Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.68s
24 A.D.2d 1035 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1965
Proceeding remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination (Matter of Haynal v. Board of Regents, 19 A D 2d 204), and interim stay granted October 9, 1965, vacated, without costs. Gibson, P.
Cited 0 timesPublished23 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1965
Such a statement does not satisfy the requirement for the making of a proper record evidencing new or additional facts as the b'asis for the revocation; we cannot review the Justice’s personal visual observations (Lee v. … Lehrer, 3 A D 2d 702; see Blaney v. Sorensen, 8 A D 2d 938). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Babin, J'J., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished24 A.D.2d 910 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1965
We see no reason to disturb the determination of the Board of Regents. Petitioner’s acts in prescribing narcotics as disclosed by the record are most culpable. … We cannot say, on the record before us, that in denying the rehearing the Board of Regents abused its discretion. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 A.D.2d 892 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1956
Cited 0 timesPublished10 A.D.2d 608 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedNovinson v. Board of Education
14 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublished6 A.D.2d 836 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 30, 1958
I do not believe that it was the legislative intent to restrict the power of the board of water commissioners to assess for benefit by limiting such power to eases in which water mains are extended in public streets (see
Cited 0 timesPublished11 A.D.2d 565 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1960
the clerk, and giving it the most favorable interpretation and inferences to be drawn therefrom, it was sufficient to make out a prima facie ease of negligence against the board. … (Cook v. Burmaster, 9 A D 2d 841; Germond v. Board of Edue., 10 A D 2d 139; lio'binson v. Avella, 10 A D 2d 130.)
Cited 0 timesPublished10 A.D.2d 837 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublished10 A.D.2d 559 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrockway v. Board of Supervisors
17 A.D.2d 828 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 1962
In a proceeding by the Commissioner of Jurors of Dutchess County, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to direct respondent, the Board of Supervisors of such county, to appropriate money for the salary of a Deputy … In our opinion, it was within the board’s power to determine the amount of salary, if any, of the deputy (Judiciary Law, § 654). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 A.D.2d 795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublished16 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 1962
sustained by plaintiff when she was struck in the eye by a plastic golf ball propelled by the defendant Katz while plaintiff and he were fellow students in a course of instruction in the game of golf given by the defendant Board … Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Board of Education, and without costs to defendants Katz and Gottmann. No opinion. Beldock, P.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublished16 A.D.2d 924 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublishedSchechter v. Board of Education
285 A.D. 811 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublishedFenamore v. Board of Education
285 A.D. 905 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 28, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublished286 A.D. 832 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublished13 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 1961
Petitioner further claims that his dismissal by the board was unreasonable and an abuse of discretion. … The board after apparently giving the matter considerable thought and deliberation unanimously recommended that the petitioner be dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCemetery Board v. Evergreens Cemetery
15 A.D.2d 747 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna