Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.74s
Douds v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union Local 584
154 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 13, 1957
On the contrary, Chief Judge Clark in National Labor Relations Board v. … In two recent cases, National Labor Relations Board v. Local 11, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, etc., 6 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 932 , and National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCohen v. Industrial Finance Corporation
44 F. Supp. 491 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1942
Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna R. R. Co., 213 U.S. 435 , 29 S.Ct. 540, 543 , 53 L.Ed. 862 . … Dana v. Morgan, D.C., 219 F. 313, 315 ; Ogden et al. v. Gilt Edge Consol. Mines Co. et al., 8 Cir., 225 F. 723 .
Cited 22 timesPublished29 F. Supp. 970 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 8, 1939
Utz & Dunn Co. v. Regulator Co., 8 Cir., 213 F. 315 ; Owens v. Dancy, 10 Cir., 36 F.2d 882 ; In re Fox West Coast Theatres, D.C., 25 F.Supp. 250 , affirmed 9 Cir., 88 F.2d 212 . … Brown stated: “We will make no objection even if you do own stock in any of the companies.”
Cited 1 timesPublished525 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 4, 1981
See United States v. Frasquillo-Zomosa, 626 F.2d 99, 101 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 987 , 101 S.Ct. 405 , 66 L.Ed.2d 249 (1980); United States v. Hill, 538 F.2d 1072, 1074 (4th Cir. 1976); S. Rep. … See United States v. E. K., 471 F.Supp. 924, 936 (D.Ore.1979).
Cited 20 timesPublishedNew York SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Clarkstown
99 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 26, 2000
Co. v. … See also Notale v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States Lace Curtain Mills v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.
145 F. 701 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1906
The action relates to one of these cases, which the libellant contends was broken on board the vessel and the contents, long bars used in curtain machines, so injured that it was necessary to semi them hack to England for … A clause differently worded, but construed as if worded in the same way, was enforced by Brown, J., and by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Calderon v. Atlas S. S. Co. (D. C.) 64 Fed. 874 , and 60 Fed. 574 , 16 C. C.
Cited 5 timesPublishedNational Credit Union Administration Board v. HSBC Bank US, National Association
District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 6, 2020
BlackRock v. Wells Fargo, 247 F.Supp.3d 377, 389 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), objections overruled WL 36 10511 (S.D.N-Y. Aug. 21, 2017). … BlackRock v. Deutsche Bank, 14-cv-09367 (JMF)(SN), ECF. No. 286, Jun. 20, 2017 Order at 4— 5.
Cited 0 timesUnknown22 F. Supp. 3d 256 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 22, 2014
Getso v. Harvard University Extension School, 2011 WL 135012 , at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2011) citing Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 84 (1st Cir.1998). … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Cited 48 timesPublishedA. Seltzer & Co. v. Livingston
253 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 18, 1966
Ass’n v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers etc., Local Union, 362 U.S. 274 , 80 S.Ct. 706 , 4 L.Ed.2d 710 (1960); Line Drivers Local No. 961, etc. v. W. J.
Cited 17 timesPublished281 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 29, 1968
(Emphasis supplied). 1 A similar provision relating to the powers of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (d) (2) (A), was involved in Murphy v. … The provision for cease and desist orders for violations of the Board’s regulations was enacted in 1966 and there is nothing in it which would exclude regulations of the Board pursuant to § 78i(i), cf. Reich v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUsery v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots
422 F. Supp. 1221 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1976
In Wirtz v. … In Hodgson v.
Modified on other grounds by W. J. Usery v. International Organization Of Masters, Mates And Pilots, 538 F.2d 946 (1976)Cited 8 timesPublishedThe Tribeca Condominium v. Realty Advisory Board on Labor Relations, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 29, 2021
Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 104 (2d Cir. 2006) (alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted). … Citigroup, Inc. v. Abu Dhabi Inv. Auth., 776 F.3d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also 9 U.S.C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSimon & Schuster v. NY State Crime Victims Bd.
724 F. Supp. 170 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 26, 1989
724 F.Supp. 170 (1989) SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., Plaintiff, v. MEMBERS OF the NEW YORK STATE CRIME VICTIMS BOARD, Gennaro Fischetti, George L. … Plaintiff relies heavily on Board of Airport Commissioners of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (1987).
Cited 3 timesPublishedOFFICIAL COMMITTEE, UNSECURED CREDITORS OF COLOR TILE v. Investcorp
137 F. Supp. 2d 502 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 2001
See, e.g., Bethscheider Tr., 34-35; Kinler Tr., 25-26; Brown Tr., 191-93. Similarly, an unsuccessful ABF acquisition would have injured all shareholders. … Cinerama, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUniversal Film Exchanges, Inc. v. Walter Reade, Inc.
37 F.R.D. 4 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 18, 1965
Brown in Inglett & Company, Inc. v. … As Judge Brown pointedly said: “ * * * if the ‘facts’ are really facts, they should be put forward as such without interstitial argumentation.” Id. at 349 . See also Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. Franklin Life Ins.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIn Re Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company
172 F. Supp. 329 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 14, 1959
The United States Supreme Court has held in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana R. … Respondents rely upon the case of Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, Peoria & Western R. R., 1944, 321 U.S. 50 , 64 S.Ct. 413 , 88 L.Ed. 534 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedDeClara v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
748 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 29, 1990
Subject Matter Jurisdiction Generally, federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the findings of an Adjustment Board. See Andrews v. … See e.g., Edelman v. Western Airlines, Inc., 892 F.2d 839, 846 (9th Cir.1989); Hayes v. Western Weighing & Inspection Bureau, 838 F.2d 1434, 1436 (5th Cir.1988); Steffens v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedPenn Mart Realty Company v. Becker
300 F. Supp. 731 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 9, 1969
The Schoenbaum Decision IDS claims that dismissal of this federal claim is required by a recent decision of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Schoenbaum v. … See, e. g., Continental Bank and Trust Co. of Salt Lake City v. Garfinkle, 292 F.Supp. 709 (S.D.N.Y.1968). 9 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedGonzalez v. Scalinatella, Inc.
112 F. Supp. 3d 5 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 12, 2015
Having examined the remainder of the time-sheets, we determine that, while an across-the-board, 10% reduction in hours is appropriate for Mr. … This accounts for both the Striking of hours associated with the motion for class-certification and the subsequent, 10% across-the-board trimming. .
Cited 68 timesPublished320 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 19, 1970
General Host Corp., 296 F.Supp. 470 (S.D.N.Y.1969); see also Sherman v. Posner, 266 F.Supp. 871, 874 (S.D.N.Y.1966) ; Kauder v. United Board & Carton Corp., 199 F.Supp. 420, 423-424 (S.D.N.Y.1961) ; Mack v. … American Export Lines, 175 F.Supp. 386 (S.D.N.Y.1959) ; Eastman Kodak Co. v. McAuley, 41 F.Supp. 873 (S.D.N.Y.1942). 10 . Kauder v. United Board & Carton Corp., 199 F.Supp. 420, 423 (S.D.N.Y.1961) ; Mack v.
Disagreed with by Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,428, 458 F.2d 255 (1972)Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna