Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
District Court, S.D. New York · May 6, 2026
On February 13, 2026, in connection with its motion for summary judgment, plaintiff Board of Education (BOE) submitted the administrative record in the form of Exhibits A-AA to the Soliday Declaration. … See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47-48 (2d Cir. 2019); Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006).
Cited 0 timesUnknownWorthington Pump and MacHinery Corp. v. Douds
97 F. Supp. 656 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 18, 1951
The fact that the Board’s decision was based on surprise grounds, he says, was not want of due process and he cites Market St. R. Co. v. R. R. … Klein v. Herrick, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1941, 41 F.Supp. 417 ; Fitzgerald v. Douds, 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F.2d 714 ; Fay v. Douds, supra.
Cited 24 timesPublished207 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 1962
Williams v. Moran, Proctor, Mueser & Rutledge, 205 F.Supp. 208 (S.D.N.Y.1962); Brown v. AndersonNiehols & Co., 203 F.Supp. 489 (D.Mass. 1962). … Williams v. Moran, Proctor, Mueser & Rutledge, supra; Brown v. Anderson-Nichols & Co., supra. It is generally asserted that under the general maritime law there is no survival of actions. Cortes v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedArmstrong v. LIBERTY MUT. LIFE ASSUR. OF BOSTON
273 F. Supp. 2d 395 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 30, 2003
Brown's Opinions Liberty Life asked Dr. … See Lee v. Burkhart, 991 F.2d 1004, 1009 (2d Cir.1993); see also Crocco v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedNew York Legal Assistance Group v. Board of Immigration Appeals
District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 13, 2019
See Pietrangelo v. U.S, Army, 334 F. … See Nwozuzu v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States ex rel. Hom Yuen Jum v. Dunton
291 F. 905 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 9, 1923
Ed. 114 ; Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U. S. 1 , 24 Sup. Ct. 177, 48 L. Ed. 317 . If so, the action of the Secretary must be equally open to review, when- he reverses the board. … Nowhere in the record does it appear that this was ever submitted to the board. Even if it had been, it could not have been used by the board without being brought to the attention of the relator. Chew Hoy Quong v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWestchester Day School v. Village of Mamaroneck
379 F. Supp. 2d 550 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 27, 2005
See Westchester Day Sch., 386 F.3d at 188-89 (“The court’s assessment of the complete, definitive nature of the Board’s rulings may very well be correct.”). … Dougherty v. Town of N. Hempstead Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 282 F.3d 83 , 91 (2d Cir.2002) (citing Gagliardi v. Vill. of Pawling, 18 F.3d 188 , 194 (2d Cir.1994); Brady v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedNational Congress for Puerto Rican Rights v. City of New York
191 F.R.D. 52 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 14, 1999
McCarthy v. Manson, 714 F.2d 234, 237 (2d Cir.1983). III. Discussion Plaintiffs cite the case of Broum v. … v.
Cited 4 timesPublished41 F. 891 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 28, 1890
Brown , J. On the night of March 30,1889, about six miles south-east of the Highland lights, the libelants’ three-masted schooner L. A. … See Baker v. The City of New York, 1 Cliff. 84 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedHuntington v. Freights of the Vigilancia
63 F. 733 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1894
BROWN, District Judge. … Brown v. Gray, 70 Hun, 261 , 24 N. Y. Supp. 61 .
Cited 3 timesPublished103 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 1952
Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United States, 298 U.S. 38 , 56 S.Ct. 720 , 80 L.Ed. 1033 ; Yamataya v. Fisher, 189 U.S. 86 , 23 S.Ct. 611 , 47 L.Ed. 721 .” Judge St. … The United States Supreme Court in Falbo v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedA.L.M. v. Board of Managers of the Vireum Schoolhouse Condominium
District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 2, 2019
Bickerstaff v. … See Francis v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSegarra v. Federal Reserve Bank
17 F. Supp. 3d 304 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 23, 2014
Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). The former category of agency actions creates new obligations or rights, N.Y.C. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. v. … Similarly, in United States v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Ex Rel. Schmidt v. LaVallee
445 F. Supp. 1156 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 12, 1977
Brown v. LaVallee, 424 F.2d 457, 464 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 942 , 91 S.Ct. 946 , 28 L.Ed.2d 223 (1971). … The respondent has only answered these two issues, and since it appears that the petitioner does not press his parole board complaints, the court will not reach those questions. 3 . See Miranda v.
Cited 3 timesPublished23 F. 156 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 11, 1885
Brown, J. … The Shand, 10 Ben. 294 ; Transportation Co. v. Downer, 11 Wall. 134 ; Clark v. Barmvell, 12 How. 272 ; The Titania, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Saic Inc. Derivative Litigation
948 F. Supp. 2d 366 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 10, 2013
See McCall v. … Fuqi Int’l, Inc. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedIsbrandtsen Co. v. United States
96 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 1951
S. v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 271, 286 ; Associated Industries v. Ickes, 2 Cir., 134 F.2d 694 . 25 .
Cited 19 timesPublishedRosen v. DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 9 OF NEW YORK CITY, ETC.
198 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 8, 1961
See, e. g., Weinstock v. Ledisky, 1950, 197 Misc. 859 , 98 N.Y.S.2d 85 (same Brotherhood); Dakchoylous v. Ernst, supra, 203 Misc. at page 280 . … See, e. g., Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C.A. § 504 ; American Communications Ass’n v. Douds, 1950, 339 U.S. 382 , 70 S.Ct. 674 , 94 L.Ed. 925 ; Weinstock v. Ladisky, supra; Ames v.
Cited 22 timesPublished368 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 8, 1973
The Board of Directors is appointed by the Government: one by the Secretary of the Treasury; one by the Federal Reserve Board; and five by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. 15 U.S.C. § 78ccc(e)(2). … Hutton & Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371 , 377 n. 7 (S.D.Tex.1969). See also General Rules of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Rules 3(a) and 5(f). 5 .
Cited 33 timesPublished168 F. Supp. 3d 597 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 2016
See Sousa v. … Mallon points to an apparent discrepancy between the holdings in Closson v. Board of Selectmen and Stokes v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna