Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.12s

  • Ruggiano v. Board of Education

    42 A.D.2d 911 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 24, 1973

    Stoddard v. City of New Tork, 12 N Y 2d 792; Chemical Bank v. Padilla, 41 A D 2d 814). Munder, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Turrin v. Board of Education

    40 A.D.2d 878 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 27, 1972

    In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, defendant Board of Education of the City of New York appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November … Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted as between the infant plaintiff and defendant Board of Education solely on the issue of damages, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Board of Education

    40 A.D.2d 698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 16, 1972

    In our opinion, the circumstances presented herein warrant the granting of plaintiffs’ motion and the denial of defendant’s cross motion upon the conditions set forth above *699 (Murray v. … City of New York, 40 A D 2d 539; see, also, Moran, v. Rynar, 39 A D 2d 718). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pollick v. Board of Education

    38 A.D.2d 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kostyrka v. Board of Elections

    37 A.D.2d 774 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 2, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Natale v. Board of Education

    36 A.D.2d 845 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Remsen v. Board of Assessors

    33 A.D.2d 942 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 7, 1970

    Appeal by the Board of Assessors of the Town of Queensbury from a judgment of the Supreme *943 Court, entered December 10, 1968 in Washington County, upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, without a jury. … Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the second decretal paragraph, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the respondent Board of Assessors of the Town of Fort Ann. Herlihy, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chuff v. Board of Education

    30 A.D.2d 590 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 20, 1968

    The petitioner was removed from his position as a school teacher in the respondent Board of Education’s school system in 1957 pursuant to section 3012 of the Education Law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duell v. Board of Education

    30 A.D.2d 600 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 1968

    (Senrow Concessions v. Shelton Props., 10 N Y 2d 320, 326.) … And this is so even in negligence actions (see Donlon v. Pugliese, 27 A D 2d 786).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kaye v. Board of Education

    29 A.D.2d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1968

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sporn v. Board of Trustees

    28 A.D.2d 805 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1967

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dunne v. Board of Education

    28 A.D.2d 549 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1967

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. State

    24 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 13, 1965

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rear v. Board of Regents

    24 A.D.2d 1054 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1965

    This article 78 proceeding seeks a review of the determination of the Board of Regents suspending for a two-month period the petitioner’s right to practice medicine. … The action by the Board of Regents was justified. The discipline imposed was not disproportionate to the offense for which lie was found guilty. (Sec Matter of Palermo v. Board of Regents, 14 A D 2d 953.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lawes v. Board of Education

    23 A.D.2d 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1965

    A question of importance, so it seems to me, is whether the board bad notice of any prior injury as the result of the students’ snowballing activity. … issue of liability is a close one and there is other error with respect to the exclusion of the documentary evidence of the injury to the other child, a new trial should be granted in the interests of justice (Martinez v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Common Council v. Town Board

    23 A.D.2d 514 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 7, 1965

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. Board of Education

    181 A.D. 477 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 1918

    The board of education in fixing salaries must consider “ merit, grade of class taught, length of service, experience in teaching,” and by such things, “or by such a combination of these considerations as said board may deem … Hence, I think that the statute did not constrain the board to group all regular teachers under one head with one uniform salary and increases. But the minimum must always be observed, and there the board failed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aronson v. Board of Elections

    215 A.D. 709 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1925

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Craig

    196 A.D. 892 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1921

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bush v. Board of Supervisors

    42 N.Y.S. 417 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1896

    Justice BROWN to deny that the state may manifest its gratitude for actual military or other public service by the imposition of taxes for the benefit of those who have rendered such service, or of persons dependent upon

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.