Case law

Cogswell v. County of Suffolk Deputy Sheriff's Dept.

375 F. Supp. 2d 182 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 2005

Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, 834 F.2d 54, 57 (2d Cir.1987) (holding that on a motion for summary judgment, the court “cannot try issues of fact; it can only determine whether there are issues to be tried”). … Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education, 313 F.3d 768, 775 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Lerman v. Board of Elections, 232 F.3d 135 , 139-140 (2d Cir.2000)).

Ebinger Baking Co. v. Bakery & Pastry Drivers & Helpers, Local 802, of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

194 F. Supp. 617 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 1961

In fact, this very question was determined in the negative by the Supreme Court of the United States in National Labor Relations Board v. … Lakeland Bus Lines v. N. L. R. B., 3 Cir., 278 F.2d 888 ; N. L. R. B. v. McCloskey & Co., 3 Cir., 255 F.2d 68 ; N. L. R. B. v. Local 60, Carpenters, 7 Cir., 273 P.2d 699 ; N. L. R. B. v.

Donovan v. K F C Services, Inc.

547 F. Supp. 503 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 31, 1982

Such bulletins have long been accorded deference in the courts, e.g., Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161, 164 , 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944); Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, supra; Usery v. … Hinojosa, 432 F.2d 259, 266-67 (5th Cir. 1970); Marshall v. Krystal Co., 467 F.Supp. 9, 13 (E.D.Tenn. 1978); Walling v.

Principal Life Insurance Company v. Brand

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2021

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

Scalafani v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.

388 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 10, 1975

In the instant case, longshoremen employed by Universal boarded the ship on January 2 at 8:00 a. m. These longshoremen must be charged with actual or constructive knowledge of the condition of the platform at that time. … Bertino v. Polish Ocean Line, 402 F.2d 863, 866 (2d Cir. 1968).

In Re Peloton Interactive, Inc. Derivative Litigation

District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 1, 2025

.); Liu v. Foley, et al., No. 21-CV-4687 (CBA)(PK) (E.D.N.Y.); and Franchi v. Blachford, et al., No. 21- CV-6544 (CBA)(PK) (E.D.N.Y.) … The primary benefit achieved in the settlement (see “Agreement” or “Stipulation,” Ex. 1 to Declaration of Timothy Brown (“Brown Decl.”), Dkt. 46-1) is a series of corporate governance reforms (the “Enhancements,” Ex.

American Airlines, Inc. v. Town of Hempstead

272 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 1967

Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 196-197, 209-212, 230-237 , 6 L.Ed. 23 ; Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 1851, 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299, 319-320 , 13 L.Ed. 996 . … By the test applied in Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners, 1963, 374 U.S. 424, 429-430 , 83 S.Ct. 1759 , 10 L.

Favors v. Drayton

39 F. Supp. 3d 276 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 14, 2014

Hobby, 506 U.S. 103, 111-12 , 113 S.Ct. 566 , *287 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992); Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Herschlein’s legal experience is primarily in commercial litigation, with some involvement in civil rights litigation, including as co-counsel in Brown v.

Wenk v. Barnhart

340 F. Supp. 2d 313 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 6, 2004

. § 405 (g); Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 61-62 (2d Cir.1999). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla,” Richardson v. … Brown, 174 F.3d at 62-63 .

Yuen Shing Lee v. Ashcroft

216 F. Supp. 2d 51 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 15, 2002

Subsequently, Petitioner filed an interlocutory appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the BIA”), which the BIA declined to entertain. (Id., Ex. J.) … Hughes v.

Morris v. Bennett

District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 7, 2024

See McDaniel v. Brown, 558 U.S. 120, 133 (2010) (per curiam). In October 2017, petitioner and two accomplices burglarized a home, stealing $45,000 in cash. Plea Tr. 15–16 (Dkt. #4-3). … Brown, 927 F.3d 639, 656 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Rivas v.

Manshul Construction Corp. v. United States

687 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 18, 1988

United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1374 (Fed.Cir.1983) (equitable power of Claims Court limited by 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(3) to granting injunctions before contract award); see also, e.g., Brown v. … American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Califano, 571 F.2d 58, 62 (1st Cir.1978); Serra v. U.S. General Services Admin., 667 F.Supp. 1042, 1051 (S.D. *63 N.Y.1987); Consumers Electric Power Corp. v. U.S.

The Stella

243 F. 216 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 26, 1917

The Merritt & Chapman Company took the Stella into their possession at Fifty-Fourth street in the North River, and the master or captain of the Stella, who was on board at the time and was hired by the libelant, went along … Wright & Cobb v. New England Navigation Co. (D. C.) 189 Fed. 809 , affirmed 204 Fed. 762 , 125 C. C.

Schiulaz v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 8, 2021

See Balsamo v. … Brown v. Comm’r of Social Sec., No. 06-CV-3174, 2011 WL 1004696, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2011) (quoting Woodford v. Apfel, 93 F. Supp. 2d 521, 529 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)).

Moye v. Longwood Central School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 4, 2025

Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 337 (2d Cir. 2000). Discriminatory intent requires proof that “a discriminatory purpose has been a motivating factor” in the challenged action. Vill. of Arlington Heights v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

Dreher v. Rana Management, Inc.

493 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 7, 1980

See Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 409 U.S. 205 , 93 S.Ct. 364 , 34 L.Ed.2d 415 (1972); Residents Advisory Board v. … See, e. g., Resi *934 dents Advisory Board v. Rizzo, supra; Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, supra. See also Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., 610 F.2d 1032 (2d Cir. 1979).

Continental Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York, Inc.

40 F. Supp. 2d 109 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 15, 1999

All plaintiffs were Board-certified pursuant to the American 0 & P Association (“AOPA”) and the New York State 0 & P Association (“NYOPA”). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 343 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Buccellato v. City of New York

808 F. Supp. 967 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 28, 1992

The general duties of the digger gang are to board loaded and unloaded barges to attach and detach their boatlines; to remove the protective netting used to prevent refuse from falling into the sea; to fight fires on the … At trial, the parties will be able to elicit the extent of time that the digger crew members spends on board the barges and the precise perils that they face in the course of their employment.

Burns Bros. v. Erie R.

79 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 1, 1948

The starboard side of No. 77 was toward the "bulkhead; she had about 9 feet of free "board. … In a case not too dissimilar in some respects to this one (American Sugar Refining Co. v.

United States v. Matles

154 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 11, 1957

The defendant moves for a new trial of this action, mainly upon the authority of Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 , 77 S.Ct. 1007 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 . … Travelling expenses, including board and lodging, for the representative of the United States Attorney should be paid in advance.