Case law

Alcan Aluminium Ltd. v. FRANCHISE TAX, ETC.

539 F. Supp. 512 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 20, 1982

Max Factor & Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 35 Cal. App.3d 7, 9 , 110 Cal.Rptr. 536, 537 (1973). … See, e.g., Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Board, 117 Cal.App.3d 988 , 173 Cal.Rptr. 121 (1981); Anaconda v. Franchise Tax Board of California, 130 Cal.

Wright v. Safir

983 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 10, 1997

Basciano v. Herkimer, 605 F.2d 605, 609 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 929 , 99 S.Ct. 2858 , 61 L.Ed.2d 296 (1979) (citation omitted). In Mathews v. … City of New York, 636 F.Supp. 998 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Laurido v. Simon, 489 F.Supp. 1169, 1177-78 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Snead v.

Hammer v. Town of Greenburgh

440 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 11, 1977

Newman v. Board of Education, 508 F.2d 277, 278 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1447 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); Lombard v. … Plaintiff also cites two decisions, Newman v. Board of Education, 508 F.2d 277 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1447 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); Lombard v.

Smith v. MONTEFIORE MED. CENTER-HEALTH SERVICES

22 F. Supp. 2d 275 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 14, 1998

Monell, 436 U.S. at 692 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ; Board of County Comm'rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 117 S.Ct. at 1388 . Here, plaintiff offers no proof of a policy of failing to warn inmates of asbestos work on the part of the City of New York.

Rolls Tools, Ltd. v. Herman (In Re Herman)

6 B.R. 352 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 6, 1980

[Becher] v. … The final case that must be considered is Brown v. Felsen, supra. In Brown , a state court collection suit was settled by stipulation which provided that a guarantor should have judgment against the debtor.

City of New Rochelle v. Town of Mamaroneck

111 F. Supp. 2d 353 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 24, 2000

Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 476 U.S. 573, 579 , 106 S.Ct. 2080 , 90 L.Ed.2d 552 (1986). … See Rockford Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education, 150 F.3d 686, 688 (7th Cir.1998) (“... a city or other municipality cannot bring suit under” § 1983) (dictum); United States v.

Rodrigues v. Village of Larchmont, New York

608 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 7, 1985

Teleprompter of Erie, Inc. v. City of Erie, 567 F.Supp. 1277, 1293 (W.D.Pa. 1983); see Burt v. … Thus, the Board members are those officers described by Monell v.

Atkinson v. Scully

246 F. 463 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 1917

Williams v. Alaska Commercial Co., 2 Alaska, 43 , affirmed 128 Fed. 362 , 63 C. C. A. 92 ; Appeal of Cahill, 124 Fed. 63 , 59 C. C. A. 519 ; In re Moran (D. C.) 120 Fed. 556 . … His nieces and nephews were Fena Carlson of Obo, Finland, Anna (Siljander) Brown, Albert, Victor, William and Arthur Siljander of Chicago, Ill.

The General Sheridan

10 F. Cas. 182 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1868

In the case of Vandewater v. Mills, 19 How. [60 U. S.] 82, decided by the supreme court at the December term, 1S56, Mr. … This view was applied by this court in July, 1857, in the case of Reed v. The Telos [Case No. 11,653); and in May, 1860, in the case of Torrices v. The Winged Racer [Id. 14,102). It is true that, in Vandewater v.

United States v. Fry

103 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 6, 1952

United States, 1946, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 , and Cox v. United States, 1947, 332 U.S. 442 , 68 S.Ct. 115 , 92 L.Ed. 59 . … Oases very strongly relied upon by the defendant were United States v. Stiles, 3 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 455 and United States v.

Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander

650 F. Supp. 1544 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 13, 1987

Haas & Co. v. … See Rogin v.

Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.

501 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 6, 1981

See Williams v. McAllister Brothers Inc., supra, 534 F.2d at 21 . The Fidenas plaintiffs also assert that “officers of defendants served on the board of directors of CHB.” See note 7 supra. … Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir. 1977). An action’s lack of merit has been found insufficient in itself to constitute “bad faith.” Miracle Mile Associates v.

Abrey v. Reusch

153 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 12, 1957

Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 1938, 302 U.S. 388 , 58 S.Ct. 334 , 82 L.Ed. 319 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … See United States v. Morgan, 1939, 307 U.S. 183, 191 , 59 S.Ct. 795 , 83 L.Ed. 1211 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin, 1937, 301 U.S. 1, 48-49 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 .

In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities Litigation

605 F. Supp. 2d 570 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009

See United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local v. Brown Group, 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … In Perry v.

In re Mandel

44 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 1942

See Weinberg v. United States of America, 2 Cir.,-F.2d —, decided March 11, 1942. … Weinberg v. United States, supra.

CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. Goldfeld

739 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 4, 1990

Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Zirin Reply Aff., Exh. 4). The language in Brown applies here as well. … Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, 735 F.Supp. 1196, 1202 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (Zirin Aff., Exh. 4 at 314).

Schachter v. Whalen

445 F. Supp. 1376 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 7, 1978

In Sreter v. … is quite unlike that of the Alabama Board of Optometry, which was found to be biased against those charged in disciplinary proceedings in Gibson v.

Sansevera v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.

859 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 4, 1994

See Heidgerd v. … Pompano v.

United States v. Intersimone

512 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 1981

United States v. Wright, supra, at 1101. The trial of United States v. … Thus, Brown testified at trial about the Fiumara transaction, and Fiumara confirmed Brown’s story in his testimony. At most, the $20,000 check was corroborative or cumulative.

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Syron

934 F. Supp. 2d 609 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2013

Smith v. … The same is true of Brown v. E.F. Hutton Grp., Inc., a case the Second Circuit relied upon in *629 Dodds. Id. (citing Brown, 991 F.2d 1020, 1031 (2d Cir.1993)).