Case law

Langer v. Paysafe Partners LP

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2022

report and recommendation on a dispositive motion, a court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which objection[s] [are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown … v.

American Motor Club, Inc. v. Neu (In re American Motor Club, Inc.)

143 B.R. 590 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 11, 1992

(“BIM”), Tillex’s subsidiary and Debtor’s direct parent, that it vote to remove the Debtor’s Board of Directors and dismiss Neu. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). As the Supreme Court in Anderson v.

Anderson v. Nassau County Department of Corrections

376 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 6, 2005

Pending before the Court is a motion by the Defendants to disqualify the law firm of Leeds Morelli & Brown (“Leeds”) from its representation of the Plaintiff. I. … Fund of Funds, Ltd. v.

United States Gypsum Co. v. McWilliams

60 F.2d 132 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 8, 1932

He says his ladder was too short to enable him to board the barge,■ and, after unsuccessfully trying to pull the barge in near enough to accomplish that purpose, he waited around a little while, and then went to his home … The bargee was the agent of the owner with respect to tending the lines; see Dailey v. Carroll (C. C. A.) 248 F. 466 .

M. H. Renken Dairy Co. v. Wickard

45 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 18, 1942

Clark v. Portland General Electric Co., 9 Cir., 111 F.2d 703 ; Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corporation v. … Administrator, 312 U.S. 126, 657 , 61 S.Ct. 524 , 85 L.Ed. 624 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; Green Valley Creamery v.

Kennaugh v. Miller

150 F. Supp. 2d 421 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 20, 2001

According to petitioner’s brief on direct appeal, the official police arrest report described petitioner as 21 years of age, brown hair, brown eyes, 5'10", 140 pounds. Brief on Behalf of Defendant-Appellant, at 5 n.2. … Petitioner’s arrest report describes him as having brown hair. Brief on Behalf of Defendant-Appellant, at 5 n.2.

Biggs v. Block

629 F. Supp. 1574 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 1986

See, e.g., Quern v. Jordan, 440 U.S. 332 , 99 S.Ct. 1139 , 59 L.Ed.2d 358 (1979); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978); Milliken v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977); Lincoln County v. Luning, 133 U.S. 529 , 10 S.Ct. 363 , 33 L.Ed. 766 (1890); see also Monell v.

Cuban American Sugar Co. v. Cayo Mambi S. S. Corp.

1 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 8, 1932

the libellant, but not in the same good order and condition as when shipped, but, on the contrary, seriously injured and damaged by reason of having come in contact with sea water and other damaging substances while on board … The only ease submitted on this question is Reid v. Fargo, supra. While there is some difference between Reid v. Fargo, supra, and the case at bar, the principle is not unlike. In Reid v.

Wilburn v. Nguyen

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 23, 2023

Corp. v. … See, e.g., United States v. Wilburn, No. 19-cr- 108, ECF No. 233; United States v. Brown, et al., No. 19-cr-139-04, ECF No. 191.

United States v. All Funds on Deposit in Any Accounts Maintained at Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

801 F. Supp. 984 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 5, 1992

There was testimony that it is common knowledge in the streets and board rooms of Colombia that the source of the millions of American dollars in circulation in this “black” market is largely the drug trade in New York and … Brown v. Advantage Eng’g, 732 F.Supp. 1163, 1170 (N.D.Ga.1990); Keister v. Dow Chem. Co., 723 F.Supp. 117, 120 (E.D.Ark.1989).

Pepe v. Suffolk County Department of Civil Service

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 4, 2025

V. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

Finkel v. Samco Electric Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 2023

Trs. of Empire State Carpenters Annuity v. J. Careri Constr. Co., 2016 WL 492145, at *1 n.1 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing D.H. Blair & Co. v. … Blair, 462 F.3d at 110 (quoting Florasynth, Inc. v. Pickholz, 750 F.2d 171, 176 (2d Cir. 1984)).

Mejia v. Barnhart

261 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 16, 2003

Tejada v. Apfel, 167 F.3d 770, 773 (2d Cir.1999); Johnson v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 983, 985 (2d Cir.1987); Townley v. Heckler, 748 F.2d 109, 112 (2d Cir.1984). … Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1999).

Espinosa v. Nassau County Correctional Center

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2021

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

PILITZ v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

762 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 2, 2011

Stair v. Calhoun, 722 F.Supp.2d 258, 267 (E.D.N.Y.2010) (citing N.Y. Judiciary Law § 475 ); see also Sequa Corp. v. … Initially, the Incorporated Village of Rock-ville Centre, its Board of Trustees and certain individuals employed by the Village of Rock-ville Centre were named as additional defendants.

Andree Ex Rel. Andree v. County of Nassau

311 F. Supp. 2d 325 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 26, 2004

Dist. v. … The burden is on the plaintiff to “negative ‘any reasonably conceived state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification.’ ” Board of Trustees v. Univ. of Ala. v.

United States v. Gutierrez

624 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 6, 1985

See, e.g., Konsler v. United States, 288 F.Supp. 895 (N.D.Ill.1968) (Illinois dram shop act imposes liability without fault and does not require a showing of negligence). … Delta argued that the incidents complained of were at most, “technical violations of an isolated nature and that the Board did not intend that there should be strict liability imposed on carriers for every failure to comply

Dobroff v. Hempstead Union Free School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2022

V. The Motion to Amend is Denied A. … The alleged Anti-Semitic comments by audience members at Board meetings do not support a discriminatory animus on the part of the Board.

South Shore Nav. Co. v. Bridgeport Dredge & Dock Co.

2 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 13, 1932

Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co. (C. C. A.) 296 F. 855, 857 , seems to apply. In that case, a fire occurred on the steamship St. … Co. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. (C. C. A.) 281 F. 97 ], and respondents, the bailees, were to do the work with their own servants, at their own yard.

Sikarevich Family L.P. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

30 F. Supp. 3d 166 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 3, 2014

Poliak, Gary Brown, and Ramon E. Reyes (the “Committee”), and is therefore subject to orders governing those cases. The Committee issued Case Management Order No. … Kings Choice Neckwear, Inc. v.