Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
2.04s
McBeth v. Gabrielli Truck Sales, Ltd.
768 F. Supp. 2d 392 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 5, 2011
See Hines v. Overstock.com, Inc., 380 Fed.Appx. 22 (2d Cir.2010); quoting, Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Board, 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir.1992); Almonte v. … Lesch v. United States, 372 Fed.Appx. 182, 183 (2d Cir.2010), quoting, Shrader v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 256-57 (2d Cir.1995); Star Mark Management, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished150 F. Supp. 2d 508 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 18, 2001
Smith v. Board of School Comm’rs of Mobile Co., 827 F.2d 684, 692 (11th Cir.1987). … Board of Educ., 1999 WL 151702 (E.D.N.Y.1999) (dismissing § 1985(3) claim where all defendants were officers or employees of the City Board of Education acting within the scope of their employment).
Cited 5 timesPublished943 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 28, 1996
That settlement was approved by the workers’ compensation appeals board. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment based upon the doctrine of judicial estoppel was granted. … Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Autk, 731 F.Supp. 747, 750 (E.D.La.1990) (The doctrine applies equally to positions taken in quasi-judicial administrative proceedings as it does in courts of law); Brown v. Nat’l R.R.
Cited 8 timesPublished25 F.R.D. 225 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 25, 1960
United States v. Brown, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1959, 179 F.Supp. 893 ; United States v. Lupino, D.C.D.Minn.1958, 171 F.Supp. 648 ; United States v. … McKenna, D.C.D.Minn.1954, 126 F.Supp. 831 , affirmed 8 Cir., 1956, 232 F.2d 431 ; United States v. Carb, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1954, 17 F.R.D. 242 ; United States v. Smith, D.C.W.D.Mo.1954, 16 F.R.D. 372 ; United States v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedZuckerman v. Volume Services America, Inc.
304 F. Supp. 2d 365 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 26, 2004
See Avco Corp. v. … MTA Metro-North Railroad, 952 F.Supp. 177, 180-81 (S.D.N.Y.1997), as well as claims of negligence and negligent supervision, see Brown v. National Football League, 219 F.Supp.2d 372, 389-90 (S.D.N.Y.2002). B.
Cited 7 timesPublished598 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 1984
Defendants were members of the Board of Regents, the State Commissioner on Education and the Executive Secretary of the New York State Board of Pharmacies. … Dist. v.
Cited 21 timesPublished509 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 30, 2007
Terry v. Ohio Under Terry v. … See U.S. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedCenteno v. The County Of Nassau
District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 27, 2025
On November 2, 2023, the plaintiff commenced a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Board of Education of Hicksville, USFD (“Board”), Board members and trustees, and the superintendent of schools. Centeno v. … (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Murphy v. Rodriguez, No. 23-CV-6998, 2025 WL 623694, at *1 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOlmsted v. Pruco Life Ins. Co. of New Jersey
134 F. Supp. 2d 508 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 30, 2000
June 11, 1996) (§§ 36(a), 34(b)); Langner v. Brown, 913 F.Supp. 260 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (§§ 10(a), 36(b), 17(a), 17(d)); Blatt v. … Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 373 (1st Cir. 1971) (§ 36) (noting that the defendants did not contest the issue); Brown v.
Cited 5 timesPublished5055 Northern Boulevard LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Old Brookville
District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 6, 2020
See Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 (1979). … v. State, 84 N.Y.S.3d 633, 633 (N.Y. App.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBallan v. Wilfred American Educational Corp.
720 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 30, 1989
The Chairman of the Board’s letter to shareholders in that report, dated March 13, 1987, stated: The Company’s administration of student financial aid is being investigated. … See generally Randy Knitwear v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedFeit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation
332 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 1971
Ratner v. … See Escott v.
Criticized by Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 570 F.2d 38 (1978)Cited 76 timesPublished220 F. Supp. 3d 264 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 12, 2016
Brown, 52 F.3d 415 (2d Cir. 1995); United States v. Spencer, 955 F.2d 814 (2d Cir. 1992); United States v. Westcott, 159 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 1998); United States v. Galicia-Delgado, 130 F.3d 518 (2d Cir. 1997). … As explained above, the Second Circuit has held that “authority interpreting one phrase frequently is found to be persuasive in interpreting the other phrase,” United States v. *273 Brown, 514 F.3d 256, 268 (2d Cir. 2008)
Cited 5 timesPublishedDental Precision Shoulder, Inc. v. L. D. Caulk Co.
7 F.R.D. 203 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 1947
I fully agree with Judge Bright (Hoffman v. … Railroad Labor Board, 1925, 268 U.S. 619 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 ) and that, among other things, objections on the score of improper venue are personal to the defendant affected. Camp v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.
589 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 1984
First National Bank of Omaha, 422 F.Supp. 1346 (D.Minn.1976); Committee of Interns & Residents v. New York State Labor Relations Board, 420 F.Supp. 826 , (S.D.N.Y.1976); Johnson v. … First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Detroit, 418 F.Supp. 1106 (E.D.Mich.1976); State of New York v. Local 115 Joint Board, Nursing Home & Hospital Employees Div., 412 F.Supp. 720 (E.D.N.Y.1976); Lowe v.
Cited 6 timesPublished972 F. Supp. 2d 308 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 20, 2013
See LaFleur v. … June 11, 2008) (quoting United States v. Brown, 988 F.2d 658, 663 (6th Cir.1993)) (noting that “the burden in civil actions has traditionally been placed on the plaintiff by a preponderance of the evidence.”).
Cited 9 timesPublished607 F. Supp. 2d 437 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 20, 2009
Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603-04 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Zieper v. Metzinger, 474 F.3d 60, 65-66 (2d Cir.2007). … Stanley v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Apr 22, 2022
In this Circuit, courts “routinely approve requests to post notice on employee bulletin boards and in other common areas, even when potential members will also be notified by mail, because it maximizes potential plaintiffs … Defendants assert that plaintiffs were paid for all hours worked, [of which] [d]efendants were aware,” and (2) “[d]efendant Jack Brown denies that he is an employer under the FLSA.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. New York · May 19, 2025
Brown, U.S.D.J. is Defendant Toulon’s Motion for Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 22.) … Indeed, this District and in particular, Judge Brown has afforded pro se litigants, including Plaintiff, with ample opportunities to cure pleading deficiencies. See Scelza v. Dep't of Suffolk Cnty.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna