Case law

In re Hutchinson

28 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 31, 1938

Pendleton v. Benner Line, 246 U.S. 353 -356, 38 S.Ct. 330 , 62 L.Ed. 770 . … Richardson v. Harmon, 222 U.S. 96 , 32 S.Ct. 27 , 56 L.Ed. 110 ; Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co., 248 U.S. 139 , 39 S.Ct. 53 , 63 L.Ed. 170 , 1 A.L.R. 1522 ; Capitol Transp. Co. v.

Haji v. Miller

584 F. Supp. 2d 498 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 24, 2008

v. … Brown v.

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 27, 2025

, Planning Board, and Site and Architectural Board (“SARB”). … Block v.

Temperino v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 28, 2023

Brown GARY R. … BROWN United States District Judge 3

Moskowitz v. Great Neck Union Free School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 31, 2021

the Great Neck Union Free School District (the “Board”), Dana Slackman, Dr. … See Johnson v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc., No. 17-cv-00056 (AMD)(JO), 2017 WL 4402453, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2017) (citing Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v.

Marriott In-Flite Services, A Division of Marriott Corp. v. Local 504, Air Transport Division, Transport Workers of America

461 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 22, 1978

Pursuant to authority which was given to its Negotiating Committee at an Executive Board meeting in May, 1973 and with the authorization of TWU, the defendant Local struck KLM on July 1, 1973. … The meaning of “doing business” in this provision was clarified by Judge Rifkind in the Ebasco case, Douds v.

Centro De La Comunidad His-pana De Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster Bay

128 F. Supp. 3d 597 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 3, 2015

The Town of Oyster Bay held a Town Board meeting on March 31, 2009. … French, 691 F.3d 193, 205 (2d Cir.2012) (quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 252 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ), or “some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts,” Brown v.

LaBarbera v. J.E.T. Resources, Inc.

396 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 4, 2005

In addition, when there is a fee application containing excessive hours, it is within the discretion of the district court to make an across the board percentage reduction. … Board of Education of City of Rochester, 295 F.Supp.2d 282 (W.D.N.Y.2003) (10% reduction in *353 hours); Sabatini v.

O'Brien v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 22, 2024

T.B. v. Colvin, 523 F. App’x 58, 59 (2d Cir. 2013)). … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge 3

United States v. Toussie

280 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 30, 1967

See Fogel v. … Reliance is placed of course, on Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1965, 382 U.S. 70 , 86 S.Ct. 194 , 15 L.Ed.2d 165 , and on the now doubtful status of United States v.

Lloyd v. Munson S. S. Lines

1 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 29, 1932

John, where an additional cargo of potatoes was placed on board by Dyal, and she thereafter reached Cuba without further incident. … Wood v. Hubbard (C. C. A.) 62 F. 753 ; Nicolini v. Lutcher (C. C. A.) 108 F. 550 .

America's Best Family Showplace Corp. v. City of New York

530 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 19, 1982

See e.g., McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668, 672 , 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1435-36 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). Indeed, in Mitchum v. … See, e.g., Pike v. Bruce Church Inc., 397 U.S. 137, 139 , 90 S.Ct. 844, 845 , 25 L.Ed.2d 174 (1970); Griffin v. School Board of Prince Edward County, 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964).

Stevenson v. Town of Oyster Bay

433 F. Supp. 2d 263 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 23, 2006

Diesel v. Town of Leunsboro, 232 F.3d 92 , 103 (2d *267 Cir.2000) (citation omitted); Crowley v. Courville, 76 F.3d 47 , 52-53 (2d Cir.1996); LaTrieste Restaurant & Cabaret v. … Shea Co., Inc. v.

Hall v. SCCF Warden

District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 25, 2021

Sosa v. Bustos, No. 17-CV- 0417(ER), 2020 WL 1940550, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2020) (citing Barrett v. City of Newburgh, 720 F. … See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Idaho

12 F. Cas. 1155 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 15, 1870

I am aware that in the English admiralty the old rule, in regard to intervention in suits in rem, has been relaxed (see The Regina Del Mare, Brown. & L. 315; The Innisfalien, 16 Law T. [N. S.] 71; Williams & B. Adm. … S. v. 422 Casks of Wine, 1 Pet. [26 U. S.] 547. My opinion therefore, is, that the application of Porter to be permitted to defend in this action must be denied.

In re Savage Mills, Inc.

170 F. Supp. 559 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 16, 1959

Judge Goddard, in dismissing the petition to review said order, after citing Oswego Starch Factory v. Dolloway, 21 N.Y. 449 , and Ajax Rubber Company, Inc. v. J. P. … This is established by such cases as Western Transportation Co. v. Scheu, 19 N.Y. 408 ; Carvel Court Realty Co. Inc. v. Jonas, 195 App.Div. 662 , 186 N.Y.S. 802 ; Oswego Starch Factory v.

United States v. Giagoudakis

693 F. Supp. 1417 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 1987

Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (plurality opinion of Rehnquist, J) (quoting United States v. … North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369 , 99 S.Ct. 1755 , 60 L.Ed.2d 286 (1979); United States v. Rubio, 709 F.2d 146, 152 (2d Cir.1983); United States v.

CIT Bank N.A. v. Gordon

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 22, 2019

.”); Pall Corp. v. … Thus, Judge Brown properly denied the Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees, without prejudice to renewal. See Mack Fin. Servs. v. Poczatek, No. 10-CV-3799, 2011 WL 4628695, at *10 (E.D.N.Y.

Waterman v. United States

199 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 16, 1961

She then pursued and exhausted her administrative remedies, which culminated in the affirmance by the Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board of the decisions below, which held that she had failed to establish “wage loss”. … See Blanc v. United States, 2 Cir., 244 F.2d 708 , cert, denied 355 U.S. 874 , 78 S.Ct. 126 , 2 L.Ed.2d 79 . The motion to dismiss the complaint is granted. Settle order on notice.

American Bridge Co. v. the Gloria O

98 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 18, 1951

& Pacific Elevator Co. v. … That view, however, did not find acceptance in the later cases of Cleveland T. & V. R. Co. v. Cleveland Steamship Co., 208 U.S. 316 , 28 S.Ct. 414 , 52 L.Ed. 508 ; Martin v.