Case law

Plaut v. One Hundred & Seven Barrels of Porto Rican Bay Rum

165 F. 941 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 10, 1908

The seizure of the bay rum by the marshal upon the process issued, as-shown by the return and records of the marshal, occurred upon the 19th day of October, 1908, on board the steamer S. V. … S. v. Neb. Dist. Co., 80 Fed. 285, 25 C. C. A. 418 .

Dingfelder v. Navigazione Libera Triestina, S. A.

2 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 3, 1933

A part of the shipment was condemned by the board of health. … Arkell & Douglas v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 13 F.(2d) 555 .

Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC v. Paradise Organization Corp. a/k/a Paradise Organization, Inc., Sonu Chadha and Deepak Chadha

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 12, 2026

Nat'l Bank v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

Epstein v. Evergreen Computer Solutions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 2022

Young v. … Brown GARY R.

Evans v. Artuz

68 F. Supp. 2d 188 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1999

See generally Gaiter v. Lord, 917 F.Supp. 145, 152 (E.D.N.Y.1996) (“the Federal Constitution does not require a defendant’s presence at sidebar conferences”); accord Brown v. Edwards, No. 96 Civ. 3444, 1998 U.S. Dist. … Neither did he ask to consult further with his client without the board. 6 . Agard v. Portuondo was filed before the effective date of the AEDPA, and was not reviewed under the stricter standards of that law. 7 .

Hagemann v. Molinari

14 F. Supp. 2d 277 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 6, 1998

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See San Filippo v. U.S.

Goodman v. Callado

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 20, 2021

The conversation was interrupted by a side conversation between Brown and Goodman, after which Brown was sent to retrieve “something”, R. 9-2 at 37–38, and to return with it. … See Smith v.

United States v. Benn

441 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 25, 1977

Barnes, on the passenger side, held a small brown manila envelope which he was “attempting to put away”. Although told not to move he dropped it between the right hand door and the seat. … United States v. Clark, 531 F.2d 928, 932 (8th Cir., 1976); United States v. Johnson, 541 F.2d 1311, 1316 (8th Cir., 1976); United States v. Truitt, 521 F.2d 1174 (6th Cir., 1975); United States v.

Glasgold v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

558 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 7, 1982

V. … Under the bill, the value of room and board, regardless of whether any payment was made for room and board, would be assumed to be equal to one-third of the applicable benefit standard. H.R.Rep.

Lemberger v. Heckler

579 F. Supp. 49 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 17, 1984

Jennie Mauceri, a board certified specialist in psychiatry and neurology, who diagnosed him as suffering from “depressive reaction of a rather severe degree.” Exh. 18. … Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 705 F.2d 638, 642 (2d Cir.1983); Eiden v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 616 F.2d 63, 64 (2d Cir.1980); Alvarado v.

United States v. Norris

143 F. Supp. 2d 243 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 27, 2001

See, e.g., United States v. Scheele, 231 F.3d 492, 497, n. 2 , (9th Cir.2000); United States v. Meshack, 225 F.3d 556, 576 (5th Cir.2000); United States v. Williams, 235 F.3d 858, 862 (3d Cir.2000); United States v. … Brown, 217 F.3d 247 (5th Cir.2000), ce rt. granted , — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1072 , 148 L.Ed.2d 950 (2001); United States v.

United States ex rel. Viscardi v. MacDonald

265 F. 695 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 4, 1920

In Bishop v. United States, 197 U. S. 334 , 25 Sup. Ct. 440, 49 L. Ed. 780 , and in United States v. Smith, 197 U. S. 386 , 25 Sup. Ct. 489, 49 L. … Santantonio v.

Olsen v. South Huntington Union Free School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 26, 2024

In any case, the defendants contend that the ultimate hiring and firing authority for District food service workers lies exclusively with the District’s Board of Education (the “Board”). … May 1, 2024) (citing Brown v. Northrop Grumman Corp., No. 12-CV-1488 (JS)(GRB), 2014 WL 4175795, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2014) (citation omitted)).

Van Zuch v. United States

118 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 20, 1954

In Feres v. … United States, D.C., 116 F.Supp. 1 , which follows Sigmon v. United States, supra. Brown v.

Gamarra v. Supervisor Paul

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 17, 2024

Hills v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 14-CV-328S, 2015 WL 1243337, *3 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2015) (citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979). … Brown GARY R.

Paz v. Long Island Railroad

954 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 12, 1997

See generally Webb v. Board of Educ. of Dyer County, Tenn., 471 U.S. 234, 241 , 105 S.Ct. 1923, 1927-28 , 85 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985) (noting similarity in relevant language regarding fee awards under § 1988 and Title VII). … See Rosa v. Blake Bus.

United States Ex Rel. Ayala v. Tubman

366 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 26, 1973

Ervin v. Sawner, 322 F.Supp. 1108 (S.D.N.Y.1971), United States ex rel. Jimenez v. Conboy, 310 F.Supp. 801 (S.D.N.Y.1970); United States ex rel. Griffin v. LaVallee, 270 F.Supp. 531 (E.D.N.Y.1967) (Weinstein, J.). … See Grimes v. Hull-Dobbs, Inc., 154 F.Supp. 151 (E.D.Ky.1957).

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc.

127 F. Supp. 847 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 3, 1955

In the case of Pike v. … He was asked whether it would have been good practice to use flashover boards, (a device designed to prevent an arc from crossing from one insulator to another) and he answered “Flash-over boards are desirable but not essential

Skeen

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 25, 2026

Brown Affidavit § 11. Such satisfies RPAPL’s notice requirements. CIT Bank N.A. v. Schiffman, 999 F.3d 113, 117 (2d Cir. 2021); Paugh, 332 F. Supp. 2d at 68. … June 14, 2024); Brown v. Amarante, 2024 WL 4716364 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 8, 2024), report and recommendation adopted, 2025 WL 934318 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. See also Tanasi v. CitiMortgage, Inc. 257 F. Supp. 3d 232, 260 (D.

Abramson v. United States

48 B.R. 809 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 2, 1985

Abramson, who was the Secretary-Treasurer and a board member, owned 30% of the shares (capital contribution of $15,000). … Weiss, who owned 70% of the shares (capital contribution of $50,000), was President and a board member. Mrs. Weiss, who worked part time as the bookkeeper, was the third board member.