Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

1.28s

  • Brinson v. New York City Transit Authority

    60 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 1999

    According to the letter, before boarding the bus, Mr. … In Umpierre v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. County of Nassau

    188 F.R.D. 187 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 23, 1999

    . § 3601 et seq., against the County of Nassau and the Nassau County Board of Assessors, seeking “to redress the residential property tax assessment and collection system” which discriminates based on race and national origin … See Hachette Distribution v. Hudson County News Company, Inc., 136 F.R.D. 356, 358 (E.D.N.Y.1991) (Spatt, J.). Secondly, the motion, if successful, is dispositive of the entire action. See Rivera v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Gleitsman v. Monarch Sanitary Products, Inc.

    26 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 23, 1939

    MacClemmy v. Gilbert Corset Co., 2 Cir., 211 F. 73 ; Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co. et. al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City, 4 Cir., 139 F. 312 . … hamper, which fiber board rests upon the base of the hamper, and supports the top of the hamper and the cover of the hamper.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Place

    498 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 1980

    Carrying two black suitcases and a brown handbag, defendant had arrived on the line directly behind Mr. … See also, Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975); United States v. Vasquez, supra; United States v.

    Reversed by United States v. Raymond J. Place, 660 F.2d 44 (1981)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bumagin

    136 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2015

    V. … United States v. Brown, 606 F.Supp.2d 306, 311-12 (E.D.N.Y.2009) (Matsumoto, J.) (internal quotation -marks,' brackets,- and citations omitted). B. Application 1.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Van Brode Milling Co. v. Kravex Manufacturing Corp.

    21 F.R.D. 246 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 25, 1957

    Kress & Company v. Aghnides, 4 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 718, 721 . … Jacob Elishewitz & Sons, Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co., 2 Cir., 1930, 40 F.2d 434 ; Frank v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Trent v. Peddycoart

    District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 3, 2024

    Accordingly, Judge Brown dismissed the complaint with prejudice. … P. 72; Wagner & Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd & Carwile, P.C., 596 F.3d 84, 92 (2d Cir. 2010); Beverly v. Walker, 118 F.3d 900, 902 (2d Cir. 1997); Savoie v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Lee

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2020

    V. … See Sowell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Zucker v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2022

    T.B. v. 1 In this case, plaintiff’s counsel’s contention statement was as counsel noted, exactly the same as its memorandum of law. … Brown GARY R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Patent Royalties Corp. v. Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc.

    15 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 12, 1936

    The patent to Koppelman & Cooper was the subject of litigation in Holed-Tite Packing, Inc., v. Mapes et al. (D.C.) 11 F.(2d) 787 , and claims 1 to 6, inclusive, and 8 to 10, inclusive, were held valid and infringed. … If board of sufficient thickness were used to permit the formation of holders thereon without rupturing or unduly weakening the material, the objection first noted would still be present, and the weight of the-board and its

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King v. Hasty

    154 F. Supp. 2d 396 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 21, 2001

    The NOA informed King that the decision was appealable to the National Appeals Board pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 2.26 . … Perrill, 919 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.1990)), petitioner here fails to make any showing that an appeal to the National Appeals Board was “unavailable or inadequate.” Id.; see also Russo v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Johnson

    District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 6, 2023

    Brown v. Smith, No. 09-CV-4522, 2012 WL 511581, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2012) (quoting Kennedy v. Adamo, No. 02-CV-1776, 2006 WL 3704784, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 1, 2006) (alterations omitted)). … Sasmor v. Powell, No. 11-CV- 4645, 2015 WL 5458020, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2015) (quoting Batista v. Walker, No. 94- CV-2826, 1995 WL 453299, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. July 31, 1995)); Urena v. New York, 160 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cleary Bros. v. Boston Insurance

    177 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 25, 1959

    Sprague, Inc., laden at Pier 18, C.R.N.J. on July 24, 1951 to the Board of Transportation of the City of New York. The carrying barge John J. … The Sydfold, 2 Cir., 86 F.2d 611, 612 ; Redman v. United States, 2 Cir., 176 F. 2d 713 , 1949 A.M.C. 1518 ; Redman v. United Fruit Co., 2 Cir., 185 F.2d 553 , 1951 A.M.C. 63 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dr. Gerald R. Finkel, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry v. Allstate Electric Corp.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 2, 2020

    Finkel, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry, filed a motion seeking confirmation of an arbitration award against respondent, Allstate Electric Corp., as well as reimbursement for attorneys … Sik Gaek, Inc. v. Yogi’s II, Inc., No. 10-CV-4077 (ARR) (VVP), 2014 WL 12828173, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 28, 2014) (quoting Bowens v. Atl. Maint. Corp., 546 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Epter v. New York City Transit Authority

    127 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 31, 2001

    EEOC v. Massachusetts, 460 U.S. at 70 . … Thus, the TA would have no more a justification to impose an across-the-board gender classification requiring EKG testing for all men seeking promotion to Station Supervisor, Level I as it did to creaLe an across-the-board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Moscarelli v. Stamm

    288 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 22, 1968

    Case Company v. Borak, supra; Remar v. Clayton Securities Corporation, 81 F.Supp. 1014 (D.Mass.1949); Reader v. Hirsch & Co., 197 F.Supp. 111 (S.D.N.Y.1961); Lorenz v. … Aschkar & Co. v.

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • Gotkin v. Miller

    379 F. Supp. 859 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 24, 1974

    As the Supreme Court in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), articulated : “Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. … (iii) the firearms control board of the city of New York, when such board has requested information with regard to a named person, providing such request is accompanied by a certification from such board that the named person

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Marine Electric Railway Products Division, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority (In re Marine Electric Railway Products Division, Inc.)

    29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,296 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 1982

    See also Harran Transportation Co., Inc. v. Board of Education, 71 Misc.2d 139 , 335 N.Y. S.2d 465 (Sup.Ct., Nassau County 1972). … See, e.g., Kayfield Construction Corp. v. Morris, supra; Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Board, Town of Brighton, 1 N.Y.2d 508 , 154 N.Y.S.2d 849 , 136 N.E.2d 827 (1956).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Caputo v. Copiague Union Free School District

    218 F. Supp. 3d 186 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 4, 2016

    The notice of claim explicitly named the District (“Copiague Public Schools” and the “Board of Education”). … It is well settled that compliance with Education Law § 3813 is a condition precedent to commencement of a tort action against a school board, its members or employees. P.J. Panzeca, Inc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kirkland v. Security Captain Cruz 1197

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2025

    See Preiser v. … Queens County District Attorney, No. 18-CV-5373 (MKB), 2020 WL 837357, at *4 (Feb. 20, 2020) (citing Geer v. Brown, No. 14-CV-6172 (CBA) (LB), 2015 WL 4042166, at *4 (E.D.N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.