Case law

In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities Litigation

605 F. Supp. 2d 570 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009

See United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local v. Brown Group, 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … In Perry v.

Courtemanche v. Enlarged City School District

686 F. Supp. 1025 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 5, 1988

Stein v. Board of Educ., 792 F.2d 13, 17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 572 , 93 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986). Accord S & D Maint. Co. v. Goldin, 844 F.2d 962 , 967 (2d Cir.1988). … V.

In re Mandel

44 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1942

See Weinberg v. United States of America, 2 Cir.,-F.2d —, decided March 11, 1942. … Weinberg v. United States, supra.

United States ex rel. Partheniades v. Shaughnessy

146 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 5, 1956

See Arakas v. Zimmerman, 3 Cir., 1952, 200 F.2d 322 ; cf. United States ex rel. Adel v. Shaughnessy, 2 Cir., 1950, 183 P. 2d 371 ; United States ex rel. James v. … This lends further credence to the view that the Board itself believed the 1952 Act to be applicable even as to their decision of March 4, 1954. . In United States ex rel. Hintopoulos v.

Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.

501 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1981

See Williams v. McAllister Brothers Inc., supra, 534 F.2d at 21 . The Fidenas plaintiffs also assert that “officers of defendants served on the board of directors of CHB.” See note 7 supra. … Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir. 1977). An action’s lack of merit has been found insufficient in itself to constitute “bad faith.” Miracle Mile Associates v.

CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. Goldfeld

739 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 1990

Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Zirin Reply Aff., Exh. 4). The language in Brown applies here as well. … Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196, 1202 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Zirin Aff., Exh. 4 at 314).

Schachter v. Whalen

445 F. Supp. 1376 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 7, 1978

In Sreter v. … is quite unlike that of the Alabama Board of Optometry, which was found to be biased against those charged in disciplinary proceedings in Gibson v.

Sansevera v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.

859 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 4, 1994

See Heidgerd v. … Pompano v.

COMMITTEE FOR PUBLIC ED. & RELIG. LIB. v. Rockefeller

322 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 28, 1971

Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947); Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 , 83 S.Ct. 1560 , 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963); Board of Education v. … This formulation was repeated in haec verba in Board of Education v.

Tyrill v. Alcoa Steamship Company

185 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 1960

Downie v. Powers, 10 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 760, 767 . 4 . E. g., Luther v. Maple, 8 Cir., 1958, 250 F.2d 916, 920 ; Hardigg v. Inglett, 4 Cir., 1957, 250 F.2d 895 ; Gwinett v. Albatross S.S. … Gwinett v. Albatross S.S. Co., supra, note 4, at page 10 of 243 F.2d. 6 . Tennant v. Peoria & P. U. Ry., 1944, 321 U.S. 29, 35 , 64 S.Ct. 409 , 88 L.Ed. 520 . Cf. Schulz v. Pennsylvania R.

United States v. Intersimone

512 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 1981

United States v. Wright, supra, at 1101. The trial of United States v. … Thus, Brown testified at trial about the Fiumara transaction, and Fiumara confirmed Brown’s story in his testimony. At most, the $20,000 check was corroborative or cumulative.

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Syron

934 F. Supp. 2d 609 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2013

Smith v. … The same is true of Brown v. E.F. Hutton Grp., Inc., a case the Second Circuit relied upon in *629 Dodds. Id. (citing Brown, 991 F.2d 1020, 1031 (2d Cir.1993)).

Norbay Music, Inc. v. King Records, Inc.

249 F. Supp. 285 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 11, 1966

England v. Louisiana State Board, 375 U.S. 411, 422 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964). … Brown in The Operation of the Damage Provisions of the Copyright Law: An Exploratory Study, Subcomm. on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Senate Comm, on the Judiciary, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 59, 85 (Copyright Law

United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

761 F. Supp. 315 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 18, 1991

H: Declaration dated October 17, 1989, of Clyde V. Summers offered as expert testimony in U.S. v. IBT 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE) (1988). … Arrest Record of Jack Brown Yager provided by United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Identification Division, Washington, D.C. 20537. 44. U.S.

Lifschultz v. United States

144 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 21, 1956

In the 1946 proceeding, Brown F. F. … Universal Camera Corp. v.

Gibson v. Phillips

420 F. Supp. 2d 327 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 14, 2006

At trial, petitioner moved to admit Moore’s confession and other evidence that Moore and Brown committed the crime. He argued that Chambers v. … According to petitioner, evidence of Moore’s and Brown’s confessions was exculpatory and therefore the evidence was required to be admitted under Chambers v.

National Credit Union Administration Board v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 13, 2022

See Strauss v. … Amico v.

National Credit Union Administration Board v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York · May 13, 2022

Stein PENG Aran Fl United States District Court, S.D.N.Y. 500 Pearl Street, Room 1010 New York, NY 10007 Re: NCUA Board, et al. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’! … Geller v. Branic Int'l Reality Co., 212 F.3d 734, 738 (2d Cir. 2000).

Williams v. Salerno

622 F. Supp. 1271 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 1985

In Ramey v. … In Pitts v.

August v. Bronstein

369 F. Supp. 190 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 4, 1974

V, § 9). … See Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia, 359 F.Supp. 549, 556 (E.D.Va.1973) (3-Judge Court), aff’d mem., 414 U.S. 1034 , 94 S.Ct. 534 , 38 L.Ed.2d 327 (1973).