Case law

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lowe

556 F. Supp. 1359 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 1, 1983

The Supreme Court has defined commercial speech as “speech which ‘does no more than propose a commercial transaction,’ ” Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. … Rather than adopt an interpretation that “might collide with the guarantees of the First Amendment,” National Labor Relations Board v.

Adwar Casting Co. v. Star Gems Inc.

342 F. Supp. 3d 297 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 18, 2018

Mali v. British Airways , 2018 WL 3329858 , at *5 (S.D.N.Y., July 6, 2018) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Ops. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 927, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011) ). … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see Powell v.

Bellomo v. United Arab Shipping Co.(SAG)

863 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 21, 1994

Moreover, Plaintiff testified that when he boarded the ship at approximately 8:10 AM, the deck was covered with freshly fallen snow. (Id. at 31.) … See Ercole v.

Everson v. New York City Transit Authority

216 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 12, 2002

(citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam)). … V.

Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders

102 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 30, 1952

Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. … Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co., 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 129 ), including legal *343 expenses of this proceeding. Aladdin Mfg. Co. v. Mantle Lamp Co. of America, 7 Cir., 116 F.2d 708 , at page 717. Settle order.

Brinson v. New York City Transit Authority

60 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 1999

According to the letter, before boarding the bus, Mr. … In Umpierre v.

Gleitsman v. Monarch Sanitary Products, Inc.

26 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 23, 1939

MacClemmy v. Gilbert Corset Co., 2 Cir., 211 F. 73 ; Imperial Bottle Cap & Machine Co. et. al. v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City, 4 Cir., 139 F. 312 . … hamper, which fiber board rests upon the base of the hamper, and supports the top of the hamper and the cover of the hamper.

Fn v. Bd. of Educ. Sachem Cent. School Dist.

894 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 10, 1995

The plaintiffs cite M.P. by D.P. v. Governing Board of Grossmont Union High School Dist., 858 F.Supp. 1044 (S.D.Cal.1994) and Hacienda La Puente School District of Los Angeles v. … See Cronin v. *613 Board of Educ., 689 F.Supp. 197 , 200-203 (S.D.N.Y.1988).

Atwater v. Ewing

86 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 20, 1949

In this situation, the Referee and the Appeals counsel for the Social Security Board, with some natural regrets, nevertheless have found and decided that in the absence of an annulment of the Atwater marriage by a judgment … On the other hand, the defendant relies somewhat heavily on In re Crook’s Estate, 140 Misc. 721 , 252 N.Y.S. 373 , and Anonymous v.

United States v. Bumagin

136 F. Supp. 3d 361 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2015

V. … United States v. Brown, 606 F.Supp.2d 306, 311-12 (E.D.N.Y.2009) (Matsumoto, J.) (internal quotation -marks,' brackets,- and citations omitted). B. Application 1.

Van Brode Milling Co. v. Kravex Manufacturing Corp.

21 F.R.D. 246 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 25, 1957

Kress & Company v. Aghnides, 4 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 718, 721 . … Jacob Elishewitz & Sons, Co. v. Bronston Bros. & Co., 2 Cir., 1930, 40 F.2d 434 ; Frank v.

Zucker v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2022

T.B. v. 1 In this case, plaintiff’s counsel’s contention statement was as counsel noted, exactly the same as its memorandum of law. … Brown GARY R.

United States v. Place

498 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 1980

Carrying two black suitcases and a brown handbag, defendant had arrived on the line directly behind Mr. … See also, Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975); United States v. Vasquez, supra; United States v.

Nelson v. Phoenix Chemical Works

17 F. Cas. 1336 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 15, 1873

The proposition, that it is the duty of a wharfinger to give information gs to inequalities in the surface of the bottom, when that is material to the safety of a vessel about to moor at his wharf, — Sawyer v. … But it is insisted that inasmuch as the evidence shows that the wharfinger, who was the consignee of the cargo on board this vessel, directed the master to place his vessel in the berth she took, without informing him that

O'Brien Bros. v. City of New York

36 F.2d 102 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 2, 1928

Libelant’s scow was damaged by a fire which started under a dumping board, on a pier, and was later communicated to the scow. … Plumb v. Richmond Light Co., 233 N. Y. 285 , particularly at page *103 287, 135 N. E. 504, 505 , 25 A. L. R. 685. This explanation has been given. It appears that a competent watchman was employed and was there.

U.S. Bank National Association v. Nanan

District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 14, 2022

See Summons Returned Executed for the New York City Environmental Control Board (docketed on Oct. 12, 2020) at 1, DE #8. The Control Board never appeared in this action. … Mem. at 21, DE #23, the Selva Affidavit is in no way “analogous” to the affidavit of the plaintiff’s asset manager in Miss Jones LLC v. Brown, 17 Civ. 898 (NGG)(VMS), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148140, at *21 (E.D.N.Y.

Anderson v. Lee

District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2020

V. … See Sowell v.

Patent Royalties Corp. v. Land O'Lakes Creameries, Inc.

15 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 12, 1936

The patent to Koppelman & Cooper was the subject of litigation in Holed-Tite Packing, Inc., v. Mapes et al. (D.C.) 11 F.(2d) 787 , and claims 1 to 6, inclusive, and 8 to 10, inclusive, were held valid and infringed. … If board of sufficient thickness were used to permit the formation of holders thereon without rupturing or unduly weakening the material, the objection first noted would still be present, and the weight of the-board and its

Wharton v. Roth

263 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 22, 1964

The defendants Smith and Rockwell appear not to have attended any meetings of the TCA board of directors held in this District. *924 “ * * * the complaint sufficiently alleges their connection with and participation in the … See Thiele v. Shields, 131 F.Supp. 416, 420 (S.D.N.Y.1955)."

King v. Hasty

154 F. Supp. 2d 396 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 21, 2001

The NOA informed King that the decision was appealable to the National Appeals Board pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 2.26 . … Perrill, 919 F.2d 1, 2 (2d Cir.1990)), petitioner here fails to make any showing that an appeal to the National Appeals Board was “unavailable or inadequate.” Id.; see also Russo v.