Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

1.48s

  • Simms v. City of New York

    160 F. Supp. 2d 398 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 2001

    and a seventeen physician review board. … See Rodriguez v. Board of Educ., 620 F.2d 362 , 366 (2d Cir.1980). This Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied two of the three prongs of his prima facie case and grants Plaintiff summary judgment on those two issues.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Arkin v. Trans International Airlines, Inc.

    568 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 15, 1982

    While the Act does not set forth criteria for determining an indirect air carrier, the Civil Aeronautics Board (“CAB”) construes it to be an entity which publicly represents that it engages in air transportation. … In Mahaney v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Terjeson

    424 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 5, 1976

    In United States v. … United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 324 , 92 S.Ct. 455, 465 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971) (emphasis added). See a iso United States v. Brown, 511 F.2d 920 (2d Cir., 1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Well-Made Toy Mfg. Corp. v. Goffa International Corp.

    210 F. Supp. 2d 147 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 26, 2002

    De Acosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d 408, 413 (2d Cir.1944) (L. Hand, J., concurring). This rule does not apply merely to exact replicas; it also applies to derivatives. Cf. De Acosta v. … Defendant’s doll has brown yarn hair and deep red bows, belt, and feet, giving her an older look.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Escobar v. State University of New York/College at Old Westbury

    427 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 25, 1977

    Winnick v. Manning, 460 F.2d 545 (C.A.2 1972); Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975). … Winnick v. Manning, 460 F.2d 545 (C.A.2 1972); Edwards v. Board of Regents, 397 F.Supp. 822 (W.D.Mo.1975).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Podgurski v. Town of North Hempstead

    824 F. Supp. 2d 358 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 14, 2011

    Co. v. Richardson, 457 U.S. 668, 675 , 102 S.Ct. 2654, 2658, n. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 300 (1982)). The rules as stated in Moore v. … Werner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Valvano v. McGrath

    325 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 17, 1971

    V. … That in the event that the New York City Board of Corrections declines to proceed as requested by the court, plaintiffs may apply to the court for other means of monitoring the conditions in the institution. XII.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Broushet v. Target Corp.

    274 F.R.D. 432 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 3, 2011

    Magee v. The Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 172 F.R.D. 627, 645 (E.D.N.Y.1997) (internal citations omitted); see also Mathis v. NYNEX, 165 F.R.D. 23, 24-25 (E.D.N.Y.1996) (listing same factors). … Lattuga is a board certified and fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon specializing in spine surgery who is affiliated with the Long Island Day Op Center and the North Shore-LIJ Franklin Hospital. Dr.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Newsday, Inc.

    76 F.R.D. 9 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 22, 1976

    There a single black former employee of General Motors Corporation mounted an across-the-board attack on General Motors’ promotion policy claiming that it discriminated against all minorities regardless of position of employment … Here plaintiffs make an “across the board” attack on Newsday’s employment practices alleging that it maintains a policy of sex discrimination which pervades all departments and is applied against all female employees and

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Suffolk Airways, Inc.

    3 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 1933

    discretionary power to restrain the action, for the reason that grave injustice to the judgment creditor would result if the stay were continued;' and, thirdly, that the activities of the bankrupt corporation, its officers and board … (e), 11 USCA § 110 (e), and Moore v. Bay, 284 U. S. 4 , 52 S. Ct. 3 , 76 L. Ed. 133 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Steamtug Central States, Inc.

    9 F. Supp. 934 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 1935

    The question of jurisdiction seems to be settled by Perry v. Haines, 191 U. S. 17 , 24 S. Ct. 8 , 11, 48 L. Ed. 73 . … Code, title 46, § 183 (46 USCA § 183), provides: “The liability of the owner of any vessel, for any embezzlement, loss, or destruction, by any person, of any property, goods, or merchandise, shipped or put on board of such

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • O'Reilly v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 8, 2024

    Crowley v. Courville, 76 F.3d 47, 52 (2d Cir. 1996); see O’Connor v. … Dorsett, 732 F.3d at 160 (citing Zherka v. Amicone, 634 F.3d 642, 646 (2d Cir. 2011); Tabbaa v. Chertoff, 509 F.3d 89, 102 (2d Cir. 2007); Dougherty v. Town of N.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Principal Life Insurance Company v. Brand

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2021

    Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Singh v. Joshi

    201 F. Supp. 3d 245 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 15, 2016

    Co. v. … See Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. $293,316 in US Currency

    349 F. Supp. 2d 638 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 23, 2004

    United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 327 , 118 S.Ct. 2028 , 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998) (quoting Browning-Ferris Indus, of Vt, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S. 257, 265 , 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989)). … United States v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation

    478 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 3, 1979

    Finally, the primary defendants have all asserted third party claims against the OCC, *579 the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board, based upon their regulation of FNB. … Brown v. Thompson, 430 F.2d 1214, 1215 (5th Cir. 1971). See also Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339, 345 (E.D.Pa.1973) (no need for privilege two years after end of investigation). But cf. Black v.

    Cited 111 timesPublished
  • Kirkland v. American Title Insurance

    692 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 23, 1988

    City of Niagara Falls v. … Brown v. Tonawanda Housing, Inc., 123 A.D.2d 493 , 507 N.Y.S.2d 92 (4th Dep’t 1986). The Kirklands’ constructive fraud claim expired in 1980, six years after the alleged fraudulent act was committed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Katzenberg v. Lamport & Holt, Ltd.

    59 F.2d 739 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 28, 1932

    The libel as originally filed alleged damage to a cargo of 4,000 salted hides placed on board the steamship Bronte in the Port of Buenos Aires to be carried to the Port of New York, in accordance with the terms of a certain … Calderon v. Atlas S. S. Co., 170 U. S. 272 , 18 S. Ct. 588 , 42 L. Ed. 1033 ; The Turret Crown (C. C. A.) 297 F. 766 ; The Hadji (C. C.) 20 F. 875 .”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.

    705 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 6, 1989

    See Mintz v. State of New York, 47 A.D.2d 570 , 362 N.Y.S.2d 619 (3 Dept. 1975). See also Mesick v. State of New York, 118 A.D.2d 214 , 504 N.Y.S.2d 279 (3 Dept.1986). 23. … SGU has one representative on the 18-member board of the Hospital. SGU uses the Hospital to train its students, but does not control the Hospital.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jacques v. DiMarzio, Inc.

    200 F. Supp. 2d 151 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 6, 2002

    See, e.g., Brown v. … Congress noted that the rationale for the “regarded as” prong of the ADA was articulated by the Supreme Court in School Board of Nassau County v. Arline.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.