Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

2.04s

  • Warren v. Time Warner Cable Inc.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 28, 2020

    See Chambers v. … See MacEntee v. IBM, 783 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bowen-Hooks v. City of New York

    13 F. Supp. 3d 179 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2014

    Brown v. City of Syracuse, 673 F.3d 141, 150 (2d Cir.2012); see also Mills v. S. Connecticut State Univ., 519 Fed.Appx. 73, 75 (2d Cir.2013); Ruiz, 609 F.3d at 491-92 . … Brown, 673 F.3d at 150 (quoting Joseph v. Leavitt, 465 F.3d 87, 90 (2d Cir.2006)).

    Cited 148 timesPublished
  • The Henry Steers

    226 F. 818 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 27, 1915

    A. 362 , Shields v. The Mayor, Aldermen, etc. (D. C.) 18 Fed. 748 , and The Roma (D. … Ed. 787 , or Galveston Towing Co. v. Cuban S. S. Co., 195 Fed. 711 , 115 C. C. A. 438 , where no liability was found.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • P. Dougherty Co. v. United States

    61 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 6, 1945

    When the Dunmore returned from New London, she placed a hawser on board the Cohasset, of 200 fathoms, and then signaled to the Cohasset to heave her anchor, and in due time got under way, straight ahead until the towing hawser … Corporation v. Southern Pac. Co., 112 F.2d 297 , at page 298.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sippit Cups, Inc. v. Michael's Creations, Inc.

    180 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 22, 1960

    The leading one is Newgold v. American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co., D.C.1901, 108 F. 341 , in which the opinion was rendered by Judge Addison Brown in the Southern District of New York. … In this connection, the cases of Schwebel v. Bothe, D.C., 40 F. 478 , and Huston v. Buckeye, etc., D.C., 145 F.Supp. 600 , *62 are not helpful.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Colamarco

    320 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 24, 1970

    United States v. Lane, 284 F.2d 935 (9th Cir.1960); United States v. Gibbs, 285 F.2d 225 (9th Cir. 1960). The problem arises in connection with the application of § 5010(b) of the Act. … See United States v. Lane, supra; United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1278 , 6 L.Ed.2d 575 (1961).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Favors v. Cuomo

    285 F.R.D. 187 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 10, 2012

    (citations omitted) (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 421 (D.C.Cir.1995)). By its terms, the Speech or Debate Clause applies only to federal legislators. … Irvin, the Central District of California analyzed the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors’ assertions of privilege during depositions in response to certain questions related to the motivations behind the Board’s adoption

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • In re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation

    135 F.R.D. 39 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 6, 1991

    See Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 637 F.Supp. 910, 921 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (citing *41 Green v. Wolf Corporation, 406 F.2d 291 , 299 (2d Cir.1968)). … Ashe v. Board of Elections, 124 F.R.D. 45, 47 (E.D.N.Y.1989). The proposed class also includes the plaintiffs in a separate action against defendants in this court, Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund, L.P., v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.

    249 F.R.D. 48 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 13, 2008

    Richardson v. … Meehan, 652 F.2d at 276 (citations omitted); Brown v. Gabbidon, No. 06 Civ. 8148, 2007 WL 1423788 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.

    Cited 269 timesPublished
  • Wood v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    216 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 24, 1963

    Clothier in opposing TWA’s motion listed various facts including, that the Civil Aeronautics Board regulating and licensing TWA stated that TWA’s principal officers were in Missouri; that its Chairman of the Board was elected … See Kelly v. United States Steel Corporation, 3 Cir., 284 F.2d 850 .”

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • ARK387 Doe v. St. Barnabas Apostle

    District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 5, 2023

    Judge Brown has characterized this tactic as a “procedural device[] to scuttle plaintiffs’ opportunity to have their cases heard.” Id. … - ARK387 Doe v. St. Barnabas Apostle, et al., E.D.N.Y. No. 23-CV-4786, Nassau County Index No. 900091/2021 - Pokalsky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hartley v. Maria Regina Diocesan High School, and Congregation of the Sisters Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Scranton, Pennsylvania

    District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 5, 2023

    Judge Brown has characterized this tactic as a “procedural device[] to scuttle plaintiffs’ opportunity to have their cases heard.” Id. … - ARK387 Doe v. St. Barnabas Apostle, et al., E.D.N.Y. No. 23-CV-4786, Nassau County Index No. 900091/2021 - Pokalsky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • B.O. v. Cold Spring Harbor Central School District

    807 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 1, 2011

    Rhinebeck Central School Dist., 346 F.3d 377, 381 (2d Cir.2003) (quoting Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District, 142 F.3d 119, 122 (2d Cir.1998) and Board of Education v. … Frank G. v. Board of Educ. of Hyde Park, 459 F.3d 356, 363 (2d Cir.2006).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Siegel v. United States

    87 F. Supp. 555 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 14, 1949

    She alleges then that she appealed to the Board of Veterans Appeals, and that her appeal was rejected on the ground that plaintiff had not furnished proof of marriage. … See Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 , at page 587, 54 S.Ct. 840 , 78 L.Ed. 1434 ; Snauffer v. Stimson, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 155 F.2d 861 ; Van Horne v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • United States v. Levasseur

    618 F. Supp. 1390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 4, 1985

    Terry v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983); Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). … This motion to suppress was incident to a Franks v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Vigilanti v. Pfeiffer-Neumeyer Const. Corp.

    25 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 14, 1938

    Moody v. Megee (D.C.) 31 F.2d 117 ; Strathleven S. S. Co. v. Baulch (C.C.A.) 244 F. 412 ; Burley v. Compagnie De Navigation Francaise (C.C.A.) 194 F. 335 . … Board of Commissioners, 5 Cir., 256 F. 773 ; Massachusetts B. & Ins. Co. v. Robert E. Denike, Inc., 3 Cir., 92 F.2d 657 ; Home Ins. Co. v. Savage, 231 Mo.App. 569, 572 , 103 S.W.2d 900, 902 ; McPharlin v. Fidelity 6 D.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Teoh v. Manhasset Restaurant, LLC

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 20, 2025

    Aczel v. Labonia, 584 F.3d 52, 61 (2d Cir. 2009); see also Chitkara v. N.Y. Tel. Co., 45 F. … See, e.g., Ortiz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hendrickson v. Saint Joseph Roman Catholic Church

    District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 5, 2023

    Judge Brown has characterized this tactic as a “procedural device[] to scuttle plaintiffs’ opportunity to have their cases heard.” Id. … - ARK387 Doe v. St. Barnabas Apostle, et al., E.D.N.Y. No. 23-CV-4786, Nassau County Index No. 900091/2021 - Pokalsky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stellato v. Hofstra University

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 17, 2022

    See, e.g., Richins v Hofstra Univ., 908 F. … Brown _____ GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Migliore v. Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 17, 2022

    See, e.g., Richins v Hofstra Univ., 908 F. … Brown _____ GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.