Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

0.90s

  • Huertas v. East River Housing Corp.

    674 F. Supp. 440 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1987

    Town of Clarkton, 682 F.2d 1055, 1065 (4th Cir.1982); Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., 610 F.2d 1032, 1036-37 (2d Cir.1979); Resident Advisory Board v. … Columbus Board of Education v. Penick, 443 U.S. 449, 465 , 99 S.Ct. 2941, 2950 , 61 L.Ed.2d 666 (1979) (quotation, omitted).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Alzamora v. Village of Chester

    534 F. Supp. 2d 436 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 8, 2008

    Recons, at 3, citing Harris v. County of Riverside, 904 F.2d 497, 503 (9th Cir.1990), Seawall Assocs. v. … French Investing Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Washpon v. Parr

    561 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 2008

    Rattner v. Netburn, 930 F.2d 204, 208 (2d Cir.1991) (citing Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, 834 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir.1987); Posr v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Lennon v. Richardson

    378 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 1, 1974

    Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 1 U.S. 415 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Sears Roebuck & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 153 U.S.App.D.C. 380 , 473 F.2d 91 (1973). … If the Board should fail to permit plaintiff to reopen and in doing so commits an abuse of discretion, judicial review is available in the Court of Appeals. Schieber v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ortiz

    District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 2026

    P. 72(b)(3); see also United States v. Male Juvenile, 121 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 1997). … Miller v. Brightstar Asia, Ltd., 43 F.4th 112, 120 (2d Cir. 2022).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • New York City Coalition for Community Health v. Lindsay

    362 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 1973

    Under the teaching of Rosado v. Wyman, supra, the circumstance that HEW is concerned with the creation of District Boards does not limit the judicial remedy of the plaintiffs. … Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 98-99 , 88 S.Ct. 1942 , 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1963). 6 The Supreme Court in Barlow v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. Mediobanca Banca di Credito Finanziario-Societa Per Azioni

    69 F.R.D. 592 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 23, 1974

    Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. … [A]n individual stockholder has no more right to challenge by a derivative suit a decision by the board of directors not to sue than to so challenge any other decision by the board.” Swanson v. Traer, supra at 859.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.

    868 F. Supp. 2d 207 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 18, 2012

    I further find that a brown/ red/brown stripe is visually dissimilar from the GRG Stripe and will not cause confusion, even in the post-sale context. … See Louis Vuitton S.A. v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • United States v. Paramount Famous Lasky Corporation

    34 F.2d 984 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1929

    This suit, although tried separately, is a companion ease to United States of America v. First National Pictures, Inc., et al. (E. 45-99 D. … The decision in United States v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brautigam v. Rubin

    55 F. Supp. 3d 499 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 2014

    See Rahbari v. Oros, 732 F.Supp.2d 367, 376 (S.D.N.Y.2010). A court must assess demand futility with respect to the board of directors as of the time the plaintiff filed its complaint. Braddock v. … Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 814 (Del.1984); Seminaris v. Landa, 662 A.2d 1350, 1354 (Del.Ch.1995). Where a plaintiff bases his complaint on board inaction, the analysis focuses on the first prong of Aronson.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • National Credit Union Administration Board v. HSBC Bank US, National Association

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 2020

    Sys. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Osborne v. Miller

    557 F. Supp. 2d 435 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 30, 2008

    Ortiz v. … See, e.g., Mysholowsky v. People, 535 F.2d 194 (2d Cir.1976) (witnesses viewed robber for forty-five seconds); Brown v. Tracy, 299 F.Supp.2d 77, 80 (E.D.N.Y.2004) (witness viewed robber for fifteen seconds).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Al Turi Landfill, Inc. v. Town of Goshen

    556 F. Supp. 231 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 1, 1982

    In Head v. … In Lewis v. B.T.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Gronlund v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

    514 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 29, 1981

    In Fuller Co. v. Brown, 15 F.2d 672 (4th Cir. 1926) (“Fuller”), the plaintiff received six separate and distinct partial payments of a bonus. Defendant reneged on the balance thereof (along with other bonus payments). … The action of the Board was to be final and conclusive ... no showing that the decision of the Board was unreasonable, arbitrary, unfair or capricious ....

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Butz

    517 F. Supp. 1167 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 9, 1981

    (Tr. 755-56). 2 He had both white and brown heroin for sale. (Tr. 728-29). Butz was the source of all the quaaludes which was the basis of the charges in the substantive counts. … See United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shapiro v. Berger

    328 F. Supp. 2d 496 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 5, 2004

    Board of Ed. of Kent County, 387 U.S. 105, 108 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967) (permitting appointment of school board members); Rodriguez v. … In Davis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thorgeirsson v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    288 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 30, 1968

    Moreover, the Railway Labor Act requires the District Court to accept the System Adjustment Board’s determination of the merits of a grievance. Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern R. … V V b* V (p) If a carrier does not comply with an order of a division of the Adjustment Board within the time limit in such order, the petitioner, or any person for whose benefit such order was made, may file in the District

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jewish Consumptives Relief Soc. v. Rothfeld

    9 F.R.D. 64 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 1, 1949

    Lewis here in New York and to produce the minutes of meetings of the Board of Trustees for the calendar years 1947 and 1948 is denied. Sullivan v. Southern Pacific Company, D. … Bothwell, D.C., 8 F.R.D. 45 and cases therein cited; Varanelli v. Wood et al., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1949, 9 F.R.D. 61 , opinion of Goddard, J.; see also Horst v. Traudt, 43 Colo. 445 , 96 P. 259 ; Knauss v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Armco Steel Corporation v. Stans

    303 F. Supp. 262 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 19, 1969

    Laird (D.C.Cir., April 3, 1969); Arnold Tours, Inc. v. Camp, 408 F.2d 1147 (1st Cir. 1969); Wingate Corporation v. … In Norwalk CORE v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Avaras v. Board of Education of The Clarkstown Central School District

    District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 2019

    See Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989); Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60-62 (2d Cir. 1986). Of these, the merits are “[t]he factor which command|[s] the most attention.” … Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District 62 Old Middletown Rd. New City, NY 10956 2.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.