Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.48s

  • Town of Huntington v. Public Employment Relations Board

    67 A.D.2d 981 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 20, 1979

    — Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent the Public Employment Relations Board dated March 29, 1978, which, inter alia, certified respondent Local 342, Long Island Public Service … The determination of the board reflects careful consideration of the appropriate factors. There is a rational basis for its determination. Mollen, P. J., Suozzi, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dewitt v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

    90 A.D.3d 1457 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2011

    Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179 [1978]; Matter of Goldsmith v DeBuono, 245 AD2d 627, 628 [1997]). … School Dist., 17 AD3d 823, 824 [2005]; Matter of Mirrer v Hevesi, 4 AD3d 722, 723-724 [2004]; Doolittle v McMahon, 245 AD2d 736, 738 [1997]).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Quaglia v. Lefever

    143 A.D.2d 238 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 24, 1988

    However, relying upon Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections ( 48 NY2d 614 ), the court granted the alternative relief requested by Quaglia by directing the Board "to prepare a ballot so that registered Republicans … party without a designated candidate for that office (see, Matter of Brown v Ulster County Bd. of Elections, supra).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tinajero v. Board of Education

    294 A.D.2d 564 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 2002

    exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for leave to amend the complaint to add a cause of action to recover damages for medical malpractice (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Huntington v … or surprise since the medical malpractice cause of action arises from the same facts as those underlying the general negligence cause of action asserted in the original complaint and third-party complaint (see Huntington v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Albany v. Public Employment Relations Board

    51 A.D.2d 386 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 1976

    Permanent Professional Firefighters Association (APPFA) pursuant to CPLR article 75 or, alternatively, CPLR article 78 against the respondent City of Albany, its Mayor and Comptroller and the Public Employment Relations Board … of Buffalo Police Benevolent Assn, v City of Buffalo, 81 Misc 2d 172 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Board of Sup'rs

    78 N.Y.S. 1081 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1902

    Ziegler v. Chapin, 126 N. Y. 342, 347 , 27 N. E. 471 ; Warrin v. Baldwin, 105 N. Y. 534, 537 , 12 N. E. 49 ; Armstrong v. Grant, 56 Hun, 226, 228, 229 , 9 N. Y. Supp. 388 . See, also, Peck v. Belknap, 130 N. … Gerlach v. Brandreth, 34 App. Div. 197, 199 , 54 N. Y. Supp. 479 ; Bush v. O’Brien, 164 N. Y. 205, 215 , 58 N. E. 106 ; *1083 Ayers v. Lawrence, 59 N. Y. 192 ; Gorden v. Strong, 158 N. Y. 407, 408 , 53 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Drimmer v. Board of Trustees of State University

    98 A.D.2d 132 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 1983

    In implementing subdivision 1 of section 6304 of the Education Law, respondent Board of Trustees of the State University of New York (trustees) and respondent State Budget Director adopted 8 NYCRR 602.8, which, inter alia … inartfully drawn, we agree with Special Term that the regulation in question does not conflict with said section but merely fills in the interstices as delineated by the Legislature (see State Div. of Human Rights [Valdemarsen] v

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dinerman v. Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services, Inc.

    55 A.D.3d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 7, 2008

    factual claims flatly contradicted by documentary evidence are not entitled to any such consideration” (Garber v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y., 38 AD3d 833, 834 [2007], quoting Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87 … Garber v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of N.Y., 38 AD3d at 834 ; Gertler v Goodgold, 107 AD2d 481, 485 [1985], affd 66 NY2d 946 [1985]).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kindman v. Community School Board No. 19, Kings

    48 A.D.2d 834 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 2, 1975

    (see Matter of Ambrose v Community School Board No. 30, 48 AD2d 654 ). … (See my dissenting memoranda in Matter of Parris v Board of Educ. of the City of N. Y., 48 AD2d 835 , and Matter of Beneveniste v Board of Educ. of the City of N. Y., 48 AD2d 833 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zapata v. New York City Board of Education

    40 A.D.3d 1083 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ullman Estates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    97 A.D.2d 296 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1983

    Corp. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., supra; Matter of Axelrod Mgt. Co. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., supra; Matter of Century Operating Corp. v Prince, supra). … Corp. v Prince, supra).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of Investments

    21 A.D.3d 90 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 2005

    Defendant Montana Board of Investments is a governmental *92 agency organized under the laws of the State of Montana, for the purpose of investing public funds, with its principal place of business in Helena. … Network v Focus Media, Inc., 264 AD2d 351 [1999]).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Vasquez v. New York State Board of Parole

    89 A.D.2d 734 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 22, 1982

    is not subject to the convenience and practical control of the board. … Mantón v Von Holden, 86 AD2d 967 ; People ex rel. Delrow v New York State Div. of Parole, 81 AD2d 391 , mot for lv to app dsmd 54 NY2d 784 ; contra People ex rel. Brown v Walters, 84 AD2d 852 [2d Dept]).

    Reversed by Vasquez v. New York State Board of Parole, 58 N.Y.2d 981 (1983)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Suib v. New York City Board of Education

    309 A.D.2d 920 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 2003

    Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744 [1995]; Asaro v Micali, 292 AD2d 552 [2002]). … Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on damages should have been granted (see Farrukh v Board of Educ., 227 AD2d 440 [1996]; see also Bobek v Crystal,

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Edbauer v. Board of Education

    286 A.D.2d 1002 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 28, 2001

    —Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs (see, Karagiannis v New York State Thruway Auth., 209 AD2d 995 ; see also, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Damages.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benedict v. Board of Education

    286 A.D.2d 971 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 28, 2001

    II, 275 AD2d 389, 390 , lv denied 95 NY2d 769 ; Pitkewicz v Boy Scouts, 231 AD2d 561, 561-562 ; Pitkewicz v Kane, 227 AD2d 113, 114 ), and defendant-third-party plaintiff failed to raise a triable question of fact on that … issue (see, Hanley v East Moriches Union Free School Dist.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • New York Citizens Utility Board, Inc. v. Pataki

    231 A.D.2d 185 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 10, 1997

    of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8, 29 [Breitel, Ch. … Cuomo, supra, at 785; Clark v Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 189 ; Matter of Broidrick v Lindsay, 39 NY2d 641, 646 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Samek v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Ballston

    162 A.D.2d 926 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1990

    Props. v Town of Guilderland Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 109 AD2d 164, 166 , affd 66 NY2d 893 ). … Instead, he relied upon the concept approval of his project by the Saratoga County Planning Board and upon his own conclusion that the proposed use would have a minimal impact on traffic.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McGrath v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

    88 A.D.2d 906 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1982

    tecum to come forward with a factual basis which establishes the relevancy of the items sought to the subject matter of the investigation before an individual will be compelled to comply with the subpoena’s mandate (Virag v … P., O’Connor, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities

    139 A.D.3d 1290 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 2016

    SALAMANCA BOARD OF PUBLIC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UTILITIES et al., Appellants. … Leff of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent. __________ Mulvey, J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.