Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
1.66s
124 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 7, 2000
Schultz v. … Litig., Ill F.R.D. 675, 686 & n. 7 (N.D.Cal.1986) (either California law would apply “across the board” or subclasses would be employed; otherwise, class could be decertified or modifications could be made in structure of
Cited 42 timesPublishedKilkenny, as Trustees of the Construction Council Local 175 Annuity Fund v. Manco Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2023
Brown v. Sandimo Materials, 250 F.3d 120, 128 n.2 (2d Cir. 2001) (citing Lihli, 80 F.3d at 747). “Separate companies are considered a single employer if they are part of a single integrated enterprise.” Id. … Technicians Local Union 1264 v. Broad. Serv. of Mobile, Inc., 380 U.S. 255, 256 (1965).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEpstein v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Epstein)
303 B.R. 280 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 12, 2004
Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct. 654 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991); Langlois v. United States, 155 B.R. 818, 820 (N.D.N.Y.1993). … In re Haesloop v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFinkelshteyn v. Staten Island University Hospital
687 F. Supp. 2d 66 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2009
See, e.g., Brown v. AstraZ *82 eneca Pharm., L.P., No. 03-CV-6166, 2006 WL 2376380 , at *8 (E.D.N.Y. … Brown, 2006 WL 2376380 at *7. That nexus is lacking here.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Aug 10, 2022
Lamb v. Cuomo, 698 F. App’x 1, 2 (2d Cir. 2017) (citing Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000)). … Brown _______________________ Hon. Gary R.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSanossian v. Valley Stream Central High School District
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2022
. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05–CV–5579, --------------- 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHart v. American Concrete Steel Co.
278 F. 541 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 9, 1921
The case of Williams v. Gíenny, 16 N. … Gearty v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 171 N. Y. 61 , 63 N. E. 804 ; Caldwell & Drake v. Schmulbach (C. C.) 175 Fed. 429 ; Wilson v. Curran, 190 App. Div. 581 , 180 N. Y. Supp. 337 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedMiranti v. Amalgamated Industrial Toy & Novelty Workers of America Local 223
District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 23, 2022
Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWright v. Bujnowski (In Re Wright)
209 B.R. 276 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 19, 1997
To the extent that Tinker v. … See In re Brown, 201 B.R. 411, 413-14 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1996) (citing cases on both sides).
Cited 3 timesPublished248 F. Supp. 3d 401 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2017
This conclusion flows directly from the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Brown v. … In Martinez v. City of Schenectady, 97 N.Y.2d 78 , 735 N.Y.S.2d 868 , 761 N.E.2d 560 (2001), building on its decision in Brown v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedKennedy v. Bethpage Union Free School District
District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 8, 2022
In fact, under New York law, “a Superintendent is subject to the direction and supervision of the Board of Education, and has no vote on Board decisions.” Jones v. Bay Shore Union Free Sch. Dist., 170 F. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). “In general, the nature and contours of a specific property interest are defined by some source independent of the Constitution—most often state law.” Ezekwo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. New York · May 7, 2026
In December 2005, the only superior officer in SCPD with the last name “Brown” was Deputy Inspector Robert Brown. See id. ¶ 2. … Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011).
Cited 0 timesUnknown646 F. Supp. 1528 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 7, 1986
Baldwin v. … United States v. Brown, 699 F.2d 585, 591 (2d Cir.1983); Klein v. Harris, 667 F.2d 274, 290 (2d Cir.1981). A review of the Drayton and Gathers evidence discloses that it pertained to two relatively insignificant points.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMulti-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Kennedy
District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 20, 2025
Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Triaxx Asset Mgmt. LLC, No. 18-cv-4044 (BCM), 2020 WL 9549505, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. … See Van Wagenen v. Consol.
Cited 0 timesUnknown691 F. Supp. 2d 344 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2010
The Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) had previously interpreted the language of INA § 203(h)(3) in In re Wang, 25 I. & N. Dec. 28 (B.I.A. June 16, 2009) (Interim Decision). … . *355 v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Jul 11, 2025
Aggarwala, in his capacity as Commissioner of the City’s Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”); and the New York City Water Board (“Water Board”). … See Kerry v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFedtro, Inc. v. Kravex Manufacturing Corp.
313 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 26, 1970
Orgel v. Clark Boardman Co., 2d Cir. 1962, 301 F.2d 119 , brings that out equally sharply. The propriety, too, of making allowance for overhead costs is explicitly recognized in Neal v. … See Westerman Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co., 1919, 249 U.S. 100, 105-106 , 39 S.Ct. 194 , 63 L.Ed. 499 ; Davis v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., S.D.N.Y.1966, 249 F.Supp. 329, 336-338 .
Cited 5 timesPublished261 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 2003
V. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 313 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHackett v. Continental Can Co.
518 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 30, 1981
See Lanza v. Drexel Co., 479 F.2d 1277, 1299 (2d Cir. 1973) (en banc). … See Ernst & Ernst Co. v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 194 , 96 S.Ct. 1375, 1381 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); Rolf v.
Cited 2 timesPublished3 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 1933
When she set out from Bridgeport, the tug had only two deck hands instead of three, as required, and had but one licensed man on board instead of two. … See McGill v. Michigan Steamship Co. (C. C. A.) 144 F. 788 . For the foregoing reasons the petition must in all respects be dismissed. Settle decree on notice.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna