Case law

Grant v. Morgan Guar. Trust Co. of New York

638 F. Supp. 1528 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 2, 1986

See Brown, supra, 457 F.2d at 1383 . … See United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 714-15 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1481 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983); Knight v. Nassau County Civil Serv.

United States v. Village of Port Chester

704 F. Supp. 2d 411 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 1, 2010

See, e.g., Brown v. Thomson, 462 U.S. 835, 842-43 , 103 S.Ct. 2690 , 77 L.Ed.2d 214 (1983); White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 , 93 S.Ct. 2332 , 37 L.Ed.2d 314 (1973). … Cousin v.

Love v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

529 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 17, 1981

The water has changed “from clear to dark brown.” (Complaint, ¶ 32). … EPA v. California ex rel. State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200, 205 , 96 S.Ct. 2022, 2025 , 48 L.Ed.2d 578 (1976).

Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.

546 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 13, 1982

Windle Co. v. Commissioner, 550 F.2d 43, 45 (1st Cir. 1977); Klemperer v. Price, 271 F.2d 743 , 47 CCPA 729 (1959) (per curiam). … “satisfied”) party may not appeal the Board’s other rulings. Maremont Corp. v. Air Lift Co., supra.

United States v. Erikson

149 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 8, 1957

The Recommendation then cited the case of White v. … Before the Recommendation had been submitted to the Board in this case, the Supreme Court in Sicurella v.

Steed Finance LDC v. Laser Advisers, Inc.

258 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 2003

The Board of Directors for Shetland and Steed were identical. Two of James River’s principals, Paul Saunders and James Brandt, served on the Board of Directors of Shetland and Steed. … Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., 947 F.2d 595, 599 (2d Cir.1991) (citations and internal quotations omitted).

In Re Parmalat Securities Litigation

640 F. Supp. 2d 243 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 25, 2009

Before a GTI board meeting, Kleckner floated a proposal he intended to share with the GTI board to the EP Group. When the EP Group rejected the proposal, Kleckner summarily removed it from the GTI board’s agenda. … See Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1993); In re Rezulin Products Liab. Litig., 210 F.R.D. 61, 69 (S.D.N.Y.2002); In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria on Nov. 11, 2000, 230 F.Supp.2d 392, 399 (S.D.N.Y.2002).

Progress Bulk Carriers v. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n

939 F. Supp. 2d 422 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 2013

(“Board”). … Corp. v. N.Y. City Transit Auth., 14 F.3d 818, 821 (2d Cir.1994)).

Professional Staff Congress/Cuny v. City University

507 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 2, 1981

Board of Educ. v. Middle Island Teachers Ass’n, 50 N.Y.2d 426 , 429 N.Y.S.2d 564, 565 , 407 N.E.2d 411, 412 (1980); Cohoes City Sch. Dist. v. … Board of Educ., 37 N.Y.2d 891, 892 , 378 N.Y.S.2d 371, 371 , 340 N.E.2d 735, 735 (1975). 13 . Board of Curators v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 82 , 98 S.Ct. 948, 951 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); Bishop v.

Hadges v. Corbisiero

760 F. Supp. 388 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 1991

It is clear that while the due process clause requires plaintiff to be afforded a fair and impartial hearing, Withrow v. … Moreover, Wang Yang Sung v. McGrath, 339 U.S. 33 , 70 S.Ct. 445 , 94 L.Ed. 616 (1950), another case plaintiff cites, is unavailing.

In Re First American Center Securities Litigation

807 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 23, 1992

See State Teachers Retirement Board, supra. … Compare Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc., 789 F.Supp. 1092 (D.Colo.1992) and TGX Corp. v. Simmons, 786 F.Supp. 587 (E.D.La.1992) with Brown v.

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.

121 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 30, 1954

Defendant attacks Brown’s tests on several grounds. … Ex parte Fryling, 1947 C.D. 5, 8; 604 O.G. 5 (Board of Appeals) relied upon by defendant, does not indicate to the contrary.

Stoner v. Walsh

772 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 22, 1991

But see Joy v. … Aronoff v.

United States v. Al-Marri

230 F. Supp. 2d 535 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 12, 2002

See United States v. … See Segura v.

Brown

District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 2026

Mandel, 408 U.S. 753, 762 (1972), holding that professors had a First Amendment interest in challenging the visa denial of a person invited to speak at a conference, and Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. … Finally, Ross v. Bank of America, 524 F.3d 217 (2d Cir. 2008), the antitrust case on which Brown and Vincent principally rely, is far afield.

Ex parte Margiasso

242 F. 990 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 15, 1917

Judge Brown, in Re Claiborne (D. C., N. Y.) 5 Am. Bankr. … Taranto v. Erlanger, Sheriff (D. C., N. Y.) 13 Am. Bankr.

United States Ex Rel. Vaccarino v. Officer of Day

305 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 28, 1969

Howze v. United States, 409 F.2d 27 (9th Cir. 1969) ; Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267 (9th Cir. 1969). 4 . United States v. Vincelli, 215 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1954) ; United States v. … United States v. Burlich, supra. 7 . Petrie v. United States, supra. 8 . Lewis v.

Merritt v. The St. Paul

82 F. 104 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 1897

BROWN, District Judge. The above libels were filed to recover compensation for salvage services rendered to the steamship St. … Co. v. New York, H. & R. Min. Co., 20 C. C.

Dusanenko v. Maloney

560 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 1983

As was held in Holroyd v. … See Ness v. Marshall, 660 F.2d 517 (3rd Cir.1981) (permitting dismissals of city solicitor and assistants); Bavoso v. Harding, 507 F.Supp. 313 (S.D.N.Y.1980) (same for city corporation counsel); and Catterson v.

Steinberg v. Mozilo

135 F. Supp. 3d 178 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 29, 2015

Rich v. Chong, 66 A.3d 963, 977 . It is undisputed that the BoA board had taken some action in response to Stein-berg’s demand at the time she filed her complaint. … Accordingly, the Rich v. Chong standard applies, and Stein-berg must particularly plead, reasonable doubts as to the Board’s good faith or due care. E.