Case law

National Integrated Group Pension Plan v. Dunhill Food Equipment Corp.

938 F. Supp. 2d 361 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 3, 2013

Fund v. … Ltd. v. Donovan, 880 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 22 Misc.3d 1119(A) , 2009 WL 294685 at *5 (2009) (rejecting the defendant's claim that its "informal” board meetings constituted corporate formalities). .

Solinsky v. Arthritis Foundation

635 F. Supp. 620 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 16, 1986

Plaintiff, admittedly, is neither board certified nor board eligible. Hence, his name was dropped from the defendant’s referral list. … See also Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit Corp.

D & H Auto Parts, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.

57 F.R.D. 548 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 5, 1973

The admissibility of computer printouts, even against a stranger, and in a criminal case, was approved in United States v. De Georgia, 420 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1969). … As the court stated in Olympic Insurance *552 Co. v.

Montellier v. United States

202 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 5, 1962

Co. v. … It is by now well settled that merely by boarding the plane commercial airline passengers no longer assent to encountering a known danger either with respect to the plane itself or its operation. Urban v.

M.S. v. New Hyde Park-Garden City Park Union Free School District

District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 28, 2022

. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 5-CV-5579, -- -------------- 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). … See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008).

Giacchetto v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District

293 F.R.D. 112 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 6, 2013

.”); Barrett v. City of New York, 237 F.R.D. 39, 40 (E.D.N.Y.2006) (noting that the information sought “need not be admissible at trial to be discoverable”); Brown v. … In Offenback v. L.M.

Bormann v. Long Island Press Publishing Co., Inc.

379 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 5, 1974

The Board reversed and on April 3, 1972 issued a finding of probable cause. … In Bowe v.

Bower v. Walsh

703 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 31, 2010

M.R. testified that she told the police that the man had brown hair, brown eyes, a “round face,” and a mustache. (Pet. Exh. A, Vol. 10, at 99-101.) … In a police form, D.B. is described as telling the police that the man had a mustache, brown eyes, and medium length brown hair and was white, between 28 to 36 years old, and 5'7" tall. (Pet. Exh. G.)

Rivera v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Company

340 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 12, 1972

Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N.Y. 259, 268 , 115 N.E. 915, 918 (1917); see also Beja v. Jahangiri, 453 F.2d 959, 961 (2 Cir.1972). … And in Blount v. Peerless Chemicals (P.R.)

Price v. City of New York

797 F. Supp. 2d 219 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 22, 2011

Brady v. … Lyons v.

United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co.

131 F. Supp. 717 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 2, 1954

In United States v. … Weicker v. Bromfield, 10 Cir., 34 F.2d 377, 385 . The Court of Claims in Brooklyn & Queens Screen Mfg. Co. v. United States, supra, quoted the follow *729 ing from Pigeon v. United States, 27 Ct.

Citibank, N.A. v. Citytrust

596 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 26, 1984

Suffice it to note that in Sally Gee, Inc. v. … The Federal Reserve Board found no reasonable basis for concluding that there is such similarity between that name and Citytrust as to result in any unfair competition.

White v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.

133 F.R.D. 425 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 1990

Bottaro v. Hatton Assocs., 680 F.2d 895 , 896-97 (2d Cir.1982); Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241, 1246 (2d Cir.1979). … Board of Education v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241 , 1246 (2d Cir.1979).

National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Sanders

271 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jul 12, 1967

’s consent, and required Sanders also forthwith to advise the Board of all property of Kemp’s that he had. … Lee & Co., v. Veatch, 4th Cir. 1962, 301 F.2d 434 , 96 A.L.R.2d 619 ; see further, Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v.

Selzer v. Berkowitz

477 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 3, 1979

In principle, this case is indistinguishable from Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees for the State Colleges of the State of Connecticut, 474 F.2d 485, 490 (2d Cir. 1973). … In Johnson v.

Brochstein v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

266 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 22, 1967

The later New York cases do not suggest any approach to that test, nor any retreat from the principles enunciated in the Court of Appeals cases, and neither Brown v. … Co. v.

The Metropolis

17 F. Cas. 216 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 15, 1877

The provisions were ordered by the steward of the boat, appointed by, and acting under the authority of the railroad company, and were delivered on board of and used by the boat. … authorized to procure supplies for a foreign vessel, orders supplies for the vessel, that are used by the vessel and necessary therefor, the presumption arises that they are furnished upon the credit of the vessel (Insurance Co. v.

Long Island Lighting Co. v. Barbash

625 F. Supp. 221 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 8, 1985

See also Canadian Javelin Ltd. v. … New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 256 , 84 S.Ct. 710, 713 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). The Citizens advertisement is primarily designed “to inform and motivate the public,” Brown v.

In re Henry Klein & Co.

1 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 13, 1932

Also it appears that this creditor is represented by four of five members of the board of directors, and that this result was accomplished according to the provisions of written financing agreements entered into during the … Ogden v. Gilt Edge Consolidated Mines Co. (C. C. A.) 225 F. 723 .

Introna v. Allstate Insurance

890 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 3, 1995

In Introna v. Allstate Ins. … The regulations subject a fee award to an $850 limit. 11 N.Y.C.R.R. § 65.17(b)(6)(v).