Case law

In re Baxter

12 F. 72 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 8, 1882

Brown, D. J. … New Bedford, etc., v. Fair Haven, etc., 9 Allen, 175 , 180; Ex parte Solomon, 1 Glyn & J. 25; Stewart v. Isidor, 1 N. B. R. 485 ; In re Bloss, 4 N. B.

Melani v. Bd. of Higher Educ. of City of New York

561 F. Supp. 769 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 17, 1983

. § 1983 against the Board of Trustees of the City University of New York (“Board”). 1 The action is based upon alleged sex discrimination in the Board’s employment practices. … See James v. Stockholm Valves, supra, 559 F.2d at 332 ; Mecklenberg v. Montana Board of Regents, supra, 13 Employ.Prac.Dec. at 6496; cf. Presseisen v.

Hall v. The Alene

74 F. 268 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 27, 1896

BROWN, District Judge. The above libel was filed by the owners of the three-masted schooner John W. … The men on board the schooner strenuously deny any change of course, and aver that the steamer, when first seen, was about a point on the schooner’s starboard bow and heading for the schooner’s starboard bow; that she then

O'Hara v. Board of Cooperative Education Services, Southern Westchester

District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 16, 2020

Leeds Brown Law, P.C. … Gorton v. Gettel, 554 F.3d 60, 61 (2d Cir. 2009).2 BOCES, one such board, is based in Rye, New York. (Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”) ¶ 8 (Dkt. No. 31).) All Individual Defendants are officials of BOCES.

United States v. Egan

501 F. Supp. 1252 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 8, 1980

See also United States v. Flores, supra (jurisdiction asserted over murder committed on board United States vessel in territorial waters of Belgian Congo). … United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 554 , 100 S.Ct. 1870, 1877 , 64 L.Ed.2d 497 (1980) (plurality opinion) (footnote omitted); id. at-n.l 100 S.Ct. at 1881 n.l (Powell, J., concurring); Brown v.

United States v. Bout

144 F. Supp. 3d 477 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 26, 2015

Bout, in which Agent Brown describes Smulian as a “penetration point” and “willing partner.” 69 Arguing that Agent Brown’s choice of words reveals that the DEA recruited Smulian as a Government agent, Bout interprets the … United States v. Polouizzi, 564 F.3d 142, 159 (2d Cir.2009) (quoting United States v. Sanchez, 969 F.2d 1409, 1413 (2d Cir.1992)). . United States v.

Dickerson v. Fogg

526 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 4, 1981

Cuyler v. Sullivan, supra at 342, 100 S.Ct. at 1715 , quoting Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 309 n.6, 83 S.Ct. 745 , 755 n.6, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), quoting Brown v. … As we read Sumner v. Mata, supra, it does not change the established principle that a state court’s conclusions of law are not binding on a federal habeas court, Brown v.

Tyson v. New York City Housing Authority

369 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 9, 1974

Brown with appointed counsel constitutes a violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments because it prevented her from presenting an effective defense. … Simard v. Board of Education of Town of Groton, 473 F.2d 988, 993 (2,d Cir. 1973). Therefore, the motion to dismiss Paragraph 36 is denied. The remaining contentions of the defendants may be disposed of summarily.

Entel v. Allen

270 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jun 7, 1967

Entel v. Guilden, 223 F.Supp. 129, 133 (S.D.N.Y. 1963); Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207 (S.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir. 1961). … Brown v. Bullock, supra.

Flast v. Gardner

271 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 1967

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Baker v. Carr, supra; Steward Machine Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 , 57 S.Ct. 883 , 81 L.Ed. 1279 (1937). … Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 551 , 16 S.Ct. 1138, 1143 , 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896), overruled in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 494-495 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

The Ely

110 F. 563 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 8, 1901

BROWN, District Judge. … Law (2d Ed.) 422-424; 3 Kent, Comm. *210; Maghee v. Transportation Co., 45 N. Y. 514 , 6 Am. Rep. 124 ; Hastings v. Pepper, 11 Pick. 41 ; Lewis v. Smith, 107 Mass. 334 ; Sutcliff v. Seligman, 110 Fed. 560 .

Senno v. Elmsford Union Free School District

812 F. Supp. 2d 454 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 28, 2011

Town of Manlius, 313 F.3d 713, 718-22 (2d Cir.2002) (noting that on summary judgment, a court must “resolve all ambiguities and draw all factual inferences in favor of the non-movant” (citing Brown v. … V.

Brontel, Ltd. v. City of New York

571 F. Supp. 1065 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 23, 1983

In Lafayette v. … Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.S. 170, 198 , 41 S.Ct. 465, 466 , 65 L.Ed. 877 (1921); Israel v. City Rent & Rehab. Admin, of City of New York, supra note 11. 33 . See International House v.

Atlantic Monthly Co. v. Frederick Ungar Publishing Co.

185 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 15, 1960

Time, Inc. v. Ultem Publications, 2 Cir., 1938, 96 F.2d 164 . … Wood & Sons, Inc. v. Reese Jewelry Corp., 2 Cir., 1960, 278 F.2d 157 . Such cases as Maternally Yours v. Your Maternity Shop, supra; Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Rohrlich, 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F.2d 969 ; Tiffany & Co. v.

Green Party of State of New York v. Weiner

216 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 11, 2002

Storer v. … Buckley v.

North American Dredging & Improvement Co. v. The River Mersey

48 F. 686 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jan 8, 1892

Brown, J. The above libel was filed to recover for alleged damages to the libelant for setting on fire a scow belonging to the libelant, which was adrift at sea. … said information the libelant chartered a powerful tug, the Wade Hamilton, at Charleston, and dispatched said tug in search of the scow; * * * and that but for the wrongful act of the steamer River Mersey, and those on board

Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. v. Graphic Controls Corp.

329 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 27, 1971

Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 324 U.S. 9, 15 , 65 S.Ct. 478 , 89 L.Ed. 661 (1945). … Brown, 223 F.Supp. 219 (E.D.N.Y.1963), or where answers have been prepared and printed for questions in a copyrighted puzzle contest, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Moskowitz, et al, 127 U.S.P.Q. 523 (E.D.N.Y.1960).

McNulty v. New York City Department of Finance

45 F. Supp. 2d 296 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 5, 1999

Pro. 56(c); see also Brown v. City of Oneonta, 106 F.3d 1125, 1130 (2d Cir.1997). … Fisher v.

Luedke v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

155 B.R. 327 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 10, 1993

Brown, IV, in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Action Certification, dated Dec. 17, 1992 (“Brown Decl.”), at ¶ 3. … Barnett v. Bowen, 665 F.Supp. 1096, 1098 (D.Vt.1987).

Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.

873 F. Supp. 2d 582 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 9, 2012

Leavitt, 531 F.3d 844, 849 (D.C.Cir.2008) (finding “no problem of retroactivity” where new statute “did not retroactively alter settled law,” but “simply clarified an ambiguity in the existing legislation”); Brown v. … Lawson v.