Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.68s

  • Kisfaludy v. Board of Regents

    24 A.D.2d 1035 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1965

    Proceeding remitted to Special Term for hearing and determination (Matter of Haynal v. Board of Regents, 19 A D 2d 204), and interim stay granted October 9, 1965, vacated, without costs. Gibson, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lash v. Board of Education

    23 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1965

    Such a statement does not satisfy the requirement for the making of a proper record evidencing new or additional facts as the b'asis for the revocation; we cannot review the Justice’s personal visual observations (Lee v. … Lehrer, 3 A D 2d 702; see Blaney v. Sorensen, 8 A D 2d 938). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Babin, J'J., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bernanke v. Board of Regents

    24 A.D.2d 910 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 18, 1965

    We see no reason to disturb the determination of the Board of Regents. Petitioner’s acts in prescribing narcotics as disclosed by the record are most culpable. … We cannot say, on the record before us, that in denying the rehearing the Board of Regents abused its discretion. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Gibson, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fuchs v. Board of Education

    1 A.D.2d 892 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1956

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Antell v. Board of Education

    10 A.D.2d 608 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Novinson v. Board of Education

    14 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 15, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Buff v. Board of Trustees

    6 A.D.2d 836 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 30, 1958

    I do not believe that it was the legislative intent to restrict the power of the board of water commissioners to assess for benefit by limiting such power to eases in which water mains are extended in public streets (see

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawless v. Board of Education

    11 A.D.2d 565 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1960

    the clerk, and giving it the most favorable interpretation and inferences to be drawn therefrom, it was sufficient to make out a prima facie ease of negligence against the board. … (Cook v. Burmaster, 9 A D 2d 841; Germond v. Board of Edue., 10 A D 2d 139; lio'binson v. Avella, 10 A D 2d 130.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Warner v. Board of Education

    10 A.D.2d 837 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rivera v. Board of Education

    10 A.D.2d 559 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1960

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brockway v. Board of Supervisors

    17 A.D.2d 828 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 1962

    In a proceeding by the Commissioner of Jurors of Dutchess County, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to direct respondent, the Board of Supervisors of such county, to appropriate money for the salary of a Deputy … In our opinion, it was within the board’s power to determine the amount of salary, if any, of the deputy (Judiciary Law, § 654). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Minot v. Board of Education

    16 A.D.2d 795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Francis v. Board of Education

    16 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 1962

    sustained by plaintiff when she was struck in the eye by a plastic golf ball propelled by the defendant Katz while plaintiff and he were fellow students in a course of instruction in the game of golf given by the defendant Board … Judgment, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Board of Education, and without costs to defendants Katz and Gottmann. No opinion. Beldock, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Riley v. Board of Education

    16 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martucci v. Board of Trustees

    16 A.D.2d 924 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schechter v. Board of Education

    285 A.D. 811 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 1955

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fenamore v. Board of Education

    285 A.D. 905 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 28, 1955

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bacon v. Board of Education

    286 A.D. 832 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 1955

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Board of Trustees

    13 A.D.2d 592 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 1961

    Petitioner further claims that his dismissal by the board was unreasonable and an abuse of discretion. … The board after apparently giving the matter considerable thought and deliberation unanimously recommended that the petitioner be dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cemetery Board v. Evergreens Cemetery

    15 A.D.2d 747 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 1962

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.