Case law

Vera, Inc. v. TUG" DAKOTA"

769 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 1, 1991

On May 27, 1991, Deakin boarded the Dakota, which was then berthed at Vera’s pier in the Port of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, took control of the vessel and sailed her to Newtown Creek in Brooklyn, New York, where the vessel … Corp. v. Ira S.

Kennel v. Dover Garage, Inc.

816 F. Supp. 178 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 18, 1993

This new arrangement was effectuated through a Collective Bargaining Agreement (the “CBA”), between the Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade (the “Board”), of which Dover was a member, and the Taxi Drivers and Allied Workers … Watson v.

Hersch v. United States

685 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 1988

See, e.g., Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, 368 U.S. 278, 287 , 82 S.Ct. 275, 281 , 7 L.Ed.2d 285 (1961); Hoffman Estates, supra, 455 U.S. at 499 , 102 S.Ct. at 1193-94 . … For example, in Collins v.

New York v. Evans

162 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 12, 2001

Miles & Co. v. … See Marsh v. Ore. Natural Res.

Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Work

676 F. Supp. 1254 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 15, 1987

Bend Electronics, 586 F.Supp. 478, 483 (D.Nev.1984) (plaintiffs decision to continue manufacturing its double board program without copyright notice until its scheduled conversion to a single board program, which did include … See, e.g., Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242, 244 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918).

Tenenbaum v. Williams

907 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 20, 1995

.”); Woodard v. … United States v. Allen, 337 F.Supp. 1041 (E.D.Pa.1972) (requiring search warrant for x-ray of criminal suspect); State v. Mahon, 648 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn.Crim.App.1982) (same); see also United States v.

Franco v. Marina District Development Company, LLC

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 21, 2022

Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 356 (2d Cir. 2011). Such requirements include establishing that the amount in controversy exceeds the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). … See, Noguera v. Bedard, 2011 WL 5117598, at *3 (E.D.N.Y.

United States v. Mosquera

813 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 10, 1993

Fed.R.Crim.P. 2 See, e.g., United States v. … See United States v. Oliver, 626 F.2d 254, 259 (2d Cir.1980). Such determinations are to be made on a case by case basis. United States v.

Smith v. Macy's Corporate

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 2019

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Brown v. Coach Stores, Inc., 163 F.3d 706, 712 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). “The administrative exhaustion requirement applies to pro se and counseled plaintiffs alike.”

Pradhan v. Maleen Banquet Hall LLC

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 29, 2023

v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … In Gallaher v.

Shell Oil Co. v. Hillary Farmer Service Station, Inc.

739 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 1990

See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 247 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2509 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). The burden rests on the movant to demonstrate the lack of a genuine issue of fact. See Adickes v. S.H. … United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993, 994 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962).

Fontaine v. CGI

District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 16, 2025

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)); see also Harris v. … Because these allegations “consist[ ] of nothing more than conclusory allegations that [Plaintiff] was mistreated as a result of h[er] race,” Brown v. Greene, No. 11-CV- 4917 (BMC), 2012 WL 911560, at *3 (E.D.N.Y.

Jimenez v. Rise Boro

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 6, 2025

Matson v. Bd. of Educ., 631 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2011) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Mar. 13, 2019) (denying motion to appoint counsel with leave to renew “when [the] case is trial ready, if warranted at that time”); Brown v. Moralles, No. 14-CV-1382, 2014 WL 6610992, at *11 (E.D.N.Y.

Hlavac-Maass v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 6, 2024

Id. § 404.1520(a)(4)(v). … Brown D. Brown, PsyD, appears to have reviewed some of the plaintiff’s medical records but did not personally examine her. (Tr. 64–65.) Dr.

Vetcher v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 18, 2023

Kiobel v. … See Butcher v.

Quarles v. Columbia Sussex Corp.

997 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 9, 1998

Board of Education of City of New York, 117 AD.2d 704, 498 N.Y.S.2d 440 (2d Dep’t 1986), the plaintiff tripped over a box in an aisle — which was not there fifteen minutes before — and although the court acknowledged that … Cook v.

Tillman v. Grenadier Realty Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 12, 2024

Moorehead subsequently recommended Plaintiff’s termination to Grenadier’s Board of Directors. (Def. 56.1 ¶ 154.) … By comparison, in Burger v.

Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds and the Trustees of the Local 1010 Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement, and Training Fund v. Toros Brothers Construction Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 24, 2025

Labarbera v. ASTC Labs., Inc., 752 F. Supp. 2d 263, 270 (E.D.N.Y. 2010); see also TAGC Mgmt., LLC v. Lehman, Lee & Xu Ltd., 536 F. … Pig Newton, Inc. v. The Boards of Directors of The Motion Picture Indus. Pension Plan, No. 13-cv-7312, 2016 WL 796840, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2016).

Richardson-Holness v. Alexander

161 F. Supp. 3d 170 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 19, 2015

See Piscottano v. … .”); Anderson v.

Moss v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

22 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 7, 1998

In their analysis of Cort v. … City v. Bloomberg L.P., 118 F.3d 917, 928 (2d Cir.1997). Furthermore, the Supreme Court has differentiated between political speech and commercial speech. See, e.g., Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.