Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnysd

10,000+ results

0.63s

  • Dolcine v. Hanson

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 12, 2021

    Levy for the general proposition that obedience is an important virtue ofthe military, but that fails to establish that Defendants’ statements qualify as stigmatizing under the relevant standard. … Further, while it is clearly established that charges of criminal conduct qualify as stigmatizing, Quinn, 613 F.2d at 446 n.4, “[a] statement that an employee . . . acted in an improper manner” generally does not qualify

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Nunez v. Bentivegna

    District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 7, 2024

    Qualified Immunity Defendants next argue that they are protected by qualified immunity. … “The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chance v. Board of Examiners

    330 F. Supp. 203 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 14, 1971

    candidates who have already qualified as licensed teachers. … regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Hayden v. International Business Machines Corporation

    District Court, S.D. New York · Dec 1, 2021

    , or other privilege or immunity. … If a Producing Party becomes aware that it has inadvertently produced information or materials that are protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product immunity, or other privilege or immunity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations v. 1030 Fifth Avenue Corp.

    833 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 20, 1993

    The adverse user in New York bears the burden of establishing adverse use by clear and convincing evidence. Speigel v. … Finally, plaintiff claims that the Residence is reserved for public or governmental purposes and is therefore immune from prescription by adverse use. PI. Prop. Find, at 29.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ramachandar v. Sobol

    838 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 15, 1993

    The Second Circuit has clearly defined the requirements for a prima facie ease under the Act. … To establish a prima facie violation of § 504, a plaintiff must prove: (1) he is a “handicapped person” under the Rehabili- . tation Act; (2) he is “otherwise qualified” for' the program; (3) he is excluded from benefits

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McCray v. Lee

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 24, 2021

    After finding that Plaintiff had failed to establish either prong of his deliberate indifference claim, the Court went on to consider Defendants’ qualified immunity defense. (See id. at 21–23.) … “Qualified immunity shields a defendant from standing trial or facing other burdens of litigation ‘if either (a) the defendant’s action did not violate clearly established law, or (b) it was objectively reasonable for the

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martinez v. United States Of America

    District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 16, 2021

    The doctrine of qualified immunity “entitles public officials to freedom from suit for acts undertaken in their official capacity if (1) their conduct does not violate clearly established constitutional rights, or (2) … Singh, they are not entitled to qualified immunity at this stage.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vasquez v. Yadali

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 5, 2020

    would still be shielded by qualified immunity. … But even if the law was clearly established, the Represented Defendants would still be entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Klein's Outlet, Inc.

    50 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 26, 1942

    He qualified October 2, 1941. The debtor filed a petition for an arrangement October 3, 1911. The same day Lipton filed an answer to the involuntary petition denying insolvency. … The papers now before the court do not clearly establish that these proceedings were brought in bad faith to defeat any claim of Rose Klein or Klein’s Outlet, Inc. *560 Since both Rose Klein, as a stockholder, and Lipton,

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • ABC v. DEF

    District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 13, 2020

    The Court further held that defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity on these claims because the fundamental rights at issue had been well-established, by a long line of Supreme Court and Second Circuit cases … Accordingly, the Court held, “at the most, qualified immunity would bar liability for a very limited portion of the two periods.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trautz v. Weisman

    819 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 6, 1993

    By maintaining the Manor’s status as a DSS-certified Adult Care Facility, its residents qualified for an elevated level of SSI. … Finding that a class of disabled individuals may fall within § 1985(3)’s protective ambit does not clearly run afoul of the statute’s express language or its present parameters.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Dick v. Lederle Antitoxin Laboratories

    43 F.2d 628 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 16, 1930

    (6) Has infringement been established? … The articles in English mentioned in the answer clearly contain nothing of moment except what was derived from European journals.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bloomberg L.P. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    649 F. Supp. 2d 262 · District Court, S.D. New York · Aug 24, 2009

    (i) Board Regulations Establish that Certain Records at the FRBNY are Agency Records of the Board. … Although hardly a model of grammatical clarity, § 261.2(i)(l) certainly establishes criteria for determining which records at FRBs qualify as Records of the Board— viz., records (1) constituting a part of the Board’s official

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. Sullivan County

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 2, 2020

    Qualified immunity shields government officials whose conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. … “The issues on qualified immunity are: (1) whether plaintiff has shown facts making out violation of a constitutional right; (2) if so, whether that right was ‘clearly established’; and (3) even if the right was ‘clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ivers v. Keene Corp.

    148 F.R.D. 91 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 15, 1993

    The opinions rendered by Keene’s counsel, as well as the underlying facts and information passed to Keene from counsel, are clearly relevant to the central issue of scienter. … Hence, the attorney work-product privilege will not immunize the documents from discovery.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • United States v. Olin Ski Co., Inc.

    503 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 25, 1980

    Specifically, the FTC concluded that Olin Ski, in conjunction with some dealers, had attempted “to fix, establish and maintain certain resale or re *143 tail prices at which said products are resold to the general public. … While courts should always strive to find internal consistency when interpreting documents such as this consent order, when none can be found the terms of the most applicable provision clearly must control.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ballentine v. State of New York

    District Court, S.D. New York · Nov 21, 2024

    By contrast, to comport with Congress’s Section 5 authority, a plaintiff seeking money damages from the state in federal court under the ADA must “establish that the Title II violation was motivated by discriminatory animus … or ill will based on the plaintiff's disability,” in order to validly abrogate Eleventh Amendment immunity.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Polur v. Raffe

    727 F. Supp. 810 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 14, 1989

    Barr qualified as executors of his estate. The remaining shareholders did not call a meeting to elect a director to replace Kaufman, in violation of the Puccini’s shareholders’ agreement. … Here, Polur’s suits in both the state and federal courts establish a history of vexatious litigation against FKMF and Schneider.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vaughn

    District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2026

    A “qualified individual” is one who “meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in programs or 5 To the extent that Mr. … Vaughn is pleading a Fourteenth Amendment due process violation, he fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted because the Amended Complaint clearly alleges that he received notice of his termination and had

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.