Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

1.51s

  • Crider v. Eisenschmidt

    153 F. Supp. 2d 214 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 1, 2001

    Brown v. Kuhlmann, 142 F.3d 529, 537 (2d Cir.1998) (citation omitted); see Bobb v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Mahler

    321 F. Supp. 3d 392 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 2018

    Any time we see a rec[i]ssion or a cold return of premium, there [is] a [one] hundred percent chargeback ... that's across the board all our products."). 29. … . *401 Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Constr. Corp. , 41 N.Y. 2d 397 , 399, 393 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 361 N.E.2d 999 (1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.

    212 F. 192 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 6, 1914

    Ed. 939 , American Road Machine Co. v. Pennock & Sharp Co., 164 U. S. 26 , 17 Sup. Ct. 1, 41 L. Ed. 337 , and Marchand v. Emken, supra). … Leeds & Catlin v. Victor Talking Machine Co., supra; Hohman Co. v. Tagliabue Co. (C. C.) 175 Fed. 87 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.

    246 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 5, 1965

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 1962, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 . … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 1962, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 ; Tampa Elec. Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., supra.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Samuel Kennedy, and Kennedy Technology MK; Samuel Kennedy v. Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC and Maryland Partnership for Prevention, Inc.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 22, 2026

    Fitzpatrick and her co-counsel, Peter Brown (“Brown”) oppose the instant application. (ECF No. 135.) The basis? Incivility. … While, Fitzpatrick and Brown do 1 New York Rules of Professional Conduct (“NYRPC”), Appendix A.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miller v. Terrillion

    391 F. Supp. 3d 217 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 24, 2018

    Brown v. City of Oneonta, New York , 221 F.3d 329 , 337 (2d Cir. 2000), overruled in part on other grounds by Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe , 536 U.S. 273 , 122 S. Ct. 2268 , 153 L. Ed. 2d 309 (2002). … See, e.g., Brown v. City of New York , No. 11-CV-6379 (KBF), 2013 WL 4713561 , at *3 n.1 (S.D.N.Y.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gregor

    872 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 1, 1994

    In enacting HOLA, Congress set out a general framework and left the regulatory details to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (the “Bank Board”). 2 The Supreme Court held that the Bank Board’s authority to regulate federal S … Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp, 331 U.S. 218, 230 , 67 S.Ct. 1146, 1152 , 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947), rev’d on other grounds, Rice v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 331 U.S. 247 , 67 S.Ct. 1160 , 91 L.Ed. 1468 (1947).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • CIT Bank N.A. v. Gordon

    District Court, E.D. New York · May 26, 2020

    Judge Brown recommended granting leave to renew upon the submission of appropriate documentation. Id. at 5. … See Coburn v. P.N. Fin., No. 13-CV-1006 (ADS) (SIL), 2015 WL 520346 at *1 (reviewing R&R without objections for clear error). Accordingly, the Second R&R is adopted in its entirety.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barnes v. The People Of The State Of New York

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 23, 2024

    During the altercation, Brown and a third woman, Monica, had come downstairs. Brown saw Barnes stab Thomas in the neck. Brown grabbed Barnes's arm, pried the knife from his hand, and told him to leave her house. … Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449, 465 (2009) (quoting Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 729 (1991)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Lehman

    533 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 19, 1982

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Subject to narrow due process limitations, the federal government has the right to summarily discharge its employees. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 573 , 92 S.Ct. at 2707 quoting Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 437 , 91 S.Ct. 507, 510 , 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1971).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bellomo v. United Arab Shipping Co.(SAG)

    863 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 21, 1994

    Moreover, Plaintiff testified that when he boarded the ship at approximately 8:10 AM, the deck was covered with freshly fallen snow. (Id. at 31.) … See Ercole v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co. v. United States

    130 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 14, 1955

    On March 21, 1951, pursuant to appropriate action of its Board of Directors, the plaintiff increased the amount of its capital from $3,725,000 to $10,-100,000. … Empire Trust Co. v. Hoey, 2 Cir., 103 F.2d 430 , at page 432.” (Emphasis added.)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Restrepo v. Mechanical Electrical Corp.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 10, 2025

    Co., Ltd. v. … LeBlanc–Sternberg v. Fletcher, 143 F.3d 748, 764 (2d Cir. 1998); see also Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Cargo of Intoxicating Liquor ex British Schooner Patara

    40 F.2d 74 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 11, 1930

    That the commander of the Seneca, after boarding the Patara outside of the territorial waters of the United States, made inquiries of those on board, examined the ship’s papers, and ascertained that the schooner had imported … Company v. Mellon, 262 U. S. 100 , 43 S. Ct. 504 , 67 L. Ed. 894 , 27 A. L. R. 1306; The Sagatind, supra; the Pictonian, supra; United States v. 2,180 Cases of Champagne (C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 710 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Total Aviation Services, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank

    626 F. Supp. 1087 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 22, 1986

    See Fed’l Reserve Board, The Federal Reserve System, Purposes and Functions (1974). … Hanson v. Denckla.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The Southern Cross

    31 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 26, 1940

    The question of governmental exemption from local property taxes has been discussed in numerous cases, an early example of which is King County, Wash. v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 9 Cir., 282 F. 950 . … See, also, Clallam County v. United States, 263-U.S. 341, 44 S.Ct. 121 , 68 L.Ed. 328 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alvarez v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 4, 2023

    BROWN, United States District Judge: In this appeal brought pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405 et seq. … Brown GARY R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trico Products Corp. v. E. A. Laboratories, Inc.

    49 F.2d 404 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 24, 1931

    Brown Saddle Co. v. Troxel (C. C.) 98 F. 620 ; Virtue v. Creamery Package Mfg. Co., 179 F. 115 , 102 C. C. A. 413 . … Langley v. Devlin, 95 Wash. 171 , 163 P. 395 , 4 A. L. R. 32, note, 44, 65; Talbot v. Independent Order of Owls, 220 F. 660 , 136 C. C. A. 268 ; Bentley v. Tibbals, 223 F. 247 , 138 C. C. A. 489 ; Trice v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Darby Drug Co., Inc. v. Zlotnick

    573 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 31, 1983

    Zlotnick is a Florida resident and was Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and a major shareholder of Barth-Spencer until Darby acquired it in June, 1981. … See Heyman v. *664 Ar.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Vlahopoulos v. Roslyn Union Free School District

    District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 2024

    District Board of Education (“BOE”) Policy 5300.30(E)(13) similarly prohibits the use or possession or electronic smoking devices. Id. at ¶25. … Judge Brown heard argument on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and on May 28, 2021 he dismissed all claims against the Januszewski and Pazooki defendants, as well as Defendant Brown. ECF No. 26.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.