Case law

The Laurens

14 F. Cas. 1193 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 15, 1849

Equally direct are the cases of Brewster v. Van Ness, 18 Johns. 333 , People v. Brown, 6 Cow. 41 , and People v. Everest, 4 Hill, 71 . … Davidson, 15 Wend. 575 , and in respect to moneys so collected or taken by the deputy, the party entitled to them can have his remedy by process of attachment against the marshal personally, People v. Brown, 6 Cow. 41 .

Wilder v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

175 F. Supp. 3d 82 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2016

Butler v. West, 164 F.3d 634, 638 (D.C.Cir.1999) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1994); see Pryor v. Nat’l Grid, No, 10-cv-6507 (PAC) (THK), 2011 WL 3251571 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.

Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. v. United States

14 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 8, 1936

, and the United States Shipping Board is abolished.” … Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan, 214 U.S. 320 , 29 S.Ct. 671 , 53 L.Ed. 1013 .. And upon the Secretary of the Interior. United States ex rel. Riverside Oil Co. v.

In Re E.F. Hutton Banking Practices Litigation

634 F. Supp. 265 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 2, 1986

Accordingly, allegations of futility require particularized allegations that a majority of the board would be so tainted. See e.g. Bergstein v. … Nonetheless, even if we assume that the board had formally ratified the challenged conduct, as they had in Lewis v.

In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities Litigation

354 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 3, 2005

(“Roberts”), a former chairman of the board of directors of World-Com, Inc. … Emons Indus., Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 749 F.Supp. 1289, 1293 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (citing Gerard v. Almouli, 746 F.2d 936, 939 (2d Cir.1984), and Board of Education v.

Pottstown Fabricators, Inc. v. Manshul Construction Corp.

927 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 20, 1996

Law entitles it to recover the unpaid contract balance because Manshul, the general contractor, has already received payment of the full value of its subcontract with Pottstown from the public owner of the project, the Board

In re United States ex rel. Obum

82 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 6, 1948

to your appeal to such a Board.” … United States v. Day, 2 Cir., 1929, 33 F.2d 267 ; and United States v. Day, D.C. S.D.N.Y.1930, 45 F.2d 435 .

Pepper & Potter, Inc. v. Local 977, United Auto Workers, C.I.O.

103 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1952

The defendants also rely on National Labor Relations Board v. Vulcan Forging Co., 6 Cir., 188 F.2d 927 . … To the extent that it is inconsistent with the rulings in this circuit in National Labor Relations Board v. Century Oxford Mfg. Corporation and National Relations Board v.

In Re WT Grant Co.

432 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 10, 1977

U.S.A. v. Brookhaven, 134 F.2d 442 (C.C.A. 5th 1943); Belt v. Holton, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 148 , 197 F.2d 579 (1952); Askins v. Overholser, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 170 F.2d 815 (1948); Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. … In Treasure Imports v.

Rudin v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.

557 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1983

See, e:g., Gertz v. … See Johnson v.

Sokolowski v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

849 F. Supp. 2d 412 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 2012

Co. v. Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93 , 99 S.Ct. 399 , 58 L.Ed.2d 354 (1978). 1 Judicial review of a decision of an adjustment board is “among the narrowest known to the law.” United Transp. Union v. Nat’l R.R. … Union v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 588 F.3d 805, 810 (2d Cir.2009). The parties do not dispute that the Board at issue in this case is a special adjustment board. .

Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

74 F.R.D. 613 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 1, 1977

McLeod, For and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. Business Machine and Office Appliance Mechanics Conference Board, Local 459 I.U.E.R.M.W., 300 F.2d 237, 239 (2d Cir. 1962); Acme Highway Products Corp. v. D. S. … Brown Co., 473 F.2d 849, 854 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 824 , 94 S.Ct. 125 , 38 L.Ed.2d 57 (1973); DeCosta v.

Velazquez v. Fischer

524 F. Supp. 2d 443 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 28, 2007

Detective LiTrenta continued to have Brown review photographs, but Brown maintained that petitioner was the gunman. (Tr. 1221-23,1239-40). D. … Ricky and Phillip Jones, Augustus Brown, and Red Woodford. 2 .

Guinness v. Miller

291 F. 768 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 23, 1923

However, it was expressly ruled in Brown v. Hiatt, 15 Wall. 177 , 21 L. … An entirely different situation was presented in Robertson v. Miller, 286 Fed. 503 (C. C. A. 2), which apparently recognized the rule in Brown v. Hiatt, supra, though the case was not cited.

Tyco International Ltd. v. Walsh

751 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 20, 2010

Guinness PLC v. Saunders, [1990] 2 A.C. 663, 667. … Ltd. v.

The Lynchburg

15 F. Cas. 1175 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 15, 1861

On the hearing of the cause in court, July 16 and 17, an order was made, by consent of the proctors for the libellants, and upon the motion of the proctor for the claimants, Brown Brothers & Co., that 1,541 bags of coffee … Manro v. Almeida, 10 Wheat. [23 U. S.] 473.

Rock-Hill-Uris, Inc. v. McLeod

236 F. Supp. 395 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 11, 1964

They were, therefore, sometimes viewed as barring noncomplying unions from the ballot in Board-conducted elections. American Communications Ass’n, CIO v. … See Leedom v. International Bhd. of Elec. Wkrs., 107 U.S.App.D.C. 357 , 278 F.2d 237 (1960); Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1949). 17 . See Empresa Hondurena de Vapores, S.A. v.

United States v. Cotton

346 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 3, 1972

Gearey II, supra, 379 F.2d at 920 ; see United States v. Gearey I, supra. Thus, Cotton’s prima facie post-induction order claim 5 was reviewed preliminarily, Paszel v. Laird, supra, 426 F.2d at 1173 , by his Board. … Yet it is important for courts to know the grounds upon which a board acted, Paszel v.

Orange County-Poughkeepsie Ltd. Partnership v. Town of East Fishkill

84 F. Supp. 3d 274 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 30, 2015

P’ship v. … Ltd. v.

Samjens Partners I v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

663 F. Supp. 614 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 22, 1987

TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 439 , 96 S.Ct. 2126, 2128 , 48 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976). … See Zion v. Kurtz, 50 N.Y.2d 92, 100 , 428 N.Y.S.2d 199 , 405 N.E.2d 681 (1980).