Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
1.26s
755 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 18, 1991
And in United States v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Neagle, 486 F.Supp. 364 (S.D.W.Va.1979).
Cited 8 timesPublished114 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 6, 1953
In the case of McLean v. … The Appellate Division, Third Department, in the case of Armstrong v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKrasnyi Oktyabr, Inc. v. Trilini Imports
578 F. Supp. 2d 455 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 25, 2008
Teachers’ Ass’n v. Board of Educ., 478 F.3d 494, 498 (2d Cir.2007) (quoting Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992)). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). Here, defendants have failed to meet their burden in showing a product market.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAlzheimer's Disease Resource Center, Inc. v. Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Ass'n
981 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 8, 2013
See Weixel v. … In response, the ADRC’s board of directors voted to disaffiliate from the Association.
Cited 13 timesPublishedOtrompke, JD v. Catholic Charities Alliance
District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 3, 2024
Brown v. Halpin, 885 F.3d 111, 118 (2d Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity prevents federal courts from hearing Section 1983 suits against states unless they consent, see Dube v. … Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678; see, e.g., Maltese v. Brown, No. 23-CV-4566 (RPK) (LB), 2024 WL 3875940, at *4 (E.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDolginko v. Long Island Rail Road
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 26, 2024
Chavis v. … Only upon one or more of these bases may a court set aside an order of the Adjustment Board.” Union Pac. R. Co. v. Sheehan, 439 U.S. 89, 93 (1978) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 153). None of these rounds apply here.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHilditch v. American Bumper Corporation
15 F.2d 451 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 4, 1926
The patent was sustained in 1916 by Judge Mantón, in the District Court, in the suit of Lyon Non-Skid Co. v. Edward V. … In that case the complainant was not engaged in manufacturing the patented elevators, but prior to the commencement of the suit, by resolution of its board of directors, it established a royalty or license fee of $250 for
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Sep 20, 2022
. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5-CV-5579, 2006 WL --------------- 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). The Court finds no clear error in the portions of Magistrate Judge Lindsay’s R&R to which there are no objections.
Cited 0 timesUnknown514 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 5, 1980
Relying on Perry v. … Contrary to plaintiffs’ position, the facts in the instant action are in line with those in Board of Regents v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJenkins v. Cargo of 9,250 Bags of Sugar
47 F. 76 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1891
The case of Metcalfe v. Iron-Works Co., 2 Q. B. Div. 423, (Ct. … Div. 635) in Metcalfe v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation
523 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 30, 2007
Brown, V, who was the successor to defendant Mr. Bess as Chairman of the Gaming Authority. B. … See, e.g., Paradis v. Town of Schroeppel, 289 A.D.2d 1027 , 735 N.Y.S.2d 278, 278 (N.Y.App.Div.2001) (invalidating town board resolution purporting to amend town zoning code provision); accord No- *249 ghrey v.
Vacated on other grounds by State of New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation, 686 F.3d 133 (2012)Cited 11 timesPublishedIn Re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation
727 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 28, 2010
Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 40 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 , 84 S.Ct. 805 , 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964)). … See, e.g., Dietz v.
Cited 3 timesPublished833 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 1993
In light of [United States v. … See United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublished600 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 29, 1984
Board of Directors. 5. Defendants have answered the complaint in this action and have denied all charges asserted against them and raised defenses to the claims set forth therein. 6. … Brod & Co. v. Perlow, 375 F.2d 393 (2d Cir.1967); SEC v. Globus International Ltd., 320 F.Supp. 158 (S.D.N.Y.1970).
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2019
(the “Monastery”), the New York City Environmental Control Board (the “Control Board”), and New York City Department of Finance (“Department of Finance”) (collectively “Defendants”), under New York Real Property … The Control Board and the Department of Finance (the “Non-appearing Defendants”) did not appear in the action.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCousin v. Office of Thrift Supervision
840 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 29, 1993
For some years plaintiff was Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Cross County Federal Savings Bank (the Bank). … Co. v. Kennedy, 301 U.S. 389, 393 , 57 S.Ct. 809, 812 , 81 L.Ed. 1177 (1937).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCason v. Federal Protective Service Officer Valentine
District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 25, 2023
Rochester v. County of Nassau, 10-CV-6017 (PKC)(SLT), 2019 WL 955032, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2019); see Tapia-Ortiz v. … Brown January 25, 2023 Gary R. Brown United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Mar 14, 2022
Brown v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., 474 F. Supp. 3d 637, 643 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting Hickman v. … See Daval Steel Prods. v. M/V Fakredine, 951 F.2d 1357, 1367 (2d Cir. 1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknownRand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc.
623 F. Supp. 176 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 2, 1985
Teltronics also made a second attempt at revival in August through agreements with defendant Telecom Equipment Corp., of which defendant Cohen is chairman of the board. … Nordberg v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Nov 10, 2021
Brown’s instructions for submitting Pretrial Orders, the parties were ordered to revise the Pretrial Order. (Id.) … As such, Judge Brown has not yet set a trial date for this case.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna