Case law

Levesque v. Kings County Lafayette Trust Co.

293 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 19, 1968

Goldwater v. Ginzberg, 261 F.Supp. 784, 787 (S.D.N.Y.1966). … Pecue v. West, 233 N.Y. 316, 323 , 135 N.E. 515, 517 .

Rossito-Canty v. Cuomo

86 F. Supp. 3d 175 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 16, 2015

See, e.g., Brown v. … Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Topeka, Kan., 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955); Loving v.

Desch v. Merz North America, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 28, 2022

United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., 863 F.3d 125, 134 (2d Cir. 2017). … Alcon Vision, LLC v. Lens.com, No. 18-cv-0407, 2020 WL 3791865, at *6 (E.D.N.Y. July 7, 2020) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Brown v.

Otte v. Franklin National Bank of Franklin Square

179 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 29, 1959

“Was the bank on notice that the bankrupt’s board of directors had not approved the resolution?” The answer to this question is negative. 2. … The plaintiff’s reliance upon Benedict v.

In Re :Charlesetta O'Neal

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 31, 2022

See Bey v. Brown, No. 21-CV-1072, 2021 WL 3836818, at *2–3 (D. Conn. Aug. 24, 2021) (collecting cases). … See Brown, 2021 WL 3836818, at *2–3; see also El Ameen Bey v. Stumpf, 825 F. Supp. 2d 537, 551 (D.N.J. 2011) (“The . . .

Lafontant v. Aristide

844 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 27, 1994

May 13, 1983) (Swiss court is “organ” of state); Rios v. Marshall, 530 F.Supp. 351 (S.D.N.Y.1981) (foreign labor board is “instrumentality” under FSIA, thus entitling board officials to protection). … California State Board of Equalization, 858 F.2d 1376 , 1382 n. 5 (9th Cir.1988) in context of a suit against foreign sovereign); Filartiga v.

Ventre v. Oetker

214 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 21, 1963

Plaintiff and other employees of International boarded the vessel at Pier 2, Erie Basin, Brooklyn, New York, at 7 A. M., for the purpose of unloading the vessel. … At the trial, plaintiff stipulated that the vessel was seaworthy at 7 A.M., when International's men boarded the vessel.

Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. Fishing Vessel Ocean Spray

160 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 12, 1957

See The Jack-O-Lantern, 258 U.S. 96 , 42 S.Ct. 243 , 66 L.Ed. 482 ; Hercules Co., *817 Inc., v. The Brigadier General Absolom Baird, 3 Cir., 214 F.2d 66 . The claimant’s reliance upon Murray v. … As to the allowance for his services, the report states that there were 26 hearings, including two entire days spent on board the vessel; 1,300 pages of testimony were taken and upwards of 100 exhibits were received in evidence

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Baltimore

47 F. Supp. 770 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 10, 1942

Huntley v. Empire Engineering Corporation, 2 Cir., 211 F. 959 ; Federal Motorship Corporation v. … Tanker Hygrade No. 12, Inc., v. American Pipe & Construction Co. et al., D.C., 33 F.Supp. 652 ; affirmed without opinion 2 Cir., 120 F.2d 1011 .

Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. v. Executive Protection One Security Service, LLC

553 F. Supp. 2d 201 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 10, 2008

Where, as here, the application for fees is voluminous, the court may order an across-the-board percentage reduction in compensable hours. In re “Agent Orange” Product Liab. … See, e.g., Kuzma v.

Perez v. County of Nassau

294 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 23, 2003

Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276 , 105 S.Ct. 1938 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); see also Pearl v. City of Long Beach, 296 F.3d 76 , 81 (2d Cir.2002); Spigner v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 150 n. 3, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984), the Supreme Court also warned that: [procedural requirements established by Congress for gaining access to the federal courts are not to be disregarded

Conway v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

236 F. Supp. 2d 241 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 7, 2002

See Foster, 2000 WL 145927 , at *4; see also Brown v. Nationseredit Commercial, 99 CV 592, 2000 WL 888507 , at *1 (D.Conn. … Brown v. Nationscredit Commercial, 99 CV 592, 2000 WL 888507 , at *1 (D.Conn. June 23, 2000).

Martin v. J.C. Penney Corp.

28 F. Supp. 3d 153 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 10, 2014

Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec. Corp., 7 F.3d 1085 , 1087 (2d Cir.1993); Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 339 (2d Cir.2000). … See Drayton v. Toys “R” Us Inc., 645 F.Supp.2d 149, 163-64 (S.D.N.Y.2009); N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-130; Williams v.

Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.

101 F. Supp. 3d 217 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2015

Quinn, 958 F.Supp.2d at 541 (quoting Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., 913 F.Supp.2d 881, 890 (N.D.Cal.2012)). … GBL § 349 “prohibits deceptive and misleading business practices and its scope is board indeed,” Wilner v. Allstate Ins.

United States v. Agnello

163 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 2001

Brown, dated May 3, 1996 (“Brown App.”) .) … See also United States v.

Aventura Technologies, Inc. v. The World of Residensea II, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 29, 2019

Thomas v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States Magistrate Judge

SMS Marketing & Telecommunications, Inc. v. H.G. Telecom, Inc.

949 F. Supp. 134 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 10, 1996

Brown & Co., Inc. v. Northwest Sign Co., 718 S.W.2d 397 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.). … Brown & Co., 718 S.W.2d at 400 (“a party has no right to let an adverse claim go by default and reserve his *140 counterclaim for a time and place of his own choice.”).

United States v. Castro-Tirado

407 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 26, 1976

At the time, Castro was disembarking from Flight No. 16 originating in Los Angeles, California, with a stop at Phoenix, Arizona, where Castro had boarded. … See United States v.

Miller v. United States

365 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 23, 1973

The Millers rely on two cases, Exchange and Savings Bank of Berlin v. United States, 226 F.Supp. 56 (D.Md.1964) and Walsonavich v. … The facts in Walsonavich v.

Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund v. Steel & Duct Fabrication, Inc.

124 F. Supp. 3d 187 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 18, 2015

V, Sect, 3; Ex. F, Art. V, Sect. 6(c), Art. VII, Sect. 6; Ex..G, Art. V, Sect. 5(f), Art. VII, Sect. 6; Ex. H, Art. V, Sect. 5; Ex. I, Art. V, Sect. 6(c), Art. … Pig Newton, Inc. v. Boards of Directors of Motion Picture Indus. Pension Plan, No. 13-CV-7312, 95 F.Supp.3d 366, 375 , 2015 WL 996394, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2015) (quoting Cont’l Ins. Co. v. Atl. Cas. Ins.