Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,793 results
1.36s
Solimino v. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
715 F. Supp. 42 · District Court, E.D. New York · May 31, 1989
Duggan v. Board of Education of East Chicago Heights, 818 F.2d 1291 (7th Cir.1987) (unreviewed agency decision not preclusive); Stillians v. … The date of the board meeting is undisputed. The minutes of the board meeting, dated 2/17/82, are annexed as Exhibit A to Affidavit of Plaintiff Angelo J.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Jul 16, 2021
Brown in Supp. of Plf.’s Opp’n (“Brown Aff.”), Dkt. Entry No. 38 at ¶ 5. The parties have submitted different versions of the CBA for the Court’s review. … The Manual, Exhibit 2 to the Brown Aff., Dkt. Entry No. 38-2 at 15-16.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTwo Hundred & Seventy-Five Tons of Mineral Phosphates
9 F. 209 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 7, 1881
This is an action in rent to enforce a lien, claimed by the libellant upon a quantity of mineral phosphates lately on board the brig Dauntless, for delay in removing the same from the vessel aforesaid. … Sprague v. West, Abbott, Adm. 554.
Cited 3 timesPublished5 F. Cas. 1106 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 15, 1879
it was the duty of those on board the Volante to be watching for the signal. … [Case No. 10,097]; The Charlotte Raab [Id. 2,622]; Whitteredge v. Dill, 23 How. [64 U. S.] 453; The Priscilla, 1 Asp. 469.
Cited 0 timesPublished321 F. Supp. 3d 326 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 19, 2018
See Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. , 814 F.3d 619 , 624 (2d Cir. 2016). … Brown , 814 F.3d at 625 . Thus, if the requirements of CPLR § 302 are satisfied, the Court must address whether the exercise of jurisdiction would comport with the Due Process Clause. See Licci v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedScarfi v. Bright Star Industries, Inc.
779 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 2, 1992
In Smith v. … See also Central Valley Typographical Union, No. 46 v.
Cited 2 timesPublished117 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 4, 1954
The Appeal Board is .not bound by the recommendation bptthe regulations,..provide (32. CFR 1626.-, *486 25(d))'that * * * “it shall give consideration to” it. … S. v. Everngam, supra, and that the order directing him to report for induction was void. See Tung v. U. S., 1 Cir., 142 F.2d 919 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedMassapequa Publishing Co. v. Observer, Inc.
191 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 15, 1961
Harms, Inc. v. Sansom House Enterprises, Inc., D.C., 162 F.Supp. 129 ; Ted Browne Music Co. v. Fowler, 2 Cir., 1923, 290 F. 751, 754 . It is immaterial whether a party is an innocent infringer. … American Visuals Corporation v. Holland, 2 Cir., 261 F.2d 652 ; Kraft v. Cohen, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 821 . In F. W. Woolworth Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished107 F. 526 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jan 19, 1901
Reliance is placed upon the decision of Judge Brown in The Rosa (D. C.) 53 Fed. 182 . … similar to those presented in The Rosa, the views of the court in that case would not be easily disregarded, notwithstanding a contrary holding by the United States circuit court of appeals for the First circuit in Quinlan v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Tru-Seal Aluminum Products Corp.
170 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. New York · Feb 17, 1959
In Pollack v. … Brown, 196 U.S. 502 , 25 S.Ct. 339, 341 , 49 L.Ed. 571 , the Court wrote: “It follows that as to such deductions the tie company stood towards Harrison in the relation of a trustee; and, therefore, the case was not one of
Cited 3 timesPublished8 F. Cas. 592 · District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 15, 1870
It •should be used as one of safety, rather than •discipline, and never applied as punishment for past misconduct” Wilson v. The Mary [Case No. 17,823], In Jordan v. … If it be true, that a master is not responsible for an imprisonment inflicted by competent authorities, under the order of a consul (Johnson v. The Coriolanus [Case No. 7,380]; Wilson v. The Mary [Id. 17,823]; Jordan v.
Cited 4 timesPublished342 F. Supp. 3d 275 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 24, 2018
Bd. of Comm'rs of Bryan City v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 410, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … ."); Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJaramillo v. Latino Regal Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York · Dec 21, 2023
Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir. 2011). … Tecocoatzi-Ortiz, 2019 WL 1585163, at *4.; see also Brown v. Daikin Am. Inc., 756 F.3d 219, 226 (2d Cir. 2014) (articulating the same test for determining whether a single integrated enterprise exists).
Cited 0 timesUnknownKrantz Mfg. Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.
282 F. 288 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 21, 1922
Krantz himself, in an earlier patent (No. 705,850, of July 29, 1902), brought the two connections upon the same side of the panel board, by carrying one of his connecting bars across the panel board from one member of the … Hendy v. Miners’ Iron Works, 127 U. S. 370 , 8 Sup. Ct. 1275, 32 L. Ed. 207 ; Thompson v. Boisselier, 114 U. S. 1 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1042, 29 L. Ed. 76 ; Stephenson v. Brooklyn Cross-Town Rd. Co., 114 U. S. 149 , 5 Sup.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAMR Services Corp. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
658 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, E.D. New York · Apr 22, 1987
More on point is Federal Express Corp. v. … See, e.g., Dawidoff v. Over-the Road, etc., Local Union No. 544, 736 F.2d 465 (8th Cir.1984); San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 794 , 799-800 & n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1974).
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcCullough v. Wyandanch Union Free School District
132 F. Supp. 2d 87 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 2, 2001
Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, Will County, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Lewis v. Cowen, 165 F.3d 154, 162 (2d Cir.1999).
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · Mar 30, 2021
recommendations to which objection[s] [are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. … Siegel v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 13-CV-1351, 2016 WL 1211849, at *13 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 22, 2016); see also Dominguez v. 322 Rest. Corp., 14-CV-3643, 2019 WL 2053995, at *4 (S.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDal International Trading Co. v. The SS Milton J. Foreman
171 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, E.D. New York · Mar 13, 1959
Pettinos, Inc. v. … John & Company v.
Cited 6 timesPublished293 F. Supp. 1016 · District Court, E.D. New York · Nov 25, 1968
Salzhandler v. Caputo, 316 F.2d 445, 451 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 946 , 84 S.Ct. 344 , 11 L.Ed.2d 275 accord, Cornelio v. … Foy v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co., 377 F.2d 243 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 848 , 88 S.Ct. 74 , 19 L.Ed.2d 117 ; Gainey v.
Cited 3 timesPublished492 F. Supp. 398 · District Court, E.D. New York · Jun 27, 1980
By special use permit dated November 21, 1975, the National Park Service entered into an arrangement with the New York City Board of Education which permitted the Board to operate an environmental education center in certain … See United States v. Becker, 378 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1967); Bruckner v. United States, 338 F.2d 427 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 937 , 85 S.Ct. 1769 , 14 L.Ed.2d 701 (1965). See also Slagle v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna