Case law

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rappaport, Hertz, Cherson & Rosenthal, P.C.

448 F. Supp. 2d 458 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 16, 2006

Kidder Peabody & Co., 81 N.Y.2d 623, 630-31 , 619 N.E.2d 998 , 601 N.Y.S.2d 686 (1993), or local law, Rice v. Brown Bros. Harriman & Co., No. 96 Civ. 6326, 1997 WL 129396 , at *1, 1997 U.S. Dist. … Irwin Home Equity Corp., 300 F.3d 88 (1st Cir.2002); Blair v. Scott Specialty Gases, 283 F.3d 595, 610 (3d Cir.2002); Primerica Life Ins. Co. v. Brown, 304 F.3d 469 , 471 n. 6 (5th Cir.2002); Gannon v.

Burroughs v. Northern Telecom, Inc.

142 F.R.D. 584 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 2, 1992

Co. v. R.H. … See Lora v.

New York State Ass'n of Realtors, Inc. v. Shaffer

833 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 1993

Accordingly, the first prong of the Central Hudson test is satisfied (See Greater Baltimore Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Baltimore County, 752 F.Supp. 193, 197 [D.Md.1990]). … Within those bounds, we leave it to government decision makers to judge what manner of regulation may best be employed” (Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v.

Saldin v. Colvin

34 F. Supp. 3d 271 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2014

See 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Jasinski v. Barnhart, 341 F.3d 182, 184 (2d Cir.2003); Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 61-62 (2d Cir.1999); Tejada v. *282 Apfel, 167 F.3d 770, 773 (2d Cir.1999). … Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1999). C. As to Whether the ALJ’s Finding is Supported by Substantial Evidence The Court finds that the ALJ’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence.

O'Donnell Transp. Co. v. Seaboard Coal Co.

73 F. Supp. 402 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 15, 1947

The record is barren as to how much of that water, if any, was attributable to any failure of the gasoline or the hand pump which were on board the barge. … See Seaboard Sand & Gravel Corporation v. James Hughes, Inc., et al., D.C., 56 F.Supp. 468 ; Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., Inc., v. Barge Martin P. Horan, 1935 A.M.C. 1143 ; Kelly v.

Alvarez v. United States

District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 4, 2024

In Pommells v. … Brown GARY R. BROWN United States District Judge

Craig v. The City of New York

District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 30, 2022

Brown v. Whitley, No. 21-CV-2933 (AMD)(CLP), 2022 WL 1504757, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 22, 2022); see Kiarie, 473 F. … as a COBA Annuity Fund Trustee; his appointment was ratified by a majority of the Board.”

Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin

170 F.R.D. 93 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 9, 1996

Herdman v. … In Jones v.

PGC Property, LLC v. Wainscott/Sagaponack Property Owners, Inc.

250 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 13, 2003

On September 6, 2000, PGC submitted an application to the Southhampton Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) seeking permission for certain limited expansion of the PGC facility. … Gallo v. Prudential Residential Servs. Ltd., 22 F.3d 1219, 1224 (2d Cir.1994); see Donahue v.

Mondella

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 15, 2025

Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011). … See Paolitto v. John Brown E. & C., Inc., 151 F.3d 60, 64 (2d Cir. 1998) (“[T]he fact that evidence is within an exception to the hearsay rule does not by itself make it admissible per se.”).

Minsky v. Apfel

65 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 17, 1999

Standard of Review This Court reviews challenges to the Commissioner’s decisions to determine whether they are supported by substantial *134 evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) (1994); Brown v. … Substantial evidence means “ ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d at 62 -63 (citing Richardson v.

Cadillac v. Cadillac

58 F.R.D. 534 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 1973

Compare Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 448 F.2d 442 (2 Cir. 1971); Reiver v. Photo Motion Corp., 325 F.Supp. 214 (E.D.Pa. 1971); cf. Hirshfield v. Briskin, 447 F. *536 2d 694, 696-697 (7 Cir. 1971). … Hirshfield v. Briskin, swpra 447 F.2d at 697 ; Tryforos v. Icarian Development Co., S.A., 47 F.R.D. 191 (N.D.111.1969).

The Lake Ellendale

53 F.2d 415 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 15, 1931

Gidian, were also on board of the dredge at the same time, and were injured as a result of the same occurrence. … Claimant based the application to vacate this proceeding upon the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the ease of Langnes v. Green, decided February 24, 1931, which has been referred to as The Aloha, 282 U.

Perks v. Town of Huntington

96 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 23, 2000

During this time, Defendant served as the Town Board’s liaison to the Town’s Oil Spill Response Board, As liaison, Defendant supervised Plaintiff and made decisions affecting the terms and conditions of his employment. … As noted above, Matthews took no action on this matter, but rather referred the matter to the Town Board.

Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 19, 2020

Perry Drucker, a board-certified physician. (Id. at 5.) Dr. … Balodis v. Leavitt, 704 F. Supp. 2d 255, 262 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) (quoting Brown v. Apfel, 174 F.3d 59, 62 (2d Cir. 1999) (alterations in original)).

Howard v. Koch

575 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 11, 1982

See also Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). The Second Circuit has addressed this issue most recently in Pauk v. … Board of Trustees of the City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856 (2d Cir.1981).

Adams v. Standard Folding Trays Corp.

151 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 21, 1957

The other rail is formed by a portion of *3 board integrally connected with the opposite side wall.” … The plaintiffs’ patent has not been adjudicated, nor is it shown to have been acquiesced in, thus resembling the situation revealed in Stewart Stamping Corp. v. Westchester, etc., D.C., 119 F.

Tewksbury v. Dowling

169 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 17, 2001

Brown v. C. Volante Corp., 194 F.3d 351, 354 (2nd Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1004 , 120 S.Ct. 1268 , 146 L.Ed.2d 218 (2000). … Rodriguez v.

Laverpool v. New York City Transit Authority

760 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 1991

A constitutional conspiracy claim must be pled with at least some degree of particularity (see Bertucci v. Brown, 663 F.Supp. 447, 454 [E.D.N.Y.1987]; see also Neustein v. … Board of Managers of Continental Towers Condominium, 848 F.2d 24, 25 [2d Cir.1988] [citations omitted]).

Nasser v. CSX LINES, LLC.

191 F. Supp. 2d 307 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 2002

Union members secure employment aboard vessels by amassing in the “hiring hall” when a “job is put ‘on the board’ for bids.” Defendant’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, at 3. … Brown v. OMI Corp., 1994 WL 39026 *4 (S.D.N.Y. Feb.9, 1994) (citations omitted); see also Lewis, 531 U.S. at 441 , 121 S.Ct. 993 ; Mooney v.