Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyed

9,793 results

3.60s

  • Carvant Financial LLC v. Autoguard Advantage Corp.

    958 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 5, 2013

    Oct. 12, 2011); Brown v. St. … In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732 , 739 fn. 7 (Tex.2005); see Local Union No. 38, Sheet Metal Workers’ Int’l Ass’n, 357 F.3d at 268 ; Javitch v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Romain v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2025

    Weiner v. Siemens AG, 87 F.4th 157, 164 (2d Cir. 2023) (quoting United States ex rel. Drake v. Norden Sys., Inc., 375 F.3d 248, 254 (2d Cir. 2004)). … Nodify, Inc. v. Kristan, No. 17-CV-2201, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69070, 2020 WL 13566475, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2020) (quoting Martens v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • PHL Variable Ins. Co. v. Mahler

    321 F. Supp. 3d 392 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 15, 2018

    Any time we see a rec[i]ssion or a cold return of premium, there [is] a [one] hundred percent chargeback ... that's across the board all our products."). 29. … . *401 Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Constr. Corp. , 41 N.Y. 2d 397 , 399, 393 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 361 N.E.2d 999 (1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kimball v. National Bank of North America, N.A.

    468 F. Supp. 1069 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 27, 1979

    Tiffany v. National Bank of Missouri, supra; Brown v. First National City Bank, 503 F.2d 114 (CA2 1974). … See, e. g., Tele-Controls, Inc. v. Ford Industries, Inc., 388 F.2d 48 (CA7 1967); Bache & Co., Inc. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341 (SDNY) aff’d 469 F.2d 696 (CA2 1972); Reines Distributors, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Department of Education

    District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 28, 2023

    Brown sent Ms. … Banister v. Davis, 140 S. Ct. 1698, 1708 (2020); see Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Peoples v. Rosenbaum

    64 F. Supp. 3d 369 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 10, 2014

    Kavanagh, 640 F.2d 450, 450 (2d Cir.1981) (noting prosecutors retain absolute immunity for negotiating a guilty plea); Brown v. City of N.Y., No. 10-CV-5229(ENV)(ALC), 2013 WL 3245214 , at *15, n. 11 (E.D.N.Y. … See Heck v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ryan

    365 F. Supp. 2d 338 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 22, 2005

    Lake v. Binghamton Hous. … Similarly, in Hoeppel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Village Green at Sayville, LLC v. The Town of Islip

    District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 22, 2021

    official capacity as Member of the Planning Board of the Town of Islip, KEVIN BROWN, individually and in his official capacity as … Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Fernandez

    871 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 19, 1994

    The prosecutor then explained that on February 2, 1982, Coast Guard officers boarded a vessel in international waters and immediately detected the odor of marijuana; discovered 30,000 pounds of marijuana on board, some of … See United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re MTC Electronic Technologies Shareholders Litigation

    898 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 7, 1995

    of Directors and the Board’s Audit Committee), and Thomas Lenagh (Member of the Board of Directors since 1992 and a former member of the Audit Committee). … Trades Dep’t v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Bishop v. United States

    173 F. Supp. 273 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 10, 1958

    This suit in Admiralty was instituted by the libelant to recover damages for injuries he received on board the U. S. Naval Ship, General C. C. Ballou, on May 30, 1954. … This liability was extended to an employee of a stevedoring company engaged in the loading of a ship for injuries resulting from defective equipment brought on board by the stevedoring company. Alaska Steamship Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Diners/Fugazy Sales Corp. v. Universal Line S. A.

    302 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 25, 1969

    In Hamburg-American Line v. … In Tiedemann v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Nassau County

    District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 25, 2019

    Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 339 (2d Cir. 2000). … (quoting Brown v. City of N.Y, 95 N.Y.2d 389, 392-93 (2000)); Javed v. Shuang Zhang, 872 F. Supp. 2d 194, 198 (N.D.N.Y. 2012).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Finnigan v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.

    District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 5, 2024

    Brown v. Green 317 Madison, LLC, No. 11-CV-4466, 2014 WL 1237448, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2014) (citing Hensley v. … Brown, 2014 WL 1237448, at *10 (collecting cases) (quoting Bliven v. Hunt, 579 F.3d 204, 213 (2d Cir. 2009)); John v. DeMaio, No. 15-CV- 6094, 2016 WL 7469862, at *8 (E.D.N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lily Produce Inc. v. 5 Borough Market II Corp. and Ashraf A. Sharhan

    District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 30, 2025

    K; Brown Decl. ¶ 13; Mem. L. at 10). … (Brown Decl. ¶¶ 13-14; Ex. F, ECF 12-6.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Watt v. United States

    246 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 6, 1965

    In Feres v. … In Feres v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Kulukundis

    182 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 22, 1959

    There are some exceptions, namely vis major, Crossman v. Burrill, 1900, 179 U.S. 100 , 21 S.Ct. 38 , 45 L.Ed. 106 , and where the delay is the fault of libelant or one for whom he is responsible, United States v. … The general strike exception clause found in paragraph 18 “General Exceptions Clause” is insufficient to stop demurrage (Yone Suzuki & Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cepeda v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    273 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 22, 2003

    Duamutef v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 2008 WL 21087984 , *3 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Barbaro v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22517 , at *2-3 (E.D.Pa.1999); Loaiza v. … Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701 , 121 S.Ct. 2491 , 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). However, because a CPDO does not constitute a release for the purpose of 8 U.S.C. § 1231 , see Bispham v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Millian-Zamora v. Ashcroft

    228 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 23, 2002

    In INS. v. St. … Akhtar v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.

    212 F. 192 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 6, 1914

    Ed. 939 , American Road Machine Co. v. Pennock & Sharp Co., 164 U. S. 26 , 17 Sup. Ct. 1, 41 L. Ed. 337 , and Marchand v. Emken, supra). … Leeds & Catlin v. Victor Talking Machine Co., supra; Hohman Co. v. Tagliabue Co. (C. C.) 175 Fed. 87 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.