Case law

Behrens v. The Furnessia

35 F. 798 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 1, 1888

Brown, J. The libelant, a young man 24 years of age, in September, 1.885, took passage on the steam-ship Furnessia from Glasgow to New York. … The wages of an able hand at Nicollet, he testified, are about $208 a year, besides board. In the case of The Juniata, 93 U. S. 337 ; The City of Panama, 101 U.

Genesco, Inc. v. JOINT COUNCIL 13, UNITED SHOE WKRS. OF AMER.

230 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 8, 1964

See, Carrier Corp. v. N. L. R. *931 B. 311 F.2d 135, 138 (2d Cir. 1962) reversed sub nom. United Steelworkers of America, A.F.L.-C.I.O. v. N. L. R. B., 84 S.Ct. 899 (March 23, 1964); N. L. R. B. v. Local 294, I. B. … Jody Fair, Inc. v. Dubinsky, 225 F.Supp. 695 (S.D.N.Y.1964); Ingino v. Certified Preferred, Inc. and Local 282, 222 F.Supp. 109 (E.D.N.Y. 1963).

Ortiz

District Court, S.D. New York · May 19, 2026

P. 72(b)(3); see also United States v. Male Juvenile, 121 F.3d 34, 38 (2d Cir. 1997). … Miller v. Brightstar Asia, Ltd., 43 F.4th 112, 120 (2d Cir. 2022).

United States v. Gearey

266 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 17, 1967

United States v. Gearey, 2 Cir., 368 F.2d 144 (2d Cir. 1966). That court was disturbed over the form of the Local Board’s finding that Gearey was not “a genuine c. o.” … Witmer v. United States, 348 U.S. 375, 380-381 , 75 S.Ct. 392, 395 , 99 L.Ed. 428 (1955).

McLeod v. AMERICAN FED. OF TELEVISION & RADIO ARTISTS, NY LOC.

234 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 5, 1964

McLEOD, Regional Director of the Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Cf., Local 1545, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of American, AFL-CIO v. Vincent, 187 F.Supp. 921 (S.D.N.Y.) aff'd, 286 F.2d 127 (2d Cir. 1960). The Board cites Kentile, Inc. v.

International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local No. 5 v. Hudson Valley District Council Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Joint Benefit Funds

162 F.R.D. 17 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 14, 1995

See Evans v. … See Sanders v.

Stein v. Bailey

531 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 4, 1982

See Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado, supra. … In Abramowitz v.

In Re Contents in Citibank Account No. Held by Rouz USA, Inc.

759 F. Supp. 2d 281 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 2010

TRW Inc. v. … See Griffin v.

Washpon v. Parr

561 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 2008

Rattner v. Netburn, 930 F.2d 204, 208 (2d Cir.1991) (citing Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, 834 F.2d 54, 58 (2d Cir.1987); Posr v. … In Brown v.

Reardon v. Arkell

59 F. 624 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 7, 1894

v. … Under the construction given to some sections of the pilotage laws of Yew York by the court of appeals in Brown v.

United States v. Gearey

260 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 1966

Berman v. … Those courts which think not, have upheld determinations not to reopen by local boards. United States v. Porter, 314 F.2d 833, 836 (7th Cir. 1963); Boyd v.

Lennon v. Richardson

378 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 1, 1974

Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 1 U.S. 415 , 94 S.Ct. 1028 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Sears Roebuck & Co. v. N.L.R.B., 153 U.S.App.D.C. 380 , 473 F.2d 91 (1973). … If the Board should fail to permit plaintiff to reopen and in doing so commits an abuse of discretion, judicial review is available in the Court of Appeals. Schieber v.

New York City Coalition for Community Health v. Lindsay

362 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 1973

Under the teaching of Rosado v. Wyman, supra, the circumstance that HEW is concerned with the creation of District Boards does not limit the judicial remedy of the plaintiffs. … Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83, 98-99 , 88 S.Ct. 1942 , 20 L.Ed.2d 947 (1963). 6 The Supreme Court in Barlow v.

United States v. Montes-Reyes

547 F. Supp. 2d 281 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 14, 2008

Brown, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 ; see also United States v. Pena, 961 F.2d 333, 338 (2d Cir.1992). … In Brown v.

Golar v. Daniels & Bell, Inc.

533 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 19, 1982

Russell v. … Generally, it has been held that any challenges to the misuse of authority by a bank’s board under Section 24 may be made only by the Comptroller of the Currency. See Thompson v.

Manhattan Cable Television, Inc. v. Cable Doctor, Inc.

824 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 23, 1993

See Pierce v. … Cable Doctor’s reliance on Key Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, 745 F.Supp. 749 (D.D.C.1990), and Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v.

United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

30 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1940

Congress has created this Board for such very purpose and has vested in them such power exclusively. In Blankenship v. … American Federation of Labor et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed.-; National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Co., 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. -; and National Labor Relations Board v.

The Bouker No. 2

231 F. 254 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 15, 1916

Judge Addison Brown, likewise a high authority in such cases, ruled the same way (The W. L. White [D. C.] 25 Fed. 503 ), and this has been followed in Wilson v. Manhattan Canning Co. (D. … C.) 198 Fed. 587 , obiter, seems to have approved the rule, as did also Judge Hoffman in Raymond v. The Ella S. Thayer (D. C.) 40 Fed. 902 . Judge Henry B. Brown’s decision in The J. F. Card (D.

Burkle v. OTK Associates, LLC

2 F. Supp. 3d 519 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 25, 2014

In TSC Indus., Inc. v. … In Ashcroft v.

In re Boesky Securities Litigation

155 F.R.D. 71 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 22, 1994

The rule of law applicable here with respect to the amendment of the complaint is stated in Flickinger v. Harold C. … Newman v. Silver, 713 F.2d 14, 15, n. 1 (2d Cir.1983); Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(a); see also Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co., 148 F.2d 974, 976 (2d Cir.1945) (Clark, J.)