Case law

Kanwar v. Walgreen Company

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 27, 2021

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5-CV- --------------- 5579, 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). The Court finds no clear error in the portions of Judge Shields’ R&R to which there are no specific objections.

Holloway v. The City of New York

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 28, 2020

See Knight v. City of New York, No. 20-2974, 2020 WL 7062464, at *1 (2d Cir. Oct. 21, 2020); Brown v. Faucher, No. 19-3898, 2020 WL 833854, at *1 (2d Cir. Jan 10, 2020); Laboy v. … Dec. 12, 2019); Sanders v. United States, No. 17-CV-3593, 2018 WL 3148348, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. June 27, 2018); Fulton v. Monroe Cty. Supreme Court, No. 18-CV-6386, 2018 WL 10070314, at *2 (W.D.N.Y.

Hankerson v. Royce

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 7, 2023

See McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 133 (2010). A. … Brown, 927 F.3d 639, 656 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Rivas v.

Chiu v. American Yuexianggui of LI LLC

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2021

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05–CV–5579, --------------- 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

Kail v. Rockefeller

275 F. Supp. 937 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 14, 1967

In Buchanan v. … County School Board of Prince Edward County, 1964, 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 ).

Northeast Mines, Inc. v. Town of Smithtown

584 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 3, 1984

FACTS On March 11, 1980, plaintiffs’ application for an excavation permit was approved by the Board of the Town of Smithtown. The permit was issued for one year and expires January 27, 1984. … Kent Island Joint Venture v. Smith, 452 F.Supp. 455, 461 (D.Md. 1978). I. “Younger Abstention” “Younger v.

Jimenez v. Vargas

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 11, 2025

However, “the Fourth Amendment prohibits the use of excessive force in making an arrest, and whether the force used is excessive is to be analyzed under that Amendment’s reasonableness standard,” Brown v. … Brown Gary R. Brown United States District Judge

Delaremore v. Zimmer Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 29, 2021

Brown v. City of New York, 391 F. App’x 935, 936 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary order) (quoting Ruzsa v. Rubenstein & Sendy Atty’s at Law, 520 F.3d 176, 177 (2d Cir. 2008)). All the factors are met here.

Trotman v. Doe

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 27, 2020

As plaintiff describes, on “Sunday May 6th 2018 inmate Brown threw urine and did not pass the plaintiff his breakfast. … Brown _____ GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

WG Woodmere LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Woodsburgh

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 12, 2025

The town board extended the moratorium six times. Id. ¶ 155. … Plaintiffs appealed that denial to Hempstead’s zoning board of appeals. Id.

Sentry Insurance v. Brand Management Inc.

120 F. Supp. 3d 277 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 2015

Co. v. … There is typically one annual board of directors meeting, and Naftoly attends on some occasions.

Standard Oil Co. v. McAllister

74 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 8, 1947

not in such place, and assuming that the master of the tug was correct that the Esso was partly in the anchorage grounds, we, nevertheless, have all the witnesses contradicting the assertion that the Esso had no lights on board … Co. v. Jakobson & Peterson, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 325 -328; James McWilliams Blue Line v. Prospect, D.C., 60 F.Supp. 257 -259. The Grace R., D.C., 66 F.Supp. 376 -378.

Laufer v. Heckler

566 F. Supp. 860 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 6, 1983

That hearing satisfied the due process requirements prescribed in Mathews v. … Magee v. Califano, 494 F.Supp. 162, 166 (W.D.N.Y.1980); Memoli v.

U.S. Bank National Association v. McHugh

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 29, 2019

BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff U.S. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States Magistrate Judge

Villanti v. Cold Spring Harbor Central School District

733 F. Supp. 2d 371 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 20, 2010

See Treglia, 313 F.3d at 720 ; Weixel v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 287 F.3d 138, 149 (2d Cir.2002) (citing Muller v. Costello, 187 F.3d 298, 311 (2d Cir.1999)). … Thomas v.

Turano v. Zucker

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 13, 2021

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5-CV-5579, 2006 WL --------------- 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

Lynch v. The Edward S. Atwood

82 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 25, 1949

The planes and boxes belonged to the Army, and were delivered for its account on board the scow, which was berthed at Pier 40, on January 12, 1944. 2. … Harms Co. v. Erie R. Co., 2 Cir., 167 F.2d 562 . Nor is it needed to go so far as to assert that the Atwood 'became an insurer of ° the scow.

North Star Contracting Corp. v. Long Island Rail Road

723 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 25, 1989

Zimmerman Brush Co., 455 U.S. 422, 433 , 102 S.Ct. 1148, 1156 , 71 L.Ed.2d 265 (1981) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 570-71 n. 8, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 2705-06 n. 8, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496, 516 , 102 S.Ct. 2557, 2568 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982).

Henkin v. Kuveyt Turk Katilim Bankasi A.S.

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 16, 2025

The Court does so, following the Second Circuit’s instructions, “[i]n light of [the Second Circuit’s] decisions in Honickman v. BLOM Bank SAL, 6 F.4th 487 (2d Cir. 2021); Kaplan v. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Goines v. Walker

54 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 3, 1999

See People v. … Brown, 81 A.D.2d 619 , 437 N.Y.S.2d 701, 701-02 (2d Dep’t 1981) (The “only basis for the jury’s not guilty verdict on the charge of [Possession, Third Degree] would be acceptance of defendant’s agency and/or entrapment defenses