Case law

Carbola Chemical Co. v. Trundle

3 F.R.D. 502 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 1943

A reading of the Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in the Brown v. Cranston case discloses how reluctantly the Court reached that conclusion. … I am therefore of the opinion that the case of Brown v. Cranston, supra, is not controlling.

Complaint of American Export Lines, Inc.

73 F.R.D. 454 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 25, 1977

Although at common law the findings of a Marine Board of Investigation were not admitted in civil actions, The Charles Morgan, 115 U.S. 69 , 5 S.Ct. 1172 , 29 L.Ed. 316 (1885); Steward v. … S. v. Harrill, 26 F.Cas. 169, 170 (N.D.Cal.1857). .

Hammond v. Marmon Automobile Co.

300 F. 803 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 9, 1924

Grinnell Washing Machine Co. v. Johnson, 247 U. S. 426 , 38 Sup. Ct. 547, 62 L. Ed. 1196 . … Hammond v. Benzer Corp. (D. C.) 295 Fed. 908 , at page 912. Even if the plaintiff’s patent were valid, it is not infringed by the defendant’s instrument hoard.

PepsiCo, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.

114 F. Supp. 2d 243 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 19, 2000

The factors enumerated in Brown Shoe Co. v. … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 326 , 82 S.Ct. at 1524 (men’s, women’s and children’s shoes were separate product lines recognized by public); General Foods Corp. v.

Lutwin v. City of New York

106 F.R.D. 502 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 26, 1985

Plaintiff pro se seeks compensatory and punitive damages for injuries allegedly suffered from her termination from the position of District Manager of Community Board Number 9 in New York City. … Traguth v. Zuck, 710 F.2d 90, 94 (2d Cir. 1983) (citations omitted).

United States v. Holby

345 F. Supp. 639 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 29, 1972

This contention is without merit, however, since proceedings before the local board are administrative and in no way adversary or criminal in nature. United States v. … McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 , 89 S.Ct. 1657 , 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1965). 11 . See also United States v. Quattrucci, 454 F.2d 58 (1st Oir. 3972) ; United States v.

Hunt v. United States

17 F. Supp. 578 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1936

Gonzales v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. (D.C.) 3 F.(2d) 168 . … Adams et al. v. United States (D.C.) 281 F. 895 .

United States v. Jackson

768 F. Supp. 97 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 12, 1991

The Van Hawkins definition was also adopted by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in United States v. Brown, 859 F.2d 974 (D.C.Cir.1988). … See also United States v.

Bronx Household of Faith v. BD. OF EDUC. NEW YORK

400 F. Supp. 2d 581 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 2005

McCreary County, Ky. v. … See Zelman v.

S&R DEVELOPMENT ESTATES, LLC v. Bass

588 F. Supp. 2d 452 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 26, 2008

V. … , because it was unclear whether the Board would deny approval for all uses that would enable the plaintiffs to derive economic benefit from the property); Marathon Outdoor, LLC v.

Willcox v. Harriman Securities Corporation

10 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 8, 1933

Hallows v. Fernie, 3 Ch. App. 467, 471; Clarkson v. Davies, [1923] App. Cas. 100, 112; Churchill v. Whetnall, L. J. R. 1913, 87 Ch. Div. 524; Associated Almond Growers v. Wymond (C. C. A.) 42 F.(2d) 1 ; Brown v. … Hodge v. United States Steel Corporation, 64 N. J. Eq. 90, 53 A. 601 ; Aalwyn’s Law Institute v. Martin, 173 Cal. 21 , 159 P. 158 ; Brown v. Duluth R. Co. (C. C.) 53 F. 889 .

O'Keefe v. Boeing Co.

38 F.R.D. 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 8, 1965

Securities and Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co., 310 U.S. 434, 460 , 60 S.Ct. 1044 , 84 L.Ed. 1293 (1940). … The Reports of the Boards of Officers will be called “Board Reports”; the papers sought include copies of parts of Board Reports.

New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Ebbers

382 F. Supp. 2d 549 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 2005

Brown, Inc. (n/k/a/ Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.), 8 and Lehman Brothers, Inc. (“Underwriter Defendants”). 9 Other investment banks that are *554 listed as defendants are separately represented. … Novak v. Kasaks, 216 F.3d 300, 311 (2d Cir.2000).

Oei v. Citibank, N.A.

957 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1997

See Brown v. Lockwood, 76 A.D.2d 721, 742-43 , 432 N.Y.S.2d 186, 201 (2d Dep’t 1980); Krofft Entertainment, Inc. v. CBS Songs, 653 F.Supp. 1530, 1534 (S.D.N.Y.1987). … James Brown”, but the letter of credit was in favor of “Arthur James Brown”; 2) the shipping documents identified the goods as “unground casein,” not “casein” as required by the letter of credit; 3) the beneficiary failed

Application of Martini

184 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 31, 1960

As was pointed out in Shomberg v. … In Mitchell v.

Canty v. Day

13 F. Supp. 3d 333 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 9, 2014

See Scalisi v. … Desimone v. Barrows, 924 A.2d 908, 943 (Del.Ch.2007); see Blaustein v.

Fogg v. Randolph

244 F. Supp. 885 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 13, 1962

It is clear that certification of a bargaining representative by the Board is not subject to judicial review even in a suit to which the Board is a party. Switchmen’s Union of North America v. … United Transport Service Employees of America v. National Mediation Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 15 , 141 F.2d 724 . Nor can decertification be obtained indirectly in a suit to which the Board is not a party.

Scottish Air International, Inc. v. British Caledonian Group, PLC

751 F. Supp. 1129 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 4, 1990

However, in Foman v. … See Borden, Inc. v.

Weber v. Bartle

272 F. Supp. 201 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 20, 1967

Defendants place much emphasis on O’Neill v. … Furthermore, in Ruckle v.

United States v. Ramos

282 F. Supp. 354 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 29, 1968

Ramos came out of the apartment with a brown paper bag, drove to 202 West 82nd Street and went into the building with a package. … Gonzales v. United States, 301 F.2d 31 (9th Cir. 1962); Guevara v. United States, 242 F.2d 745 (5th Cir. 1957); compare United States v. Berry, 362 F.2d 756 (2d Cir. 1966); Travis v.