy

22 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 4, 1938

V. … Crowell v.

Seligson v. New York Produce Exchange

394 F. Supp. 125 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 1975

The court therefore concluded that “liability if it exists must be premised on the principle enunciated in Board of Trade [of City of Chicago] v. … In Board of Trade v.

Van Pelt v. The Alaska

27 F. 704 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 17, 1886

Brown, J. At a little past 12 o’clock on the night of December 2, 1883, when the steam-ship Alaska, bound for New York, was about 12 miles S. ¡3. … In the case of McLaren v. Compagnie Francaise, 9 App.

Persaud

District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 3, 2026

AUTHORIZATION BROWN, and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. … Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

Bernstein v. Herren

141 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 8, 1956

In a somewhat similar suit, Judge Sugarman, Bernstein v. … Gentila v. Pace, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 75 , 193 F.2d 924 ; Davis v. Woodring, 72 App.D.C. 83 , 111 F.2d 523 ; Marshall v. Wyman, D.C., 132 F.Supp. 169 .

New York Department of Social Services v. Shalala

876 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 6, 1994

Quinlan, 838 F.2d 41, 43 (2d Cir.1988), quoting Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 381 , 89 S.Ct. 1794, 1802 , 23 L.Ed.2d 371 (1969). 2. … In light of the SSA audits and the State’s failure to produce evidence in rebuttal, the Board’s decision to affirm the disallowances was reasonable. See Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v.

Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Hesse

962 F. Supp. 2d 576 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 26, 2013

See Fink v. … Since a Caremark claim implicates board inaction, demand futility is assessed under the Rales test. Ferre v. McGrath, 2007 WL 1180650 , at *3.

Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.

890 F. Supp. 269 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1995

See Maywalt v. … See Hagerman v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kallir, Philips, Ross, Inc.

420 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1976

Mastro Plastics Corp., 354 F.2d 170 , 178-79 (2d Cir. 1965); NLRB v. Brown & Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (8th Cir. 1963). 13 . EEOC v. Steamfitters Local 638, supra n. 7, 542 F.2d at 579-592; Satty v. … See Sparks v. Griffin, 460 F.2d 433, 443 (5th Cir. 1972); Hegler v. Board of Educ., 447 F.2d 1078, 1081 (8th Cir. 1971); cf. Inda v.

Udoh

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 13, 2026

Udoh, proceeding pro se, filed this action against the New York City Department of Probation (“DOP”), Natasha Segers, Maryann Brown, and Lisa Ambrosio! … Jackson v. N.Y.S. Department of Labor, 709 F. Supp. 2d 218, 224 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing McEachin v. McGuinnis, 357 F.3d 197, 200 (2d Cir. 2004)).

Royster v. McGinnis

332 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 23, 1971

Perez v. … Royster v.

Tamplenizza v. Josephthal & Co., Inc.

32 F. Supp. 2d 702 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 27, 1999

(quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Comm. v. DASA Corp., 524 F.2d 811, 817 (2d Cir.1975)). … Wilton v.

United States v. Wood

270 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 2, 1967

One Brown reported purchasing stolen drivers’ licenses and other items from Kuhle. These items were found in Brown’s possession. On the basis of these allegations, a search of Kuhle’s home was authorized. … The Court of Appeals stated, “The identity of the licenses found on Brown with those known by * * * [the affiant] to have been stolen was a far stronger reason for believing Brown’s story than a record of an informer’s previous

Phoenix Four, Inc. v. Strategic Resources Corp.

446 F. Supp. 2d 205 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 1, 2006

In April 2004, after Schack and Van Pelt resigned from the Phoenix Board, a new Board was installed. Id. ¶ 8 . The members of the new Board were Percy R. … Conversely, in Leve v.

Horan v. Hughes

129 F. 248 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 15, 1903

De Remer v. Brown, 165 N. Y. 419 , 59 N. E. 129 ; Tew v. Wolfsohn (Court of Appeals) 66 N. E. 934 .

Burton v. Exxon Corp.

583 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 18, 1984

EVALUATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ ACTIONS I. The Governing Law In this diversity action, the Court is required to follow New York’s choice of law rules. Klaxon Co. v. … As part of this fiduciary duty, Exxon and Eurogasco’s Board of Directors were required to be fair in their dealings insofar as those dealings affected the interests of the minority' stockholders. Getty Oil Co. v.

Villani v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 1185 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 3, 1972

In Silver v. … In Silver v.

Leigh v. Gerber

86 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1949

Since one who innocently copies from an infringing copy is liable as an infringer to the owner whose unpublished work was infringed, Acosta v. Brown, D.C. S.D.N.Y. 1943, 50 F.Supp. 615 , affirmed De Acosta v. … Champney v. Haag, C.C.E.D. Pa. 1903, 121 F. 944 . Compare dissenting opinion in De Acosta v. Brown, supra, 146 F.2d at page 413 .

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United Railroad Workers Division of Transport Workers Union of America

176 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 19, 1959

If such efforts to resolve a minor dispute fail the Mediation Board may remit the parties to the appropriate Adjustment Board for determination. See Brotherhood of R. R. Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana R. R. … Co. v. Burley, supra.