Case law

Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.

229 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 14, 1964

-C.I.O. v. … Y. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co., 298 F.2d 644, 646 (2 Cir. 1962).

Campbell ex rel. J.C. v. MBI Associates, Inc.

98 F. Supp. 3d 568 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2015

Defendant has also submitted two affidavits or affirmations: the Affirmation of Christian Browne, Esq., an attorney who formerly represented MBI in this action (the “Browne Affirmation”), and the Affidavit of Norman Alpren … In Pearce v.

Poppo v. Long Island Rail Road

864 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 3, 1994

Santos v. District Council of New York City, 619 F.2d 963, 968-69 (2d Cir.1980); see also DelCostello v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 , 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983). … This argument flies in the face of Engelhardt v.

King v. Randazzo

234 F. Supp. 388 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 13, 1964

Cf., Wittstein v. American Federation of Musicians, supra. II. … See Calagaz v. Calhoon, 5 Cir.1962, 309 F.2d 248 ; Harvey v. Calhoon, S.D.N.Y. 1963, 224 F.Supp. 800 .

The George & Earl

30 F.2d 441 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 16, 1928

S. v. 63 Kegs (C. C. A.) 27 F.(2d) 741 . … Co. v. Mellon, 262 U. S. 100 , 43 S. Ct. 504 , 67 L. Ed. 894 , 27 A. L. R. 1306; The Pictonian, supra.

Marcoux v. American Airlines, Inc.

645 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 22, 2008

See Cooper v. TWA Airlines, LLC, 2005 WL 3863435 , 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41007 (E.D.N.Y. July 18, 2005); Cooper v. TWA Airlines, Inc., 349 F.Supp.2d 495 (E.D.N.Y.2004); Cooper v. … “The Executive Committee shall act as the agent for and on behalf of the Voting Board of Directors, and shall interpret this Constitution, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.” Art. Ill § (4)(A).

Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.

71 F. Supp. 2d 173 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 20, 1999

Rather than weighing the reasonableness of each individual time entry, the court may exclude excessive and unreasonable hours from a fee request by making an across-the-board reduction in the amount of hours. Kirsch v. … Shapiro v.

Donohoe v. St. Rose of Lima Roman Catholic Church

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 29, 2024

Brown and Judge Joan M. Azrack. On August 10, 2023, Judge Brown issued a decision remanding 42 cases to state court on the grounds that the state court can timely adjudicate the actions. … This Court, too, adopts Judge Brown’s conclusion and finds that it must abstain from the exercise of “related to” jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1334(c)(2).

Brown

District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 17, 2025

P. 56(e)(2); Giannullo v. … Smith & Son v. Taylor, 276 U.S. 179, 182 (1928)); see also Kelly v.

J. Baranello & Sons v. Hausmann Industries, Inc.

571 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 9, 1983

Brown Brothers Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Construction Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 397 , 393 N.Y.S.2d 350 , 361 N.E.2d 999 (1977). … As the New York Court of Appeals held in Kleinschmidt Division of SCM Corp. v.

Citizens Bank v. Decena

562 B.R. 202 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 29, 2016

P. 8013; KLG Gates LLP v. Brown, 506 B.R. 177, 189 (E.D.N.Y. 2014) (Spatt, J.). … New York v. Green, 420 F.3d 99, 104 (2d Cir. 2005).

Mandaglio v. UNITED BROTH. OF CARPENTERS, ETC.

528 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 9, 1981

UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA (GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD), New York City District Council of United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners (Executive Board), Local Union 385 of United Brotherhood of … Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc. v. Birenbaum, 527 F.2d 87, 93-94 (2d Cir. 1975); Socialist Workers Party v. Attorney General, 375 F.Supp. 318, 321-22 (S.D.N.Y. 1974); Lamarr v.

Meling v. St. Francis College

3 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 1998

Id. at 323, 386 N.Y.S.2d 685 , 353 N.E.2d 598 (quoting Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967) (internal quotation marks omitted)). … See, e.g., Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores, 135 F.3d 376, 381 (6th Cir.1998); Talavera v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 129 F.3d 1214, 1220 (11th Cir.1997); Swanks v. Washington Metro.

Marenghi v. Church of Good Shepherd

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 29, 2024

Brown and Judge Joan M. Azrack. On August 10, 2023, Judge Brown issued a decision remanding 42 cases to state court on the grounds that the state court can timely adjudicate the actions. … This Court, too, adopts Judge Brown’s conclusion and finds that it must abstain from the exercise of “related to” jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1334(c)(2).

Doe v. Good Samaritan Hospital

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 29, 2024

Brown and Judge Joan M. Azrack. On August 10, 2023, Judge Brown issued a decision remanding 42 cases to state court on the grounds that the state court can timely adjudicate the actions. … This Court, too, adopts Judge Brown’s conclusion and finds that it must abstain from the exercise of “related to” jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1334(c)(2).

Bullock v. Capitol Airways, Inc.

176 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 9, 1959

In Alaska Air Transport v. … In Pacific Northern Airlines v.

Society for Good Will to Retarded Children, Inc. v. Cuomo

574 F. Supp. 994 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 17, 1983

See Thomas v. Board of Education, 505 F.Supp. 102, 104 (N.D.N.Y.1981); NAACP v. … See Cohen v. West Haven Board of Police Commissioners, 638 F.2d 496, 505 (2d Cir.1980).

United States v. Certain Lands in Borough of Brooklyn

43 F. Supp. 578 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 25, 1942

If the foregoing were the only embodiment of the legislative selection of procedure, it would follow that only the commission form of proceeding has been sanctioned, but the truth is to the contrary: In Cruger v. … Kohl v. United States, 1875, 91 U.S. 367, 376 , 23 L.Ed. 449 , contains some discussion of the nature of a condemnation proceeding and the manner of its exercise pursuant to federal statute.

The Aalesund

1 F. Cas. 1 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 15, 1877

On the other hand, the case of Coughtry v. … See, also, Loop v. Litchfield, 42 N. Y. 351 .

Karlin v. Avis

326 F. Supp. 1325 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 20, 1971

In Pickford v. … Second, it appears obvious that 20-year-old Brown University student, Warren Avis, Jr., is a person of suitable age and discretion within the meaning of the statute. Bradian v. Chavez, N.Y. L.J.