Case law

Velazquez v. Fischer

524 F. Supp. 2d 443 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 28, 2007

Detective LiTrenta continued to have Brown review photographs, but Brown maintained that petitioner was the gunman. (Tr. 1221-23,1239-40). D. … Ricky and Phillip Jones, Augustus Brown, and Red Woodford. 2 .

In Re WT Grant Co.

432 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1977

U.S.A. v. Brookhaven, 134 F.2d 442 (C.C.A. 5th 1943); Belt v. Holton, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 197 F.2d 579 (1952); Askins v. Overholser, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 170 F.2d 815 (1948); Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. … In Treasure Imports v.

United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mudd

885 F. Supp. 2d 654 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 10, 2012

The Board, in turn, was controlled by private shareholders — thirteen Board members are elected by voting shareholders and only five are appointed by the President. Id. … See S.E.C v. Brown, 740 F.Supp.2d 148, 164 (D.D.C.2010) (dismissing Section 17(a) claim on this ground).

Guinness v. Miller

291 F. 768 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 23, 1923

However, it was expressly ruled in Brown v. Hiatt, 15 Wall. 177 , 21 L. … An entirely different situation was presented in Robertson v. Miller, 286 Fed. 503 (C. C. A. 2), which apparently recognized the rule in Brown v. Hiatt, supra, though the case was not cited.

Tyco International Ltd. v. Walsh

751 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 20, 2010

Guinness PLC v. Saunders, [1990] 2 A.C. 663, 667. … Ltd. v.

Orange County-Poughkeepsie Ltd. Partnership v. Town of East Fishkill

84 F. Supp. 3d 274 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 30, 2015

P’ship v. … Ltd. v.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638

700 F. Supp. 739 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 23, 1988

Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Board, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Int’l Union, 417 U.S. 249 , 94 S.Ct. 2236 , 41 L.Ed.2d 46 (1974). … Brown v. Wesley’s Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F.2d 952, 956 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, *745 479 U.S. 830 , 107 S.Ct. 116 , 93 L.Ed.2d 63 (1986); C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2614, 810. 2 D.

Earnmoor S. S. Co. v. Union Ins. Co.

44 F. 374 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 28, 1890

Brown, J. … Brown, J.

Vincent v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

215 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 22, 1963

Petitioner is the Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations Board and files this petition for and on behalf of the Board. … Although the brief submitted by the Board indicates that this is a “hot cargo” case, 1 the facts do not bear it out.

The Wm. H. Payne

20 F. 650 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 11, 1884

Brown, J. The libel in this case was filed by the owner of the canal-boat Willis, in tow of the steam-tug Wm. H. … The men on board the latter shouted that she would be into them; she then started up her engines sufficient to prevent a collision with her own tow, and the collision with the Willis happened at about the same moment, while

Singh v. City of New York

418 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 29, 2005

The New York Court of Appeals has emphasized that Brown was a narrow decision. In Martinez v. … See, e.g., Bullard v. State, 307 A.D.2d 676, 678-79 , 763 N.Y.S.2d 371 (3d Dep’t 2003) (rejecting free speech claim under Brown where plaintiff had alternative of an Article 78 proceeding); Hous. Works. Inc. v.

Cooper v. The Saratoga

37 F. 119 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 15, 1888

Brown, J. On the night of August 15,1888, as the libelant’s schooner L. … The lights of the steamer were seen on board the schooner when she was over a mile distant. No flash-light was exhibited from the schooner.

Sostre v. Otis

330 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 1971

Bey v. Connecticut State Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1971). … While it is clear that individuals incarcerated in penal institutions have not forfeited all the rights of free citizens, Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228, 1230 (4th Cir. 1971); Fortune Society v.

United States v. Cotton

346 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 3, 1972

Gearey II, supra, 379 F.2d at 920 ; see United States v. Gearey I, supra. Thus, Cotton’s prima facie post-induction order claim 5 was reviewed preliminarily, Paszel v. Laird, supra, 426 F.2d at 1173 , by his Board. … Yet it is important for courts to know the grounds upon which a board acted, Paszel v.

Durham Industries, Inc. v. North River Insurance

482 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1979

See Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 605 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir. 1978); Grossman v. Axelrod, 466 F.Supp. 770, 778 (S.D.N.Y.1979). … Board of Education v. Farmingdale Teachers Ass’n., Inc., 38 N.Y.2d 397, 403 , 380 N.Y.S.2d 635, 642 , 343 N.E.2d 278, 283 (1975).

Dominguez v. National Airlines, Inc.

279 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 8, 1968

Plaintiff does not seek to review the board's decision. … R. v.

Vanguard Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. v. Cantor, Fitzgerald L.P.

40 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 22, 1999

See, e.g., Board of Managers of Astor Terrace Condominium v. … Brown, 129 A.D.2d 902, 904 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 538, 540 (3d Dep’t 1987) (“Plaintiffs negligence claim is in reality a claim for negligent misrepresentation”); Goshen v. Mutual Life Ins.

Guarnaccia v. Kenin

234 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 3, 1964

See, e. g., Gurton v. Manuti, 235 F.Supp. 50 (S.D.N.Y. May 8, 1964); Rothstein v. Manuti, 235 F.Supp. 48 (April 13, 1964 Per. Levet, J.); Rothstein v. … Gurton v. Manuti, 235 F.Supp. 50 (S.D.N.Y. May 8, 1964). On April 25, 1964, Gurton and Roth-stein appealed to the Board of AFM.

Guffanti v. Hershey

296 F. Supp. 553 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1969

Boyd v. Clark, 287 F.Supp. 561 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d per curiam 393 U.S. 316 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed.2d 511 (January 13, 1969); Wolff v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 372 F.2d 817 (2d Cir. 1967). … Hill v. United States Board of Parole, 257 F.Supp. 129 (M.D.Pa.1966); Smith v. United States Air Force, 280 F.Supp. 478 (E.D.Pa.1968).

Bailey v. Mount Vernon City School District

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 2020

Education (“the Board”) that it pursue charges and seek termination of an employee. … See Matican v.