Case law

In re Scarpa

87 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 13, 1949

On June 28, 1943 he executed and filed with his local draft board a statement of his personal history. Therein it appears-that he objected to service in the land or naval forces of the United States. … I see nothing in the foregoing, therefore, to justify a denial of the petition for citizenship, particularly in the light of Girouard v.

United States v. Certain Lands in Brooklyn

44 F. Supp. 830 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 29, 1942

See, also, Towsley v. McDonald, 32 Barb., N.Y., 604; Moyer v. Hinman, 13 N.Y. 180 ; Trenton Banking Co. v. Duncan, 86 N.Y. 221 , at page 227. In Brown v. … See Thomas v. Kelsey, 30 Barb., N.Y., 268; Flagler v. Malloy, 56 Hun 643 , 9 N.Y.S. 573 ; Obermeyer & Liebmann v. Jung, 51 App.Div. 247 , 64 N.Y.S. 959 ; Russell v.

In re Ghazal

163 F. 602 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 14, 1908

S. v. Queen (D. C.) 105 Fed. 269 ; 24 Opin. Atty. Gen. 61. … In Williams v. Heard, 140 U. S. 529 , 11 Sup. Ct. 885, 35 L.

Holmes v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International

745 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 12, 2010

See Sira v. … [is] limited [to] review of the decisions of the Adjustment Board.”).

Able v. United States

847 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 4, 1994

See also Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348 , 100 S.Ct. 594 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980) (upholding Air Force regulation requiring Air Force members to obtain command approval before circulating petitions on base); Greer v. … The Supreme Court in Brown v.

United States v. Levasseur

619 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 7, 1985

Franks v. … DiGiangiemo v.

Dole v. Federation of Postal Police Officers, Inc.

744 F. Supp. 413 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 29, 1990

Hodgson v. … The composition of the Trial Board is defined in the constitution.

Mazza v. Bratton

108 F. Supp. 2d 167 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2000

Stone v. … Durant v.

Deutsch Ex Rel. Estate of Deutsch v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

768 F. Supp. 2d 420 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 8, 2011

Co. v. … United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 400 (2d Cir.1985).

Marshak v. Reed

199 F.R.D. 110 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 5, 2001

Hirschfeld v. Board of Elections, 984 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir.1993); LNC Investments, Inc. v. Republic of Nicaragua, 2000 WL 729216 , at *1 (S.D.N.Y.2000). 1. Reed’s claims of irreparable injury are speculative.

Guzzello v. Venteau

789 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 1992

Under Nevada law, a judgment on the merits of an issue bars further consideration of that issue (Brown v. Capanna, 105 Nev. 665 , 782 P.2d 1299, 1301 [1989]). … In Brown v.

Harry

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 24, 2026

Brown v. City of New York, No. 21-cv-04632, 2023 WL 2908661, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2023) (quoting T.Y. v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., 584 F.3d 412, 418 (2d. Cir. 2009)) (emphasis added); see also Vasquez v. … (citing Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co, Inc., 258 F.3d 62, 74 (2d Cir. 2001))); Brown, 2023 WL 2908661, at *5 (conducting review of the record where a pro se litigant failed to file a 56.1 counterstatement).

Romano

District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 2026

Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44, 54 (1998), and requires inquiry into whether the Town Board members’ actions as pleaded were legislative in function, see Harhay v. … The First Amendment protects conduct such as “attend[ing] public meetings and hearings of the Board of Trustees, the Planning Board and the ZBA.” Id. at 195; see also Abraham v.

Lauro v. Pennsylvania R.

64 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 30, 1945

Y.1894, 61 F. 692 , Judge Brown held that a bailee is liable for salvage to the owner, under circumstances where the vessel broke adrift as the result ol the bailee’s negligence. … In Dailey v. City of New York, D.C., S.D. N.Y.1902, 119 F. 1005 , the owner, in a suit for salvage, was permitted to bring in parties who, it was claimed, negligently caused the vessel to break adrift.

Selig v. Richardson

379 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 24, 1974

On April 28, 1969, the Board of Veterans Appeals issued a decision finding *598 that there was enough doubt about the matter to conclude that plaintiff’s areteriosclerotic heart disease, although only first diagnosed in 1967 … And while not binding here, the Board of Veterans Appeals’ similar conclusion is not to be ignored. Nor do the normal electrocardiograms present much, if any, contrary evidence.

United States v. Capitol Meats, Inc.

66 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 12, 1946

Whenever made, it is required to be tested for good faith, and also there must appear a reasonable and substantial excuse for failure to seek relief by way of protest to the Administrator and the board of review, according … Distilling Co. v. United States, 153 F.2d 353 , at page 357 et seq. Argument is next made' to demonstrate why the Emergency Court of Appeals would probably accord to the defendants the relief which now they seek.

The Millinocket

266 F. 392 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 22, 1920

GARVIN, District Judge. [1] This libel was filed against the Millinocket to recover for coal delivered to and placed on board that steamship October 14, 1919. Delivery and price are not in dispute. … Coyle v. North America S. S. Corp. (C. C.

Correa v. Mana Products, Inc.

550 F. Supp. 2d 319 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 17, 2008

Thus, “an employment discrimination plaintiff faced with a properly supported summary judgment motion must ‘do more than simply show there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.’ ” Brown v. … See, e.g., Byrnie v.

Spinner v. Verbridge

125 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 29, 2000

v. … See Phass v.

New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation

280 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 29, 2003

Before this Court is a motion brought by plaintiffs State of New York, New York State Racing and Wagering Board, and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (collectively “the State” or “Plaintiffs”) as against … Casino Corp. v.