Case law

United States v. Quaritius

267 F. 227 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 10, 1920

search, and in a closet opening upon a passageway which connected the saloon with a grocery store or ship chandlery, found a quart bottle containing a colorless liquid, which they assumed to be alcohol, a pint bottle of brown … S. v. Achen, 267 Fed. 595 , Eastern District of New York, decided March 31, 1920. In that case the court cited, among other authorities, U. S. v. Maxwell, Fed. Cas.

Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

195 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 20, 1961

United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior and Gulf Navigation Company, supra; see N. L. R. B. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Rockaway News Supply Co., Inc., 345 U.S. 71, 75 , 73 S.Ct. 519, 522 , 97 L.Ed. 832 . . United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior and Gulf Navigation Company, supra.

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

854 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 3, 1994

Subsequent to the conversion, a Board of Directors (the “Board”) comprised of elected proprietary lessees was established to operate and maintain the Building. PL’s 3(g) Statement ¶ 15; Rothken Affirm. ¶ 6. … Co. v.

Eclipse MacH. Co. v. J. H. Specialty Mfg. Co.

4 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 7, 1933

Brown & Green Ignition Sales Co., Inc., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, decree dated April 2, 1929, the deeree is in the form of a consent decree, but was made after proceedings … Brown & Caine (D. C.) 10 F.(2d) 823 ; Connecticut Telephone & Electric Co. v. Automotive Equipment Co. (D. C.) 14 F.(2d) 957 , affirmed (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 990 .

Vasquez v. Poole

331 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 20, 2004

Kuhlman, 365 F.3d 137, 141 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Brown v. Artuz, 283 F.3d 492, 498 (2d Cir.2002)). … Brown, 243 A.D.2d 749 , 662 N.Y.S.2d 934 ; People v. Boles, 198 A.D.2d 837, 604 N.Y.S.2d 412 ; People v. Coward, 100 A.D.2d 628 , 473 N.Y.S.2d 591 ). People v.

Hazeltine Corp. v. White

2 F. Supp. 94 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 12, 1933

Armstrong et al. v. Langmuir et al. (C. C. A.) 6 F.(2d) 369 . But they have the same rights under section 4915 as has the plaintiff. … Cleveland Trust Co. v. Nelson (D. C.) 51 F.(2d) 276 . Of course, this court should not entertain jurisdiction in the absence of such indispensable parties. Ettenberg v. Blair (D. C.) 36 F.(2d) 989 .

Great Eastern Fuel Co. v. Tanker Hygrade No. 26, Inc.

196 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 27, 1961

Dahl who was mate on board the evening of the occurrence. … See Foltis, Inc. v. City of New York, 287 N.Y. 108, 116 , 38 N.E.2d 455, 460 , 153 A.L.R. 1122 . In Foltis, Inc. v.

Puckett v. City of Glen Cove

631 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 30, 2009

As often stated, federal courts hearing civil rights cases do not sit as zoning boards of appeal over local zoning decisions. Natale, 170 F.3d at 263 , quoting, Village of Belle Terre v. … RRI Realty, 870 F.2d at 915, quoting, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Bryant v. Begin Manage Program

281 F. Supp. 2d 561 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 26, 2003

Bryant also had short, curly blond hair, which was dyed from a natural color of brown to blond. (Id. at 27.) … “An employment discrimination plaintiff faced with a properly supported summary judgment motion ‘must do more than simply show there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts.’ ” Brown v.

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC

293 F.R.D. 138 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 17, 2013

In Mendez v. … Kassim v.

Reyes v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

478 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 18, 1979

An appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was denied on March 20, 1978. … Judge Sofaer, in dicta, stated that: “[T]he Board’s rulings with respect to Law 985 are questionable.

Keyer v. Civil Service Commission of City of New York

397 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 29, 1975

Vega v. Civil Service Commission, City of New York, 385 F.Supp. 1376 (S.D.N.Y.1974). This remedial principle is recognized in other jurisdictions. See Newcomer v. Coleman, 323 F.Supp. 1363 (D.Conn.1970), and Roumani v. … They are of no benefit to Keyer in his employment with the Board of Higher Education.

The Charles Henry

5 F. Cas. 509 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 15, 1865

I content myself with adopting the language of Judge Story in the case of Rowe v. … He boarded the wreck,..and directed the labor of preparing it for a successful voyage to a port of safety.

Hammond v. United States

388 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 31, 1975

Brown v. United States, 353 F.2d 578, 580 (9th Cir. 1965). Therefore, to apply the traditional standard to the present case, plaintiff’s claim would be time-barred. By 1962 Mr. … As stated in Brown v.

Engel v. Tinker National Bank

269 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 25, 1967

Brown Brothers Contractors, Inc. v. Carroll Material Corp. et al., County Court, Suffolk County, Index No. 73833-1961. … Leipert v. R. C. Williams & Co., 161 F.Supp. 355, 359 (S.D.N.Y. 1957). The reasons for the New York rule are set forth in Moyer v. Hinman, quoted above. See also Trustees of Union College v.

Ferrara v. Oakfield Leasing Inc.

904 F. Supp. 2d 249 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 9, 2012

.”); see also Brown v. … .”); Board of Trustees, Nat. Shopmen Pension Fund v.

Dr. Gerald Finkel, as Chairman of the Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry v. Firequench, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 20, 2020

(USA), Inc. v. Alcantara, 183 F.3d 151, 155 (2d Cir. 1999). … See Finkel v. Triple A Grp., Inc., 708 F. Supp. 2d 277, 283 n.5 (E.D.N.Y. 2010); see also Finkel v. Allstate Elec. Corp., No. 09-cv-4071, 2010 WL 5558899, at *5 (E.D.N.Y.

The Navemar

17 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 22, 1936

on board the ship. … Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 , 6 S.Ct. 524 , 29 L.Ed. 746 ; United States v. Jose [C.C.] 63 F. 951 ; State v. Davis, 50 W. Va. 100 , 40 S.E. 331 , 14 Am.Crim.Rep. 282; King v. Ohio & M. R.

Hartley v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.

543 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 16, 1982

However, during the operation, the foreman noticed that a board was loose on one of the fender systems and directed the crew to use the swinging ball on the derrick to knock the board into place. … Pfeiffer Co. v.

In re Chester A. Poling, Inc.

51 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 26, 1943

Brown v. Cranston, 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 631 .